even if they did have radar, how would they argue it? its like the radar gun at a baseball game, all the proof of your speed goes away with the next car etc. there is no record of the speed recorded digitally or anything that they bring to court besides what they write on your ticket.hoops23;456949 wrote:If they don't need radar to pull you over, how do they argue it if you go to court for it?
bullshit article is correct. haha that article misses the point even though they have it explained by the people they invterviewed. cops who have been on the job for years and have receieved speed training can estimate speeds pretty damn good. even most cops who use radar have to determine the speed of the car before they turn it on to get your exact speed. plus new cops, like stated in the article, wont use the "guessing" method. they can just drive behind you going the same speed you are to determine your speed if they wanted to(i believe this is the preferred method in California). no radar is used then either.Mohican00;456957 wrote:Here's your bullshit for the day: Link