Week 5: (19) Michigan def. Indiana, 42-35

Home ▸ Archive ▸ College Sports ▸ Week 5: (19) Michigan def. Indiana, 42-35
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Oct 1, 2010 11:12 PM
You should have stayed in high school so your written word wouldn't be that of a middle schooler. So juvenile. LOLOLOL
Oct 1, 2010 11:12pm
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Oct 1, 2010 11:15 PM
And DR whined about a baby bruise or wouldn't have been taken out. My point is the big boys play with injuries, unlike the little boys.
Oct 1, 2010 11:15pm
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Oct 1, 2010 11:29 PM
WebFire;503772 wrote:So what does your list prove? That backs from other teams are bigger? There is not proof in your post that says DR will get hurt.

Looks like you are the embarrassment.

The first thing it proves is that you're intellect is lacking.

IF you could read and IF you had above average comprehension skills you would see the ONLY thing the list was meant to prove is that 31187 was a bald face liar when he said DR "is as big as PLENTY of d1 running backs." My list shows DR is MUCH smaller than every starting QB and RB in the Big Ten.

NOW who's the embarrassment??? With each subsequent post you look more like Dumb & Dumber.
Oct 1, 2010 11:29pm
Hb31187's avatar

Hb31187

Senior Member

8,534 posts
Oct 1, 2010 11:34 PM
So how about this for comprehension Paladin/Big Gain.....I said hes as big as plenty of d1 running backs. I did not say he is as big as plenty of big ten running backs. All running backs that play d1 football are obviously not in the big 10 so.... Fail
Oct 1, 2010 11:34pm
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Oct 1, 2010 11:40 PM
Hb31187;504121 wrote:So how about this for comprehension Paladin/Big Gain.....I said hes as big as plenty of d1 running backs. I did not say he is as big as plenty of big ten running backs. All running backs that play d1 football are obviously not in the big 10 so.... Fail
You are such a dunce. If DR is as big as "PLENTY of d1 running backs" as you say, one would think he'd be at least close to the size of one QB or RB in the Big Ten. Yet another post proving how doltish you are.
Oct 1, 2010 11:40pm
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Oct 1, 2010 11:43 PM
Hb31187;503749 wrote:and he should of stayed with track because he cant make a cut to save his life lol.

And you should HAVE stayed in school to improve you writing skills beyond that of a middle schooler.
Oct 1, 2010 11:43pm
Hb31187's avatar

Hb31187

Senior Member

8,534 posts
Oct 1, 2010 11:51 PM
Denard is bout 6'0-6'1 depending on where you see him listed. and listed between 188 and 193

Kendal Hunter top 5 in the nation in rushing 5'8 197
Ronnie Hillman top 5 int he nation in rushing 5'10 175
Taylor Martinez top 10 in the nation in rushing 6'1-185
Lamichael James one of the best RB prospects in the nation and top 10 in rushing 5-9 180
Derrick Locke top 10 int he nastion in rushing 5'9 191


So basically 6 out of the top 10 in the nation in rushing are around Denards size....and whos the dunce? HAHAHAH nice fail Big Gain. And thats just glancing at the best, im sure there are MANY others his size if the majority in the top 10 are his size as well....
Oct 1, 2010 11:51pm
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Oct 1, 2010 11:51 PM
WebFire;503772 wrote:So what does your list prove? That backs from other teams are bigger? There is not proof in your post that says DR will get hurt.

Looks like you are the embarrassment.
IF you could read and IF you had above average comprehension skills you would have recognized that the ONLY thing my post was meant to prove was that 31187 was a bald faced liar when he said DR was "as big as PLENTY of d1 running backs".

Now who's the embarrassed one? With each subsequent post you look more like "Dumb & Dumber".
Oct 1, 2010 11:51pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Oct 1, 2010 11:57 PM
Ummm as Hb just pointed out, Robinson is "as big as PLENTY of d1 running backs". He is as big as some very good backs as well.
Oct 1, 2010 11:57pm
Hb31187's avatar

Hb31187

Senior Member

8,534 posts
Oct 2, 2010 12:01 AM
Just wait Karen, hell try to spin it any way he possibly can so that he looks correct lol
Oct 2, 2010 12:01am
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Oct 2, 2010 12:05 AM
No doubt. He is trying to think something up right now.
Oct 2, 2010 12:05am
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Oct 2, 2010 12:05 AM
Hb31187;504145 wrote:Denard is bout 6'0-6'1 depending on where you see him listed. and listed between 188 and 193

Kendal Hunter top 5 in the nation in rushing 5'8 197
Ronnie Hillman top 5 int he nation in rushing 5'10 175
Taylor Martinez top 10 in the nation in rushing 6'1-185
Lamichael James one of the best RB prospects in the nation and top 10 in rushing 5-9 180
Derrick Locke top 10 int he nastion in rushing 5'9 191


So basically 6 out of the top 10 in the nation in rushing are around Denards size....and whos the dunce? HAHAHAH nice fail Big Gain. And thats just glancing at the best, im sure there are MANY others his size if the majority in the top 10 are his size as well....

I gave 24 examples of QBs and RBs, 2 from EVERY team in the Big Ten, that are MUCH bigger than DR and the best you can do is give us 5 examples of RBs that are "around Denards size"??? Five isn't close to "PLENTY". You can't see how that makes YOU the dunce???? Thanks for playing, each post makes you look like a bigger fool.

More proof of your stupidity...five out of ten IS NOT " a majority". LOLO.... a laughing stock.
Oct 2, 2010 12:05am
Hb31187's avatar

Hb31187

Senior Member

8,534 posts
Oct 2, 2010 12:07 AM
See Karen lol, even when proven wrong he finds some way to spin it so that in his own little world hes correct
Oct 2, 2010 12:07am
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Oct 2, 2010 12:09 AM
lolololol good work Big Gain!!!!!
Oct 2, 2010 12:09am
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Oct 2, 2010 12:12 AM
Big Gain;504166 wrote:More proof of your stupidity...five out of ten IS NOT " a majority". LOLO.... a laughing stock.


He gave 5 of the top 10 that were around the same size as Robinson. Add in Robinson, since he is also one of the top rushers along with being about the same size as himself, and that makes 6. So 6 out of 10 would be a majority, would it not? Go ahead and spin that too.



And you speak of reading comprehension...
Oct 2, 2010 12:12am
Hb31187's avatar

Hb31187

Senior Member

8,534 posts
Oct 2, 2010 12:12 AM
and btw you gave me 22 examples. You included all 11 other teams aside from Michigan in the big 10. 11x2=22....dunce
Oct 2, 2010 12:12am
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Oct 2, 2010 12:24 AM
Hb31187;504169 wrote:See Karen lol, even when proven wrong he finds some way to spin it so that in his own little world hes correct

More proof of your ignorance concerning college football. You continue to say "d1", there is NO SUCH THING in college football. There are approx.120 schools in "NCAA Division 1A".

Proven wrong??? You've proven nothing. There's a total of 240 starting QBs and RBs in "1A" football. You're sampling of 5 is NO WHERE close to "PLENTY". Give us 24 like was on my EXAMPLE list, looking at JUST ONE BSC Conference.

FYI, when losers of debates are desperate they always result to the old worn out "spin" whine.
Oct 2, 2010 12:24am
Hb31187's avatar

Hb31187

Senior Member

8,534 posts
Oct 2, 2010 12:29 AM
My point remains that if 6 out of the top 10 best rushers in college football are Denard Robinsons size. Then there will be MANY that are his size if i really felt like looking through all 120 teams. Do I want to do that to prove a point to a stubborn jackass though? No.

Also, unless theyre running QBs....what would QBs have to do with this? I said hes as big as plenty of D1 running backs, I can understand you including option Qbs...but not standard drop back Qbs.
Oct 2, 2010 12:29am
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Oct 2, 2010 12:31 AM
karen lotz;504158 wrote:Ummm as Hb just pointed out, Robinson is "as big as PLENTY of d1 running backs". He is as big as some very good backs as well.
Hmmm, you're dumber than "Dumb & Dumber". How is 5 "PLENTY" when there are 240 starting QBs and RBs in in 1A?
Oct 2, 2010 12:31am
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Oct 2, 2010 12:36 AM
Hb31187;504202 wrote:My point remains that if 6 out of the top 10 best rushers in college football are Denard Robinsons size. Then there will be MANY that are his size if i really felt like looking through all 120 teams. Do I want to do that to prove a point to a stubborn jackass though? No

Your ORIGINAL "point" was that DR was as big as "PLENTY of d1 running backs" You HAVE NOT proven that.

You're the LAZY "jackass". I did 12 TIMES the research you did. Give us 17 more examples and we're tied, then I'll do more research.
Oct 2, 2010 12:36am
Hb31187's avatar

Hb31187

Senior Member

8,534 posts
Oct 2, 2010 12:37 AM
You sure you got those numbers right? I mean you were confused with your math earlier. Unless im mistaken and 11x2=24? Maybe you could tag along with me to middle school and learn your times tables.


And like i said what do traditional QBs have to do with me saying hes as big as plenty of D1 running backs? The vast majority of big 10 Qbs you listed are pocket passers. But im done with this, im not gonna spend my time looking up the height and weight of hundreds of Running backs because you fail to surrender to common sense. If 6 of the top 10 are Denards size, many would be and more than likely are his size.
Oct 2, 2010 12:37am
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Oct 2, 2010 12:52 AM
karen lotz;504178 wrote:He gave 5 of the top 10 that were around the same size as Robinson. Add in Robinson, since he is also one of the top rushers along with being about the same size as himself, and that makes 6. So 6 out of 10 would be a majority, would it not? Go ahead and spin that too.



And you speak of reading comprehension...

LOLOLOL..... Robinson "is about the same size as himself".
Oct 2, 2010 12:52am
Hb31187's avatar

Hb31187

Senior Member

8,534 posts
Oct 2, 2010 12:54 AM
Smh
Oct 2, 2010 12:54am
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Oct 2, 2010 1:02 AM
Big Gain;504228 wrote:LOLOLOL..... Robinson "is about the same size as himself".


Yes, I threw that in there because you are too stupid to figure that out on your own. Its obvious Hb was including him in the top 10 since he the leading rusher. You forgot to include him when you said your 5 out of 10 isn't a majority comment. Do you understand that or do I need to type slower?
Oct 2, 2010 1:02am
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Oct 2, 2010 1:21 AM
Hb31187;504219 wrote:You sure you got those numbers right? I mean you were confused with your math earlier. Unless im mistaken and 11x2=24? Maybe you could tag along with me to middle school and learn your times tables.


And like i said what do traditional QBs have to do with me saying hes as big as plenty of D1 running backs? The vast majority of big 10 Qbs you listed are pocket passers. But im done with this, im not gonna spend my time looking up the height and weight of hundreds of Running backs because you fail to surrender to common sense. If 6 of the top 10 are Denards size, many would be and more than likely are his size.
You got me there, congratulations, I added the new Big Ten member to the Big 11 and included Michigan and Robinson. Yep that misspeak is the same as you saying 5 is a large enough sample size to satisfy your "PLENTY" number. You've got to do better than that.

You are right about one thing, DR is not a "traditional QB". RichRod's gimmick offense puts Robinson in a group of one. Is Pryor a "traditional QB"? Was Troy Smith a "traditional QB"? Was Craig Krenzel a "traditional QB"? They were all pocket passers and they all ran/run a lot. EVERY QB in the country, regardless of where you want to pigeonhole them, MUST run the football. They all most avoid a pass rush. They all scramble. Most of them roll out. All of them QB Sneak. A naked roll out is used on occasion. A few QBs will become a pass receiver. When carrying out a fake they are subject to contact. Aren't defenses allowed to tackle QB's carrying out their role of "traditional QBs"???
Oct 2, 2010 1:21am