Todd McShay's Top 3 Heisman Contenders

Home Archive College Sports Todd McShay's Top 3 Heisman Contenders
C

charliehustle14

Senior Member

2,224 posts
Nov 20, 2009 2:43 PM
Spiller is tough. He's going to be huge at the next level. I look for him to have a Percy Harvin type impact as a rookie for whatever team he ends up with.
Nov 20, 2009 2:43pm
jhay78's avatar

jhay78

Senior Member

1,917 posts
Nov 20, 2009 4:05 PM
Elliot Stabler wrote: ^^^

Just like when Archie won his 2nd too
Fail-Bring some numbers next time to back up that nonsense.

As long as you're inserting Archie into the conversation, he could've easily won it his sophomore year as well. Might as well give it to him this year too if people are considering Tebow.
Nov 20, 2009 4:05pm
osudarby08's avatar

osudarby08

Senior Member

734 posts
Nov 20, 2009 4:52 PM
darbypitcher22 wrote: When you have Thom Brenneman and Charles White calling a BCS game, there's a problem
this.
Nov 20, 2009 4:52pm
E

Elliot Stabler

Banned

388 posts
Nov 20, 2009 5:34 PM
Vball10set wrote:
Elliot Stabler wrote: ^^^

Just like when Archie won his 2nd too
I guess this site needs trolls too...do you have stats supporting Archie not deserving this award,or are you just blowing hot air--again :@
jhay78 wrote:
Elliot Stabler wrote: ^^^

Just like when Archie won his 2nd too
Fail-Bring some numbers next time to back up that nonsense.

As long as you're inserting Archie into the conversation, he could've easily won it his sophomore year as well. Might as well give it to him this year too if people are considering Tebow.
1973
John Cappelletti 1,522 yds 17 TD's Also played Defensive back
Archie Griffin 1,577 yds 13 TD's

1975
Archie Griffin 1,357 yds 4TD's
Chuck Muncie 1,477 yds 12 TD's
Ricky Bell 1,875 yds 14 TD's

Bell or Muncie should have won in '75 over Archie. It's not even really close
Nov 20, 2009 5:34pm
Trueblue23's avatar

Trueblue23

BASEDgod

7,463 posts
Nov 20, 2009 5:46 PM
Elliot Stabler wrote:
Vball10set wrote:
Elliot Stabler wrote: ^^^

Just like when Archie won his 2nd too
I guess this site needs trolls too...do you have stats supporting Archie not deserving this award,or are you just blowing hot air--again :@
jhay78 wrote:
Elliot Stabler wrote: ^^^

Just like when Archie won his 2nd too
Fail-Bring some numbers next time to back up that nonsense.

As long as you're inserting Archie into the conversation, he could've easily won it his sophomore year as well. Might as well give it to him this year too if people are considering Tebow.
1973
John Cappelletti 1,522 yds 17 TD's Also played Defensive back
Archie Griffin 1,577 yds 13 TD's

1975
Archie Griffin 1,357 yds 4TD's
Chuck Muncie 1,477 yds 12 TD's
Ricky Bell 1,875 yds 14 TD's


Bell or Muncie should have won in '75 over Archie. It's not even really close
How did this happen? Team success?
Nov 20, 2009 5:46pm
D

devil1197

Senior Member

6,220 posts
Nov 20, 2009 6:03 PM
I believe OSU went to their FB a majority of the time close to the goal line which took away Archie's TD total. He still carried the team which was a reason he was selected.
Nov 20, 2009 6:03pm
N

Nate

Formerly Known As Keebler

3,949 posts
Nov 21, 2009 9:29 AM
Todd McShay knows as much about football as I do nuclear engineering.
Nov 21, 2009 9:29am
se-alum's avatar

se-alum

The Biggest Boss

13,948 posts
Nov 21, 2009 9:36 AM
I would love to see Spiller win it! He's a hell of a football player!!
Nov 21, 2009 9:36am
G

George Costanza

Senior Member

120 posts
Nov 21, 2009 2:58 PM
Lets be honest guys, Archie really didnt deserve the 2nd Heisman.
Nov 21, 2009 2:58pm
G

George Costanza

Senior Member

120 posts
Nov 21, 2009 3:01 PM
Tebow had 317 total yards and 3 total TD's today in just over a half of action

Ingram had 107 rushing yards and 2 TD's in a half of action today.

Gerhart can really make an impact tonight on a national level with another monster game against CAL
Nov 21, 2009 3:01pm
BuckeyeBlue's avatar

BuckeyeBlue

Senior Member

561 posts
Nov 21, 2009 3:12 PM
I would say the top 3 right now are probably Ingram, McCoy, and Spiller. All 3 have had very good seasons. Tebow definitely hasn't lived up to his last 2 seasons.
Nov 21, 2009 3:12pm
I

ironman02

Senior Member

4,989 posts
Nov 22, 2009 12:18 AM
Gerhart had 20 rushes for 136 yards and 4TDs in a loss to Cal. Despite the loss, he made a huge statement in my opinion.

Colt McCoy made a big move also...32-41 for 396 yards and 4 TDs.
Nov 22, 2009 12:18am
E

Elliot Stabler

Banned

388 posts
Nov 22, 2009 12:20 AM
ccrunner609 wrote: Dont stain this thread with Tebow stats today.......he played a JV team.
Atleast they were 1-A. Bama played a 1-AA

After Today:

1.Tim Tebow
2.Colt McCoy
3.Mark Ingrahm
4.Toby Gerhart
5.Kellen Moore
Nov 22, 2009 12:20am
D

devil1197

Senior Member

6,220 posts
Nov 22, 2009 12:22 AM
McCoy jumped into the lead today with his huge performance. 400+ total yards, 78% completion. Against a somewhat decent team unlike Florida and Bama.
Nov 22, 2009 12:22am
jordo212000's avatar

jordo212000

Senior Member

10,664 posts
Nov 22, 2009 12:38 AM
Everybody has played bad teams at one point or another in the season. Why is what Florida and Alabama did today discounted, but Texas playing Wyoming gets a pass now?

Why is today any different?
Nov 22, 2009 12:38am
D

devil1197

Senior Member

6,220 posts
Nov 22, 2009 12:44 AM
jordo212000 wrote: Everybody has played bad teams at one point or another in the season. Why is what Florida and Alabama did today discounted, but Texas playing Wyoming gets a pass now?

Why is today any different?
Because its getting later into the year imo and the later performances stay with the voters more I would think. If the voting ended today, I'd rather be playing a BCS conference opponent.

Its basically setting up for a player to make the huge move come Conf. Championship time. McCoy, Tebow, Ingram, and Spiller will all be playing late in the season against good competition.
Nov 22, 2009 12:44am
jordo212000's avatar

jordo212000

Senior Member

10,664 posts
Nov 22, 2009 12:47 AM
devil1197 wrote:
Because its getting later into the year imo and the later performances stay with the voters more I would think. If the voting ended today, I'd rather be playing a BCS conference opponent.

Its basically setting up for a player to make the huge move come Conf. Championship time. McCoy, Tebow, Ingram, and Spiller will all be playing late in the season against good competition.
I really don't see any difference. Not everybody has the same schedule and bye weeks. There's a chance that this was one of their few weeks for an out of conference team and everybody else is in conference, thus voila you end up playing a sacrificial lamb.
Nov 22, 2009 12:47am
G

George Costanza

Senior Member

120 posts
Nov 22, 2009 1:42 PM
Tebow, Gerhart and McCoy had the best games yesterday of the contenders at this point.
Nov 22, 2009 1:42pm
D

devil1197

Senior Member

6,220 posts
Nov 22, 2009 1:44 PM
jordo212000 wrote:
devil1197 wrote:
Because its getting later into the year imo and the later performances stay with the voters more I would think. If the voting ended today, I'd rather be playing a BCS conference opponent.

Its basically setting up for a player to make the huge move come Conf. Championship time. McCoy, Tebow, Ingram, and Spiller will all be playing late in the season against good competition.
I really don't see any difference. Not everybody has the same schedule and bye weeks. There's a chance that this was one of their few weeks for an out of conference team and everybody else is in conference, thus voila you end up playing a sacrificial lamb.
There isn't any difference scheduling wise correct, but the voters will look at a later performance against a BCS school more closely than a performance against a crappy FIU team.
Nov 22, 2009 1:44pm
T

trep14

Senior Member

842 posts
Nov 22, 2009 1:49 PM
jordo212000 wrote:
devil1197 wrote:
Because its getting later into the year imo and the later performances stay with the voters more I would think. If the voting ended today, I'd rather be playing a BCS conference opponent.

Its basically setting up for a player to make the huge move come Conf. Championship time. McCoy, Tebow, Ingram, and Spiller will all be playing late in the season against good competition.
I really don't see any difference. Not everybody has the same schedule and bye weeks. There's a chance that this was one of their few weeks for an out of conference team and everybody else is in conference, thus voila you end up playing a sacrificial lamb.
I think it is pretty clear that people on here just really don't like the SEC and will grasp at any straws to discredit them.
Nov 22, 2009 1:49pm
D

devil1197

Senior Member

6,220 posts
Nov 22, 2009 3:05 PM
trep14 wrote:
jordo212000 wrote:
devil1197 wrote:
Because its getting later into the year imo and the later performances stay with the voters more I would think. If the voting ended today, I'd rather be playing a BCS conference opponent.

Its basically setting up for a player to make the huge move come Conf. Championship time. McCoy, Tebow, Ingram, and Spiller will all be playing late in the season against good competition.
I really don't see any difference. Not everybody has the same schedule and bye weeks. There's a chance that this was one of their few weeks for an out of conference team and everybody else is in conference, thus voila you end up playing a sacrificial lamb.
I think it is pretty clear that people on here just really don't like the SEC and will grasp at any straws to discredit them.
I actually like the SEC, Bama is my 2nd favorite team.

But wouldn't you, as a Heisman candidate, want to play better competition later in the year? Its only logical that voters remember the latest games in the year? Every team plays cupcakes but I'd much rather get them out of the way but I know with the SEC schedule its hard to do.

This is nothing against any conference, I'd say the same thing if Spiller and Clemson were playing Middle TN this past week instead of Week 1.
Nov 22, 2009 3:05pm
I

ironman02

Senior Member

4,989 posts
Nov 26, 2009 11:44 PM
Colt McCoy vs. Texas A&M

24-40 for 304 yards and 4 TDs
18 carries for 175 yards and a TD

Gotta be the front runner for the Heisman right now.
Nov 26, 2009 11:44pm
ohiotiger33's avatar

ohiotiger33

Senior Member

1,500 posts
Nov 26, 2009 11:52 PM
Wow what a game by McCoy. He may have wrapped it up. i still would like Spiller to play hard and get an invite to New York.
Nov 26, 2009 11:52pm
I

ironman02

Senior Member

4,989 posts
Nov 27, 2009 11:05 PM
Mark Ingram vs. Auburn

16 carries for 30 yards
3 catches for 21 yards

Ingram's Heisman chances took a MAJOR hit today.
Nov 27, 2009 11:05pm
D

devil1197

Senior Member

6,220 posts
Nov 27, 2009 11:08 PM
Its Colt's to lose.
Nov 27, 2009 11:08pm