ytownfootball;491663 wrote:Not completely lotz, he reads defenses better, seems quite a bit more poised to me, I'm speaking more to the heady portions of the game, short passes is more part of athleticism to me.
I think it has more to do with mechanics than athleticism, because Pryor is super athletic.
enigmaax;491748 wrote:Maybe not before their careers played out. But we have the benefit of hindsight and we are evaluating history, not who we thought we'd want more before they were done. If you gave me my choice to have Trent Dilfer and win a Super Bowl or Dan Marino and not win a Super Bowl, I'd take Trent Dilfer, yes.
That's not the question, it's not who has done what, it's who is the better QB. Just as this list is to rank who the best OSU QB's are; a list with who the best NFL QB's are would have Marino much higher than Dilfer. Factoring in wins in certain games doesn't amount to whom the best QB is at any level.
For the record, I have no problem with you thinking Boeckman is the better of the two at the moment. I just don't happen to agree with it. IMO, Pryor overall is the better of the two. Yes, Boeckman had the better arm (at this point), but he wasn't elusive and couldn't make plays. Pryor has 2 years to get a NC and I believe he will have one by the time he leaves OSU. JMO