wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Oct 17, 2010 2:13pm
raiderbuck;522957 wrote:Wow...refs, really? Really?
lol...yeah, that is ridiculous....oh well.
dazedconfused
Posts: 2,662
Oct 17, 2010 2:13pm
slingshot4ever;522956 wrote:Wow, they actually threw a flag this time....what a thug...
for delay of game on mack
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Oct 17, 2010 2:14pm
Well.......McCoy bout got his guy killed.
iclfan2
Posts: 6,360
Oct 17, 2010 2:14pm
No penalty again?
S
slingshot4ever
Posts: 4,085
Oct 17, 2010 2:15pm
Why not call a pass play on 3rd and 9? Just a thought.....
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Oct 17, 2010 2:15pm
The refs should be fined for that one. I won't feel bad if someone chop blocks Harrison right on his kneecap
Glory Days
Posts: 7,809
Oct 17, 2010 2:16pm
I drain 3's;522954 wrote:When he runs, he's tucking the ball to run. Not to buy extra time and find somebody open. He's not keeping his eyes down field.
Yeah I know what they say but so? I'd rather have him protect the ball and gain 5 yards than throw an off balance pass.
Sykotyk
Posts: 1,155
Oct 17, 2010 2:16pm
These refs are a joke. And the explanation on why it was okay to nail Cribbs in the head is a joke.
iclfan2
Posts: 6,360
Oct 17, 2010 2:16pm
Really, 3rd and 9 and a hand off. C'mon.
S
slingshot4ever
Posts: 4,085
Oct 17, 2010 2:16pm
Another great punt....
THE4RINGZ
Posts: 16,816
Oct 17, 2010 2:16pm
Hodges for MVP
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Oct 17, 2010 2:17pm
Glory Days;522960 wrote:Yeah I don't have a problem with a 6 yard gain on a qb scramble.
Same, there was one play though he was in a perfect pocket, and ran for absolutely no reason. I think the announcer is holding that play against him now.
N
NilesPacMan
Posts: 452
Oct 17, 2010 2:19pm
Fair catch kick?
Edit: Not smart enough to catch it to apply that rule.
Edit: Not smart enough to catch it to apply that rule.
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Oct 17, 2010 2:19pm
Maybe Harrison reads this site and took offense to love of mashing Bradshaw.
Or he's just full steam ahead at all time. Shot on Cribbs was part of the play.....shot on the receiver was a big eye play that 95% of defenders cannot pass up knocking their head off.
Or he's just full steam ahead at all time. Shot on Cribbs was part of the play.....shot on the receiver was a big eye play that 95% of defenders cannot pass up knocking their head off.
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Oct 17, 2010 2:20pm
lol..nice punt return
S
slingshot4ever
Posts: 4,085
Oct 17, 2010 2:20pm
Why not make them kick again and attmept an all out block....
hangonsloopy
Posts: 1,291
Oct 17, 2010 2:21pm
Ironman92;522982 wrote:Maybe Harrison reads this site and took offense to love of mashing Bradshaw.
Or he's just full steam ahead at all time. Shot on Cribbs was part of the play.....shot on the receiver was a big eye play that 95% of defenders cannot pass up knocking their head off.
Maybe. Its still a penalty though.
dazedconfused
Posts: 2,662
Oct 17, 2010 2:21pm
what was that about?
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Oct 17, 2010 2:21pm
slingshot4ever;522986 wrote:Why not make them kick again and attmept an all out block....
My thoughts exactly. They went out of their way to call two timeouts to get the punt, so why not have them punt it again?
O
outdoorsman
Posts: 417
Oct 17, 2010 2:22pm
slingshot4ever;522986 wrote:Why not make them kick again and attmept an all out block....
Because Cleveland has no balls. They feel lucky to be this close.
THE4RINGZ
Posts: 16,816
Oct 17, 2010 2:22pm
Coaching staff fail.
Glory Days
Posts: 7,809
Oct 17, 2010 2:23pm
Yeah I don't know why they didn't all out rush last time.
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Oct 17, 2010 2:23pm
I would have no problem with a penalty on the 2nd one...it was a penalty.
I hate referees..pretty much all of them.
How can they not see all this stuff that is to the eye obvious?
I hate referees..pretty much all of them.
How can they not see all this stuff that is to the eye obvious?
dazedconfused
Posts: 2,662
Oct 17, 2010 2:24pm
like_that;522989 wrote:My thoughts exactly. They went out of their way to call two timeouts to get the punt, so why not have them punt it again?
there would have been an untimed down somewhere, correct? either making them re-kick from their endzone or untimed down from about midfield? i dont get not even trying at all
THE4RINGZ
Posts: 16,816
Oct 17, 2010 2:28pm
The first Harrison hit should have been a penalty. The second one I can't see if it was a clear shot to the head. Looks like he may have made contact initially in the shoulders but the defenseless reciever rule should have been enforced