killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Nov 7, 2010 9:43am
Well, had there be enough.....he almost certainly would have been charged and tried.
R
rock_knutne
Nov 7, 2010 9:45am
You're waisting your time with those two fools. They don't know the time of day let alone how the juducial system works.killer_ewok;548337 wrote:Well, had there be enough.....he almost certainly would have been charged and tried.
D
dat dude
Posts: 1,564
Nov 7, 2010 9:57am
Didn't the accuser refuse to testify/cooperate in the case? Makes it much more difficult to go forward if the victim does not cooperate.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Nov 7, 2010 10:10am
dat dude;548359 wrote:Didn't the accuser refuse to testify/cooperate in the case? Makes it much more difficult to go forward if the victim does not cooperate.
Makes it a little tougher to believe the accusation too....
People sue McDonald's for their coffee being too hot nowadays. Who the fuck is going to let RAPE go???
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Nov 7, 2010 10:16am
rock_knutne;548340 wrote:You're waisting your time with those two fools. They don't know the time of day let alone how the juducial system works.
LOL you do realize ewok just made it vividly clear that you do not represent the entire ND fanbase? AKA, this guy is a dumbass, we dont want him representing us.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Nov 7, 2010 10:17am
killer_ewok;548373 wrote:Who the fuck is going to let RAPE go???
Hmmm...settle under the table for MILLIONS, or go through a VERY long process against some of the best lawyers in the world? Hmm....
D
dat dude
Posts: 1,564
Nov 7, 2010 10:19am
killer_ewok;548373 wrote:Makes it a little tougher to believe the accusation too....
People sue McDonald's for their coffee being too hot nowadays. Who the fuck is going to let RAPE go???
Don't be so naive. I assume you also supported Michael Jackson back in '93 when he settled with his accuser in his child molestation case for $20 million. Soon after, the accuser and his family refused to cooperate.
But, who the fuck is going to let CHILD MOLESTATION go???
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Nov 7, 2010 10:29am
dat dude;548388 wrote:Don't be so naive. I assume you also supported Michael Jackson back in '93 when he settled with his accuser in his child molestation case for $20 million. Soon after, the accuser and his family refused to cooperate.
But, who the fuck is going to let CHILD MOLESTATION go???
Ding ding ding! we have a winner!
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Nov 7, 2010 10:29am
SportsAndLady;548384 wrote:Hmmm...settle under the table for MILLIONS, or go through a VERY long process against some of the best lawyers in the world? Hmm....
And had she won she would've made millions too, correct? AND had someone who allegedly RAPED her thrown in fucking prison. If that happened to me...I'd want the motherfucker to get what he deserved rather than just cashing in and watching him lie and walk around like he's innocent.
That's called having your cake and eating it too.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Nov 7, 2010 10:31am
dat dude;548388 wrote:Don't be so naive. I assume you also supported Michael Jackson back in '93 when he settled with his accuser in his child molestation case for $20 million. Soon after, the accuser and his family refused to cooperate.
But, who the fuck is going to let CHILD MOLESTATION go???
Fucked up parents who let their kids stay overnight at a grown man's house. A grown man with chimps as pets. That's who.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Nov 7, 2010 10:35am
killer_ewok;548401 wrote:And had she won she would've made millions too, correct?
Right, she would have made millions either way, so why not take the guaranteed millions right away?
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Nov 7, 2010 10:38am
SportsAndLady;548408 wrote:Right, she would have made millions either way, so why not take the guaranteed millions right away?
Because then somehow who violated you in an awful way gets to walk around free without receiving the punishment they should have. And he gets to go back to making millions so big deal to him, right?
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 7, 2010 5:22pm
Steelers should try and get Larry Fitzgerald.
He's projected to be a free agent after next year, 2011.
Arizona isn't a great situation now that Warner is gone. Hines will be retired by then.
Steelers don't usually spend a lot but I think that would be a guy that would be a great fit in the second half of his career, playing alongside Roethlisberger.
He's projected to be a free agent after next year, 2011.
Arizona isn't a great situation now that Warner is gone. Hines will be retired by then.
Steelers don't usually spend a lot but I think that would be a guy that would be a great fit in the second half of his career, playing alongside Roethlisberger.
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Nov 7, 2010 5:27pm
Non;549114 wrote:Steelers should try and get Larry Fitzgerald.
He's projected to be a free agent after next year, 2011.
Arizona isn't a great situation now that Warner is gone. Hines will be retired by then.
Steelers don't usually spend a lot but I think that would be a guy that would be a great fit in the second half of his career, playing alongside Roethlisberger.
I can't picture the Steelers doing something like that...doesn't fit their trend. But it has to be tough on Fitz to be playing on a loser after getting a taste of the super bowl.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 7, 2010 5:34pm
It would be uncharacteristic of them doing something like that, signing a big name free agent but I think Fitzgerald would be worth the price. Good character. Winner. You know with Roethlisberger they would be great for a few years.
Not sure if a trade would be a possibility. I think Fitzgerald has some clauses, but I'd give up a lot of picks. He'll be a difference maker.
Not sure if a trade would be a possibility. I think Fitzgerald has some clauses, but I'd give up a lot of picks. He'll be a difference maker.
R
rock_knutne
Nov 7, 2010 6:40pm
SportsAndLady;548383 wrote:LOL you do realize ewok just made it vividly clear that you do not represent the entire ND fanbase? AKA, this guy is a dumbass, we dont want him representing us.
Once again, you should keep your mouth shut when you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. ewok is a personal friend of mine, I doubt he would say such things about me......but you on the other hand?
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Nov 7, 2010 7:09pm
rock_knutne;549278 wrote:Once again, you should keep your mouth shut when you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. ewok is a personal friend of mine, I doubt he would say such things about me......but you on the other hand?
He said it, sooooo
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Nov 7, 2010 7:14pm
Non;549114 wrote:Steelers should try and get Larry Fitzgerald.
He's projected to be a free agent after next year, 2011.
Arizona isn't a great situation now that Warner is gone. Hines will be retired by then.
Steelers don't usually spend a lot but I think that would be a guy that would be a great fit in the second half of his career, playing alongside Roethlisberger.
I would jump for joy if that happend. Fitz is one of my favorite players in the game. I'd love to see him in the black n' gold.
Art Modell
Posts: 2,338
Nov 7, 2010 8:28pm
Non;549114 wrote:Steelers should try and get Larry Fitzgerald.
He's projected to be a free agent after next year, 2011.
Arizona isn't a great situation now that Warner is gone. Hines will be retired by then.
Steelers don't usually spend a lot but I think that would be a guy that would be a great fit in the second half of his career, playing alongside Roethlisberger.
There has been talk about this on the talk shows. Fitz is unhappy in Arizona due to the qb situation plus he is familiar with Pittsburgh. I would not rule it out.
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Nov 8, 2010 10:06am
Fitzgerald would be a great fit in Pittsburgh. I'd hate to see that happen, though.
And how about we keep this thread on topic? Quit bitching back and forth with each other like little children. Jesus, you're grown men (and women).
And how about we keep this thread on topic? Quit bitching back and forth with each other like little children. Jesus, you're grown men (and women).
bigdaddy2003
Posts: 7,384
Nov 8, 2010 10:22am
It's hard for me to say who will win this game. I'd usually say Pittsburgh but for some reason I think Cincy is going to pull it out. I say Bengals by 3.
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Nov 8, 2010 12:35pm
It's really a must-win for Pittsburgh. Here's to hoping that the 3-4 Palmer passes per game that SHOULD HAVE been picked off actually are intercepted by the Steelers. I'm saying Steelers win 27-13.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 8, 2010 2:11pm
It's a must win. Not in terms of overall record but because the Steelers need to win all of their remaining division games in case there is a tiebreaker with Baltimore.
A lot is on the Steelers offense to be more focused on their assignments and execute better. That unit has to start coming together and being more efficient tonight.
Bengals will get up for this game so it's up to the Steelers to come in well prepared and focused.
A lot is on the Steelers offense to be more focused on their assignments and execute better. That unit has to start coming together and being more efficient tonight.
Bengals will get up for this game so it's up to the Steelers to come in well prepared and focused.
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Nov 8, 2010 2:27pm
The play calling needs to stop being so damned predictable for the Steelers. If I can tell what the play will be before it happens then professional players and coaches sure as hell can too.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 8, 2010 2:33pm
The big stat is third down conversions.
The Steelers are 29th in the NFL.
That will solve a lot if they can convert third downs and keep the offense on the field. Then they'll run more plays and get in a groove.
The Steelers are 29th in the NFL.
That will solve a lot if they can convert third downs and keep the offense on the field. Then they'll run more plays and get in a groove.