Archive Week 6: Cleveland Browns (1-4) at Pittsburgh Steelers (3-1)

O

outdoorsman

Posts: 417

Oct 17, 2010 5:22pm

Art Modell;523228 wrote:I wonder if Cribbs and Massaquio are playing Go Fish on the bus ride home. hahahaaaaa

I heard they were going to play HOT HANDS. With double vision, that would fun to watch.

I

I drain 3's

Posts: 574

Oct 17, 2010 5:23pm

Art Modell;523228 wrote:I wonder if Cribbs and Massaquio are playing Go Fish on the bus ride home. hahahaaaaa

I wonder if you will ever, ever come up with anything funny?

I'm going to guess no.

wes_mantooth

Posts: 17,977

Oct 17, 2010 5:33pm

Art Modell;523228 wrote:I wonder if Cribbs and Massaquio are playing Go Fish on the bus ride home. hahahaaaaa

stay classy

wes_mantooth

Posts: 17,977

Oct 17, 2010 5:38pm

se-alum;523224 wrote:I know Wright hasn't looked good, but I put much of that on the inability for us to get pressure when we're blitzing every play. If the blitz doesn't get there, it's nearly impossible to cover receivers one on one for that amount of time. I've never seen a team blitz so much, and be so bad at it.

My problem is that he looks to be out of position most of the time....it is like his head isn't in the game.

I

I Wear Pants

Posts: 16,223

Oct 17, 2010 5:39pm

Both punters were excellent today. Cleveland's may have saved them even more points by putting Pittsburgh in tough field position several times.

J

jmog

Posts: 6,567

Oct 17, 2010 6:16pm

Art Modell;523228 wrote:I wonder if Cribbs and Massaquio are playing Go Fish on the bus ride home. hahahaaaaa

Typical classless post from AM.

Come on, one was a good tackle, the other was a cheap shot that should have been a penalty (with the new defenseless WR rules) and probably will still be a fine.

Art Modell

Posts: 2,338

Oct 17, 2010 6:22pm

jmog;523267 wrote:Typical classless post from AM.

Come on, one was a good tackle, the other was a cheap shot that should have been a penalty (with the new defenseless WR rules) and probably will still be a fine.

Cheapshot my ass. It's football not soccer.

killer_ewok

Posts: 11,379

Oct 17, 2010 6:24pm

The first one may have been cheap. Hell, I think TJ Ward's hit on Shipley last week was cheap. It happens.

Laley23

Posts: 29,506

Oct 17, 2010 6:34pm

killer_ewok;523275 wrote:The first one may have been cheap. Hell, I think TJ Ward's hit on Shipley last week was cheap. It happens.

see I dont think it was cheap. I just think it shouldve been flagged. The inconsistency on that shit is maddening.

Non

Posts: 9,517

Oct 17, 2010 6:40pm

Nice win.

I didn't think the Steelers were in much trouble even at 7-3 but the bad field position kept the game close for awhile.

justincredible

Posts: 32,056

Oct 17, 2010 7:29pm

Commander of Awesome;520157 wrote:Its like being a Jets/Reds fan. Bandwagon loser.

Pwned.

Ironman92

Posts: 49,363

Oct 17, 2010 7:36pm

I understand the run the rock and kill the clock.......but they do it with everyone knowing and less than 2 possession leads...yes, it works often but it didn't last game..

To me it keeps the other team in the game a little too much.

But as always...I'll take the win

Non

Posts: 9,517

Oct 17, 2010 7:42pm

I think the Steelers pounded the run game a lot more today than they will the rest of the season.

You saw when they wanted to open it up how quickly they got some big plays.

Ironman92

Posts: 49,363

Oct 17, 2010 7:49pm

I saw them take 2 1/2 qtrs of having the ball to score 7 points and then went 90 yard on 2 straight plays to set up 7 more.....after that they just about scored at will.

hangonsloopy

Posts: 1,291

Oct 17, 2010 7:51pm

Laley23;523283 wrote:see I dont think it was cheap. I just think it shouldve been flagged. The inconsistency on that shit is maddening.

Agreed. It's was more annoying that they weren't flagged, not the hits themselves. I don't think he did it intentionally either time.

bucks36

Posts: 182

Oct 17, 2010 8:49pm

Just got done reading the in game thread. Thanks for all the insight, Art Modell.

Can't believe there wasn't more discussion on the Steelers 2nd TD. When the whole offensive line moved before the ball was snapped and no flag. That was 3rd and goal at the 9, and would have moved it back to the 14. Not that this cost us the game, but officiating in this game was a joke. Ran it back 3 times on the DVR and couldn't believe no official saw this or the announcers made no mention of it.

Laley23

Posts: 29,506

Oct 17, 2010 8:52pm

bucks36;523445 wrote:Just got done reading the in game thread. Thanks for all the insight, Art Modell.

Can't believe there wasn't more discussion on the Steelers 2nd TD. When the whole offensive line moved before the ball was snapped and no flag. That was 3rd and goal at the 9, and would have moved it back to the 14. Not that this cost us the game, but officiating in this game was a joke. Ran it back 3 times on the DVR and couldn't believe no official saw this or the announcers made no mention of it.

I think more of us were disgusted with Eric Wrights attempt at a tackle.

Art Modell

Posts: 2,338

Oct 17, 2010 8:54pm

bucks36;523445 wrote:Just got done reading the in game thread. Thanks for all the insight, Art Modell.

Can't believe there wasn't more discussion on the Steelers 2nd TD. When the whole offensive line moved before the ball was snapped and no flag. That was 3rd and goal at the 9, and would have moved it back to the 14. Not that this cost us the game, but officiating in this game was a joke. Ran it back 3 times on the DVR and couldn't believe no official saw this or the announcers made no mention of it.

You mean the same officiating that allowed Joe Thomas to hold and put a stranglehold on Harrison all day. I guess its a good thing or there would've been more Clowns talking to theirselves on the sideline. LOL.

wes_mantooth

Posts: 17,977

Oct 17, 2010 8:57pm

Laley23;523449 wrote:I think more of us were disgusted with Eric Wrights attempt at a tackle.

Exactly. Definitely movement, but EWright was a more interesting topic of discussion.

Laley23

Posts: 29,506

Oct 17, 2010 8:59pm

wes_mantooth;523454 wrote:Exactly. Definitely movement, but EWright was a more interesting topic of discussion.

Plus after that it became apparent we could win at any moment by getting the ball to Watson. We werent really concerned with giving up the points.

wes_mantooth

Posts: 17,977

Oct 17, 2010 8:59pm

Laley23;523456 wrote:Plus after that it became apparent we could win at any moment by getting the ball to Watson. We werent really concerned with giving up the points.

True....I honestly thought it would be a repeat of Auburn/Arkansas.

I thought it would be the..

Cleveland Watsons 63
Pittsburgh Steelers 45

THE4RINGZ

Posts: 16,816

Oct 17, 2010 9:05pm

Wes must have found a bottle of New Philadelphia's best moonshine

wes_mantooth

Posts: 17,977

Oct 17, 2010 9:22pm

I wish!!!!

Sent from my ADR6300 using Tapatalk

KR1245

Posts: 4,317

Oct 17, 2010 9:56pm

Just finished reading the game thread. The Browns really need some offensive weapons, losing Cribbs certainly didnt help. I dont think the defense played that bad of a game. They were put in some pretty tough spots (dropped punt and int)

I thought Colt played a solid game. I didnt see the final numbers but he had to be close to 300 yards of total offense with a 65% completion percentage........I'll take that, especially for the kids first NFL start. Its one one game but I was pretty impressed

Ben Watson was the best player on the field

killer_ewok

Posts: 11,379

Oct 17, 2010 9:57pm

KR1245;523546 wrote:Just finished reading the game thread. The Browns really need some offensive weapons, losing Cribbs certainly didnt help. I dont think the defense played that bad of a game. They were put in some pretty tough spots (dropped punt and int)

I thought Colt played a solid game. I didnt see the final numbers but he had to be close to 300 yards of total offense with a 65% completion percentage........I'll take that, especially for the kids first NFL start. Its one one game but I was pretty impressed

Ben Watson was the best player on the field

Seriously?