Actually it has when you include benefits as part of total comp, which is the correct way to look at it. Of course, that's a form of socialism and I'd prefer a bit more flexibility - why should part of my comp, as a single guy, go to subsidize a guy with a wife and five kids?IggyPride00;448869 wrote:Problem is that for 30 years wages haven't kept up, and to fill the gap between rising prices and stagnant wages we put it on credit cards to make up the difference.
Living beyond one's means really has little to do with wages.