GoChiefs;459502 wrote:Uh..no. This was all being planned out way before that.

Heretic;459539 wrote:So there you have it. The only reason rules haven't been posted much earlier is because Justin sucks at life. Straight from his fingers to your eyes.

justincredible;459533 wrote:I created a thread on 8/01 in the mod forum stating that I needed to get rules posted on the new software. The large influx of new users and the start of the football season are why the rules we posted now. My laziness is the only reason this wasn't done months ago.

justincredible;459533 wrote:I created a thread on 8/01 in the mod forum stating that I needed to get rules posted on the new software. The large influx of new users and the start of the football season are why the rules we posted now. My laziness is the only reason this wasn't done months ago.

wes_mantooth;459673 wrote:This thread is bizarre

bases_loaded;459595 wrote:Ok we get it, you made an unoriginal site...

bases_loaded;459595 wrote:Ok we get it, you made an unoriginal site and forgot you had rules...lets talk about how stupid the phrase "LOLZ" is, thats where the direction of this thread should be headed. How does one "laugh out loudz", you can't have multiple louds.

justincredible;459789 wrote:Awwww...my feelings are hurt.

It may be an unoriginal site (all forums are, essentially) but of all the ones that popped up after the backlash it is the only one that has lasted.

bases_loaded;459808 wrote:That was tongue in cheek, its a shame you backed down to JJ's "lawyers" just think of how much bigger the site would be without the name change.

ts1227;459806 wrote:You seem to enjoy it enough though, lots of posts and have been here since the beginning.

bases_loaded;459808 wrote:That was tongue in cheek, its a shame you backed down to JJ's "lawyers" just think of how much bigger the site would be without the name change.

bases_loaded;459808 wrote:That was tongue in cheek, its a shame you backed down to JJ's "lawyers" just think of how much bigger the site would be without the name change.

justincredible;459817 wrote:What you call "backing down" I call an obvious financial decision. Why potentially spend tens of thousands of dollars in court to keep the name of a website that generates peanuts in revenue?

bases_loaded;459821 wrote:I can't believe they had any ground to stand on, they act like they came up with the idea of a website with forums. Did they own the rights to "huddle"?

justincredible;459817 wrote:What you call "backing down" I call an obvious financial decision. Why potentially spend tens of thousands of dollars in court to keep the name of a website that generates peanuts in revenue?

Tigerfan00;459833 wrote:This is the only site that lasted after the exodus from JJs?

What happened to Mike Clarks Ohio Sports Forum?

bases_loaded;459821 wrote:I can't believe they had any ground to stand on, they act like they came up with the idea of a website with forums. Did they own the rights to "huddle"?

justincredible;459842 wrote:Regardless of whether they had a leg to stand on or not lawyers cost money, as LJ said. And it wasn't worth risking my financial future to see if they had a leg to stand on or not. Had I fought and they won it would've crippled me financially.

bases_loaded;459980 wrote:I understand your position, I just think I would've called their bluff...and if they won and crippled you, you could write a book about it and make millions on how fucked up this country is.