BCSbunk wrote:
Yes I think so. So margin of victory is used in some cases to settle ties since it is home and home.
For example IF Ireland would have won at home 3-0 and France wins at home 2-0 Ireland would have the advantage?
Is that correct?
Yes, but I think you're still confused.
First way to decide the "Tie" is to go aggregate (or total) score. Simply add the number of goals each team scored in the two games combined. Team with most advances.
In the case both teams score the same amount (in the France/Ireland case, it was 1-1 after both matches) than you go to away goals. This means that you take how many goals each team scored on the road. Team with the most advances. Say Ireland had won 2-1 at home, and France won 1-0 at home. France would advance because they win the away goals scenario 1-0. However, in this case both teams won 1-0 on the road so the away goals were then tied 1-1. This means they play extra time.
In extra time in a home and home format the goals scored in extra time DO NOT COUNT towards the away goal rules. So if Ireland had scored to tie France after they scored the goal in overtime in theory the aggregate at the end would be 2-2 and Ireland would win 2-1 on away goals. BUT this is not the case. Extra time is simply extra time with no away goals mattering. So if Ireland had scored to tie the match it would have been 2-2 aggregate and penalty shots would have ensued to see who won.
As it stood, Ireland did not score and France was then ahead in the aggregate 2-1 and advanced.
For those confused as to why the game went to extra time when Ireland was winning 1-0 after the 90 minutes it is because France won 1-0 in the first game. I basically said that in the first part, but just reiterating it to make it clear.
NOW, I hope you get it. It will help you if you watch the Champions League knockout rounds. Teams often play to not concede an away goal in the first match. They REALLY play matches with both games in mind.