Eddy Curry.....lol

Home Archive Pro Sports Eddy Curry.....lol
jpake1's avatar

jpake1

Senior Member

2,389 posts
May 26, 2010 4:38 PM
He's dumb, poor him. He made a lot of money and did some STUPID shit all on his on. 12 cars? I don't care if he's a chocolate face from the hood, that's a stupid motha fucka right there. I'm sure a few people put one on him in the business world. It could and would happen to any of us by smarter men in the business world. That part, I kinda feel for him. But in the end, he was an idiot as much as he was a stupid guy taken advantage of.
May 26, 2010 4:38pm
N

Nate

Formerly Known As Keebler

3,949 posts
May 26, 2010 4:45 PM
If he would have hired a smart agent, the agent would have helped prevent this also.
May 26, 2010 4:45pm
SQ_Crazies's avatar

SQ_Crazies

The Godfather

7,977 posts
May 26, 2010 4:52 PM
I'm absolutely not arguing that he's not an idiot. In fact I believe I said he didn't have a brain in my first post. LOL

And yeah, he could have hired this person and that person--that costs money too, money that doesn't seem to be worth spending when you're stupid and you have millions throw at you all at once. And something you guys have to realize is that those financial advisors and agents are exactly who could have been taking advantage of him. It's not like they're the most ethical people in the world.
May 26, 2010 4:52pm
jpake1's avatar

jpake1

Senior Member

2,389 posts
May 26, 2010 5:01 PM
Whose arguing with you? I'm certainly not. I just added more to my initial thought.
May 26, 2010 5:01pm
SQ_Crazies's avatar

SQ_Crazies

The Godfather

7,977 posts
May 26, 2010 5:07 PM
There isn't really an argument, I just don't agree with a few of the people who said he could have just hired someone and this never would have happened.
May 26, 2010 5:07pm
N

Nate

Formerly Known As Keebler

3,949 posts
May 26, 2010 5:19 PM
SQ_Crazies wrote: There isn't really an argument, I just don't agree with a few of the people who said he could have just hired someone and this never would have happened.
I agree that hiring someone may not have helped him 100% and maybe he did get bent over by an agent or something that did this. I just don't know how one could be that oblivious to the amount of money they make and the amount of money they are spending.
May 26, 2010 5:19pm
SQ_Crazies's avatar

SQ_Crazies

The Godfather

7,977 posts
May 26, 2010 6:46 PM
Because they're dumb. He's a poor person with money, get what I'm saying?
May 26, 2010 6:46pm
N

Nate

Formerly Known As Keebler

3,949 posts
May 27, 2010 9:14 AM
SQ_Crazies wrote: Because they're dumb. He's a poor person with money, get what I'm saying?
Yes, a word comes to mind, but its racist lol.
May 27, 2010 9:14am
SQ_Crazies's avatar

SQ_Crazies

The Godfather

7,977 posts
May 27, 2010 9:17 AM
No, it really isn't racist. Saying it's racist is like saying the term "reverse racism" makes sense.
May 27, 2010 9:17am
N

Nate

Formerly Known As Keebler

3,949 posts
May 27, 2010 9:49 AM
SQ_Crazies wrote: No, it really isn't racist. Saying it's racist is like saying the term "reverse racism" makes sense.
I'm just saying that a more descriptive, one word answer would be the perfect explanation.
May 27, 2010 9:49am
SQ_Crazies's avatar

SQ_Crazies

The Godfather

7,977 posts
May 27, 2010 9:51 AM
Agreed.


Can't wait to see us get pinned as racists over this. It WILL be hilarious, trust me.
May 27, 2010 9:51am
N

Nate

Formerly Known As Keebler

3,949 posts
May 27, 2010 9:54 AM
SQ_Crazies wrote: Agreed.


Can't wait to see us get pinned as racists over this. It WILL be hilarious, trust me.
It's true. I think those people probably are skipping this thread so we are safe. Anyways, that class of people exists just like white trash.
May 27, 2010 9:54am
SQ_Crazies's avatar

SQ_Crazies

The Godfather

7,977 posts
May 27, 2010 10:09 AM
It isn't a racism term just because it was at one time. I don't like to use it because I don't try to offend people (and regardless of how I feel, some are still offended), but when the people it's supposed to be offensive to use it more than anyone then it starts to take on a new meaning. And when you add that to the fact that racism is still alive but to a MUCH lesser degree in my generation--it's not nearly as big a deal.
May 27, 2010 10:09am
N

Nate

Formerly Known As Keebler

3,949 posts
May 27, 2010 10:18 AM
SQ_Crazies wrote: It isn't a racism term just because it was at one time. I don't like to use it because I don't try to offend people (and regardless of how I feel, some are still offended), but when the people it's supposed to be offensive to use it more than anyone then it starts to take on a new meaning. And when you add that to the fact that racism is still alive but to a MUCH lesser degree in my generation--it's not nearly as big a deal.
100% agree! If they don't want us crackers saying it, they shouldn't either.
May 27, 2010 10:18am