thedynasty1998;425100 wrote:Really?
I just cant get passed the whole putting something like this on Ebay a couple days after stealing it. This woman would truly have to be ratarded to do something like that. You could very well be right though.
thedynasty1998;425100 wrote:Really?
Rotinaj;425112 wrote:I just cant get passed the whole putting something like this on Ebay a couple days after stealing it. This woman would truly have to be ratarded to do something like that. You could very well be right though.
enigmaax;425068 wrote:Ha ha. Someone has your property, you try to get it back, and you are the piece of shit. And anyone who knows you is a piece of shit.
SportsAndLady;425179 wrote:Oh yeah i'm sure you guys would take the thing back to the yardsale people and be like "oh you guys musta made a mistake, i bought this off you for 5 dollars and it's worth 2,000 times that...here have it back, i can't take this" hahahah
georgemc80;425156 wrote:So she was supposed to go back to the yard sale
I Wear Pants;425223 wrote:So the dude is allowed to falsely imprison people in his home then?
Fab4Runner;425233 wrote:I see no reason not to believe the woman bought this at a yard sale. Until it's proven she didn't why would we doubt her? If so, she legitimately purchased an item and it's now hers. If it was stolen somewhere along the line then I am sure the law will be followed and it will be worked out.
That said...it's amazing to me that some of you want to trash this woman when she was essentially held captive in someone's home. Do you think that was wrong or do you just want to defend one side here?
Either way...I am going to wait for more details before jumping to conclusions.
j_crazy;425266 wrote:if it was reported stolen, the women could not have had it appraised is my understanding.
So it's her that says it, but I think it's beleivable.But Robinson maintains she could not have had the jewelry certified by the I.G.S. if it were stolen property.
thedynasty1998;425317 wrote:Yea, she's an idiot and a thief.
hoops23;425328 wrote:Ok, you do realize she bought this at a yard sale FOUR years ago, right? FOUR YEARS AGO.
The Pendant was never reported stolen, NEVER.
She recently had it appraised, which from everything I've read, it impossible to do on stolen jewelry.
She found out it's worth and went to sell it on Ebay. I don't think she draws all this attention if it was stolen. She has been trying to open up her own gym, she finds out she's sitting on 10 grand and wants to sell it for profit obviously.
And WHY, WHY, WHY, would she go to MAverick Carters house if she stole it? You would NOT go there if you were indeed the thief. I mean seriously, you guys can't be stupid enough to believe that?
Then she's held captive in another home?
It is beyond my comprehension that anyone would defend holding someone captive to get back a necklace. There are court systems for a reason If something is stolen report it stolen. If you find who stole it turn them in.thedynasty1998;425343 wrote:See post above about getting it appraised.
She went to the house to get some money.
It's beyond my comprehension that anyone could believer her story.
Fab4Runner;425358 wrote:It is beyond my comprehension that anyone would defend holding someone captive to get back a necklace. There are court systems for a reason If something is stolen report it stolen. If you find who stole it turn them in.
Fab4Runner;425358 wrote:It is beyond my comprehension that anyone would defend holding someone captive to get back a necklace. There are court systems for a reason If something is stolen report it stolen. If you find who stole it turn them in.