Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 8, 2010 9:47pm
As far as holding, that happens 50 times a game on the edge rushers.
Sometimes it's holding and sometimes it isn't.
The NFL officials do not have a clear grasp on that type of play.
Sometimes it's holding and sometimes it isn't.
The NFL officials do not have a clear grasp on that type of play.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 8, 2010 9:48pm
that was a catch
and then fumble out of bounds
and then fumble out of bounds
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 8, 2010 9:49pm
no way
about three steps
catch
about three steps
catch
THE4RINGZ
Posts: 16,816
Nov 8, 2010 9:49pm
Catch
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Nov 8, 2010 9:49pm
Non;550874 wrote:that was a catch
and then fumble out of bounds
Yep.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Nov 8, 2010 9:49pm
3 steps, it was a catch
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 8, 2010 9:50pm
they'll call it a catch and then call some bogus holding on the Steelers first play to even it up
THE4RINGZ
Posts: 16,816
Nov 8, 2010 9:50pm
LOLNon;550884 wrote:they'll call it a catch and then call some bogus holding on the Steelers first play to even it up
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 8, 2010 9:51pm
still, hang onto the ball Wallace and Ward
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Nov 8, 2010 9:51pm
Why would you challenge that. I hate dumb coaches.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Nov 8, 2010 9:51pm
Dislodged. Love it.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 8, 2010 9:52pm
well, false start but it was legit
damn it
damn it
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 8, 2010 9:53pm
I think we have to pass, can't run it in from the 15 in goal to go
Spaeth might be a good call, he's shown some good hands lately
Spaeth might be a good call, he's shown some good hands lately
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Nov 8, 2010 9:56pm
Hines!
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 8, 2010 9:56pm
touchdown Ward
wow tight throw
wow tight throw
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 8, 2010 9:57pm
that's a pass right there
third and goal from beyond the 10 to get it in and not have to kick a field goal
third and goal from beyond the 10 to get it in and not have to kick a field goal
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Nov 8, 2010 9:57pm
yeah definitely was not in
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Nov 8, 2010 9:57pm
Case in point why you dont waste a challenge. Ward was down before he was in the endzone.
stroups
Posts: 3,223
Nov 8, 2010 9:57pm
I don't want to be a negative nacy but it looked like his knee touched before the ball crossed the goal line
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 8, 2010 9:58pm
wow definitely down
surprised they didn't challenge
surprised they didn't challenge
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 8, 2010 9:59pm
let em right back in it with a kick return
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Nov 8, 2010 10:00pm
Non;550916 wrote:wow definitely down
surprised they didn't challenge
They cant risk that second challenge in the first half, when Big Ben likely scores on a sneak.
BUT, its also why you dont use challenges on hopes and dreams (and hope that a technicality in a rule saves you). You save those challenges for times like that, etc.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Nov 8, 2010 10:00pm
Oh well, they should've challenged it then. Similar to the non-challenge by the Steelers after it appeared Mendenhall scored on the 2nd down & goal to go against the Saints last week. Tomlin challenged a fumble that had no chance to get overturned early in the game and I think they didn't wanna be out of challenge's in the 1st half so they didn't throw the red flag on the Mendenhall play.
Coaches/guys in the booth need to be a little smarter with their challenges.
Coaches/guys in the booth need to be a little smarter with their challenges.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 8, 2010 10:00pm
should've not challenged the other play and challenged that one
but I think they should do away with that
just review everything close rather than just give the coaches two challenges
but I think they should do away with that
just review everything close rather than just give the coaches two challenges
stroups
Posts: 3,223
Nov 8, 2010 10:02pm
Leanord missed that block