isadore;452111 wrote:E mail 2:31 PM
mmmhmmm, exactly what I said earlier. That from personal experience, I said with he poster who requested the post be removed.
isadore;452111 wrote:E mail 2:31 PM
LJ;452068 wrote:See, there you go again. You may THINK they do, but the only person who truly knows that is me and I can tell you 100% that they do not.
jordo212000;452113 wrote:Case in point for why the current way doing things sucks. Do you realize how lame that sounds?
isadore;452119 wrote:I have seen it in operation
LJ;452117 wrote:mmmhmmm, exactly what I said earlier. That from personal experience, I said with he poster who requested the post be removed.
LJ;452120 wrote:do you realize that any politics forum worth a shit has the almost the same rules and has the same approval system as this one?
LJ;452117 wrote:mmmhmmm, exactly what I said earlier. That from personal experience, I said with he poster who requested the post be removed.
UA5straightin2008;452143 wrote:dude get the FUCK OVER IT!! you are more of a bitch than gibby
isadore;452147 wrote:thank you for your input on this subject.
justincredible;452151 wrote:The easiest solution us to just get rid of political discussion all together. Personally, I'd prefer that.
UA5straightin2008;452152 wrote:no problem douche, get a fuckin life and quit crying on a internet forum, no one is begging you to stay, no one is making you stay, if you dont like the way its run, why dont you leave? does that make sense to you?
isadore;452144 wrote:personal experience with the poster asking for removal. Oh he is a buddy of yours. No prejudice did not play a role in the removal of my comments. I just happened to critize someone you had "personal experiences" with.
isadore;452128 wrote:lol talk about trying to weasel out of your own words.
isadore;452135 wrote:that control makes the site for shit, it limits or denies discussion as can be seen in the topics under discussion here. A thread not allowed that very much should have been discussed. A description a contributor earns by his statements about killers of Americans. Both forced out of a political discussion.
LJ;452159 wrote:what? I don't know the poster. What the fuck are you even talking about?
that is what you wroteLJ wrote:mmmhmmm, exactly what I said earlier. That from personal experience, I said with he poster who requested the post be removed.
isadore;452170 wrote:that is what you wrote
LJ;452160 wrote:Not at all. Maybe IN YOUR MIND
LJ wrote:it's personal from his end, as he requested that a stop be put to the shenanigans. My not reversing it no matter what you say, is personal.
isadore;452180 wrote:these words on acting on the personal not the objective
You just wrote just the opposite.LJ;452176 wrote:Mhhmm, that from personal experience WITH YOU ( i thought that was a given, we WERE talking about my supposed grudge against you right?) I side with the poster who requested the post be removed. I don't know them one bit. Of course, in your mind, whatever you saw earlier is the truth and you don't give a fuck what the person who knows the actual truth has to say.