data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/952f4/952f48c68a77f58aaa2b184e42d03f71935c97c7" alt="karen lotz's avatar"
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Oct 19, 2010 7:38pm
Classyposter58;525223 wrote:Lol Galion was garbage and I even picked you guys over them on Huddle. I'd compare you and Clear Fork more to the game you guys played after Galion against OG. Lol you remember last years Week 12 game?
Your signature is amusing. Where was Genoa prior to the last 4 years? No titles since 1994?? It will be interesting to see what happens to the program once Vicars moves on. I'm sure you will be just as classy then.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce734/ce734b647c20243ebb9440f668ab75eb54fa16ad" alt="RedRider1's avatar"
RedRider1
Posts: 3,850
Oct 19, 2010 8:04pm
thePITman;525377 wrote:We only have 1 WCAL non-league game, Waynedale, who normally has a more successful year. Otherwise, two of our non-league games are OCC opponents. LoL!
As long as WH is in the OCC, you're not going to get many 2nd level points from them. You're right though...most years Waynedale is a good opponent to have.
I do think a decent middle of the road team in central Ohio in a bigger division (maybe like a Mans. Madison) would be a nice points game for you.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3540a/3540ae59f1cc871569c0f6b09e870105fd427bf7" alt="thePITman's avatar"
thePITman
Posts: 3,867
Oct 19, 2010 9:51pm
Everyone has room for improvement in their schedules, and we're no different; but having 3 intense backyard rivals as our 3 non-league games fits us perfectly. The fact that at least 2 of them (Waynedale, Orrville) normally have successful seasons and the other (West Holmes) being a bigger school (DIII), it can help us a little bit. But we just have to win games. Period. Then worry about the rest later.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08267/08267956b8a386530b56090faa49820aa0615a90" alt="OQB's avatar"
OQB
Posts: 6,679
Oct 19, 2010 10:04pm
I would like to see us bring Dover back. If not them a Wadsworth, Jackson, or Timken would be nice bigger opponents, but winnable games. Leave Triway for basketball...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3540a/3540ae59f1cc871569c0f6b09e870105fd427bf7" alt="thePITman's avatar"
thePITman
Posts: 3,867
Oct 19, 2010 10:19pm
OrrvilleQB;525598 wrote:I would like to see us bring Dover back. If not them a Wadsworth, Jackson, or Timken would be nice bigger opponents, but winnable games. Leave Triway for basketball...
I'm sorry our 8 wins is not enough for you.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08267/08267956b8a386530b56090faa49820aa0615a90" alt="OQB's avatar"
OQB
Posts: 6,679
Oct 19, 2010 10:21pm
you don't have 8 wins yet.....
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3540a/3540ae59f1cc871569c0f6b09e870105fd427bf7" alt="thePITman's avatar"
thePITman
Posts: 3,867
Oct 19, 2010 10:44pm
OrrvilleQB;525610 wrote:you don't have 8 wins yet.....
We did last year.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08267/08267956b8a386530b56090faa49820aa0615a90" alt="OQB's avatar"
OQB
Posts: 6,679
Oct 19, 2010 10:49pm
Want a cookie?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3540a/3540ae59f1cc871569c0f6b09e870105fd427bf7" alt="thePITman's avatar"
thePITman
Posts: 3,867
Oct 19, 2010 10:50pm
OrrvilleQB;525634 wrote:Want a cookie?
LoL, no thanks. I appreciate the offer.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eaea8/eaea801aee701e7434b6c3a32e51ba19016a9d50" alt="THE4RINGZ's avatar"
THE4RINGZ
Posts: 16,816
Oct 19, 2010 10:54pm
I predicted eight wins this season and unless lightening strikes I will be correct.
We didn't get the second level points this year because the PAC is a little down this year.
We didn't get the second level points this year because the PAC is a little down this year.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08267/08267956b8a386530b56090faa49820aa0615a90" alt="OQB's avatar"
OQB
Posts: 6,679
Oct 19, 2010 11:01pm
haha ok just thought I'd offer! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bab7f/bab7f5d0e696af403120ce279c31a0b9128ea5a4" alt=":D"
I just think it was better when we had Dover on the schedule, and I know a lot of other people who do too. Nothing against Triway, but I like that rivalry for basketball...not football.
I just think it was better when we had Dover on the schedule, and I know a lot of other people who do too. Nothing against Triway, but I like that rivalry for basketball...not football.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de341/de341c5dd4f81cb0191d371a4d4f62de9a43fa77" alt="riders1's avatar"
riders1
Posts: 2,275
Oct 19, 2010 11:15pm
thePITman;525588 wrote:Everyone has room for improvement in their schedules, and we're no different; but having 3 intense backyard rivals as our 3 non-league games fits us perfectly. The fact that at least 2 of them (Waynedale, Orrville) normally have successful seasons and the other (West Holmes) being a bigger school (DIII), it can help us a little bit. But we just have to win games. Period. Then worry about the rest later.
Still Waynedale is DV with a mostly DV and DVI schedule which leaves .5 to a full 1 point less for you than a decent 4 to 6 wins from a DIII or DIV school which .5 to 1 last year would have put you ahead of us.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de341/de341c5dd4f81cb0191d371a4d4f62de9a43fa77" alt="riders1's avatar"
riders1
Posts: 2,275
Oct 19, 2010 11:18pm
OrrvilleQB;525644 wrote:haha ok just thought I'd offer!
I just think it was better when we had Dover on the schedule, and I know a lot of other people who do too. Nothing against Triway, but I like that rivalry for basketball...not football.
I agree with that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08267/08267956b8a386530b56090faa49820aa0615a90" alt="OQB's avatar"
OQB
Posts: 6,679
Oct 19, 2010 11:19pm
exactly riders1, lol we finally agree on something!
ps, you got mail.
ps, you got mail.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3540a/3540ae59f1cc871569c0f6b09e870105fd427bf7" alt="thePITman's avatar"
thePITman
Posts: 3,867
Oct 19, 2010 11:21pm
riders1;525652 wrote:Still Waynedale is DV with a mostly DV and DVI schedule which leaves .5 to a full 1 point less for you than a decent 4 to 6 wins from a DIII or DIV school which .5 to 1 last year would have put you ahead of us.
That 0.5 extra would have gotten divided by 10 (our number of games played) and then the L2's divided by 10 as well (multiplied by 10 then divided by L2 divisor of 100), so that 0.5 wouldn't have bumped us over you. Speaking of local rivals which we like to schedule, though, I've always wanted to schedule Wooster, and maybe soon we'll be able to work that out. Having 3 OCC non-league games could help us in the long run, I think, both playing up division-wise and competition-wise.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de341/de341c5dd4f81cb0191d371a4d4f62de9a43fa77" alt="riders1's avatar"
riders1
Posts: 2,275
Oct 19, 2010 11:32pm
The .5 is after the math , we had a total of 203.5 full value points, you had 202.5 full value , after the 10th game simply move your decimal over one spot to finish at 20.35 and 20.25 and add that .5 to that and you have 20.75 moving ahead of us. You had 1 less level 2 point than we did, say the difference between 1 win against a DIII to a DV. ( 5 pts to 4 pts.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3540a/3540ae59f1cc871569c0f6b09e870105fd427bf7" alt="thePITman's avatar"
thePITman
Posts: 3,867
Oct 19, 2010 11:38pm
Gotcha. I think I misread your first post incorrectly.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/241f9/241f9d4fe5410d9a5e43866e5e348cd864e54220" alt="Classyposter58's avatar"
Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
Oct 19, 2010 11:40pm
karen lotz;525407 wrote:Your signature is amusing. Where was Genoa prior to the last 4 years? No titles since 1994?? It will be interesting to see what happens to the program once Vicars moves on. I'm sure you will be just as classy then.
Sour grapes? Ha take your Runner Up awards and go home. Don't forget Genoa was pretty solid in the 70s and 80s
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08267/08267956b8a386530b56090faa49820aa0615a90" alt="OQB's avatar"
OQB
Posts: 6,679
Oct 19, 2010 11:42pm
He'll see the talent level decrease and look for something bigger....bound to happen.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de341/de341c5dd4f81cb0191d371a4d4f62de9a43fa77" alt="riders1's avatar"
riders1
Posts: 2,275
Oct 19, 2010 11:42pm
thePITman;525680 wrote:Gotcha. I think I misread your first post incorrectly.
Is that a double negative ?
G
GCTD64
Posts: 40
Oct 19, 2010 11:47pm
OrrvilleQB;525687 wrote:He'll see the talent level decrease and look for something bigger....bound to happen.
Talent level looks pretty good in grades coming up! That should in no way be the case for him leaving in the next few years at least... Not to say he wont leave, just saying it won't be because of lack of talent.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08267/08267956b8a386530b56090faa49820aa0615a90" alt="OQB's avatar"
OQB
Posts: 6,679
Oct 19, 2010 11:49pm
lol recruiting the pee wee leagues in NW ohio huh getting talent in the system early....
haha all in fun!
G
GCTD64
Posts: 40
Oct 19, 2010 11:54pm
Lol.. Not exactly but there are some good athletes in the younger grades (8th-Juniors). I see no reason we would be short of talent in coming years.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08267/08267956b8a386530b56090faa49820aa0615a90" alt="OQB's avatar"
OQB
Posts: 6,679
Oct 20, 2010 12:00am
haha, thank you for not gettin ticked off at that! Sounds like Genoa has a great thing going for them. And for their sake, I hope Vicars does stay he has done some great things there.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/952f4/952f48c68a77f58aaa2b184e42d03f71935c97c7" alt="karen lotz's avatar"
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Oct 20, 2010 12:13am
I just don't understand the reasoning behind putting that about Eastwood in your sig. Did Genoa finish second each of the 5 years of Eastwood's run? I don't think so.Classyposter58;525685 wrote:Sour grapes? Ha take your Runner Up awards and go home. Don't forget Genoa was pretty solid in the 70s and 80s