BR1986FB wrote:
Al Capone wrote:
According to ESPN:
1. Ravens- A
2. Steelers- B
3. Bungals- C
4. Clowns- c
That's comical. Bengals AND Browns draft were better than the Steelers. I'd give the Steelers a C-.
According to ProFootballWeekly.com, whose grades are posted on Yahoo! Sports, the only differences between their grades and ESPN's is that the Browns were upgraded to a C+ and Pittsburgh was downgraded to a B-.
Ignore the "(notes)" scattered through these things -- in the column, they're icons you can click on to get notes or something on players.
Baltimore Ravens
Ravens GM Ozzie Newsome has a reputation for taking a chance on talent with durability concerns early in the draft that others tend to pass by, and he did it again this year with the selection of Sergio Kindle(notes), who had a number of red flags. However, if Kindle stays healthy, he could be the draft’s biggest steal midway through the second round, and is perfectly suited for the Ravens’ defense. The selections of Terrence Cody(notes) and Ed Dickson(notes) also involved some risk, with Cody’s work habits in question and Dickson requiring time to absorb a playbook, but Newsome has a strong coaching staff to handle them. Dennis Pitta(notes) was another steal in the fourth round, and David Reed(notes), Arthur Jones(notes) and Ramon Harewood(notes) all potentially could earn roster spots. Despite trading out of the first round, the Ravens could land three starters from this draft. They continually recognized value, but it was offset by the risk involved. When factoring in the acquisition of Anquan Boldin(notes), the Ravens, as they have often done, had a strong showing, with four starters likely acquired.
Grade: A
Cincinnati Bengals
The Bengals were one of the few teams that stood pat and did not make a single trade. In typical Mike Brown fashion, there were some risky selections, most noticeably enigmatic DE Carlos Dunlap(notes) in the second round and Kansas State WR Dezmon Briscoe(notes) in the sixth, although the risk was much more minimal late. Jermaine Gresham(notes) was a very sound selection in the first round, with Pro Bowl-type potential. Jordan Shipley(notes) can factor into the slot but has been injury-prone. Brandon Ghee(notes) has first-round athletic talent, but free-agent level confidence and instincts, which could delay his development. Geno Atkins(notes) could help immediately as an inside nickel rusher. Roddrick Muckelroy(notes) could help on special teams. Otis Hudson(notes) and Reggie Stephens(notes) could both add depth to the O-line. Six draftees could easily make the roster, and collectively, the Bengals’ loaded up with great physical talent, but they may have overlooked some critical qualities that could lead to higher bust potential for Dunlap and Ghee. Overall, the Bengals’ draft was cleaner than usual, landing a potential Pro Bowl tight end in the first round, but it’s difficult to confidently project that they will come away with more than two starters.
Grade: C
Cleveland Browns
It’s difficult to say who deserves more criticism in the first year of the Mike Holmgren and Tom Heckert regime: the team’s medical staff or the personnel department. Throwing aside strong medical reservations that other teams had about T.J. Ward(notes), Montario Hardesty(notes), Colt McCoy(notes) and Larry Asante(notes), the Browns’ draft would appear favorable, as they continually landed solid talent throughout the draft and rebuilt a suspect secondary. What also must be factored is the dealing of former first-rounders Braylon Edwards(notes), Kamerion Wimbley(notes) and Brady Quinn(notes) (not to mention last year’s deal for Kellen Winslow(notes) that involved compensation this year) and in addition to Alex Hall(notes) and Corey Williams(notes). Acquired were Jason Trusnik(notes), Chansi Stuckey(notes), Seneca Wallace(notes), Chris Gocong(notes), Sheldon Brown(notes) and additional picks. The Browns may have accomplished their goal of improving team leadership by trading out a bevy of first-rounders, but there was a net loss in talent. Still, they may have landed three starters in the draft with the selections of Joe Haden(notes), Ward and Hardesty. Plus, Shawn Lauvao(notes), McCoy, Asante, Carlton Mitchell(notes) and Clifton Geathers(notes) have developmental potential. Overall, the Browns have been as active as anyone in the league re-sculpting their roster and building a “team.” All eight picks could make the roster, but it appears much more brittle following this draft.
Grade: C-plus
Pittsburgh Steelers
The Steelers long have been a need-driven drafting team under the direction of Kevin Colbert, and they focused on a great need with their first pick, selecting one of the best centers (Maurkice Pouncey(notes)) to exit college football in a long time. Despite seeming to be drafted highly for a center, he was a very safe selection. Jason Worilds(notes) and Thaddeus Gibson(notes) are both raw, developmental rush LB projects with speed to be groomed. Emmanuel Sanders(notes) could compete for a job in the slot. Crezdon Butler(notes) has press cover ability. The final two rounds addressed some niche roles, as Stevenson Sylvester(notes) could provide help on special-teams coverage, Jonathan Dwyer(notes) could help as a short-yardage runner, Antonio Brown could factor into the return game and Doug Worthington(notes) could develop as a five-technique. Losing a first-round talent in Santonio Holmes for only a fifth-rounder weakens the class, even if the deal needed to be done for bigger reasons. The Steelers did very well addressing needs, and could come away with three starters if one of their project linebacker hits, but losing Holmes for such a low price lessens the impact.
Grade: B-minus