devil1197 wrote:First off, the evidence coming out now is just being released. It had been collected awhile ago but during the investigation that evidence is kept private. So these are new allegations or comments, just released information.

Also, there are many cases of wrongdoing that are not pursued. Some factors are lack of physical evidence. Its hard to prove guilt when its a he/she said type of case, doesn't mean that the events didn't take place though. Also, some victims do not want to go through the situation all over again during the trial especially when dealing with a high profile defendant.

Gblock wrote:

rock_knutne wrote:

BR1986FB wrote: One thing I will say, old Florio sure is using Roethlisberger as a pinata. Every other story on his site is about Ben.

Florio is a hack and his deceptive style is why people hit his site.

I'll remind all of you one more time, all these statements you keep reading from the police report are not seen as actual facts.

ewok, I'm with you on the alleged victim........one would think she would be screaming and struggling to a get away from him if she was raped. None of that is evident.

Also, I find it amazing that this girl can remember all these details the day after, she was totally blasted that night.......anyone see her handwriting on the written statements she provided? Check out this link, pages 1 and 2 are from the next day, pages 3 and 4 are from the night of the alleged incident, you tell me if there isn't a big difference:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2010/0415101roethlisberger1.html#theLink

wow she mustve been hammered that handwriting is jacked up compared to the next day.

rock_knutne wrote:

devil1197 wrote:First off, the evidence coming out now is just being released. It had been collected awhile ago but during the investigation that evidence is kept private. So these are new allegations or comments, just released information.

Also, there are many cases of wrongdoing that are not pursued. Some factors are lack of physical evidence. Its hard to prove guilt when its a he/she said type of case, doesn't mean that the events didn't take place though. Also, some victims do not want to go through the situation all over again during the trial especially when dealing with a high profile defendant.

No they're not. There's no new allegations or comments, the cops and GBI had this info the entire time, you even mention that in your post.:huh:

rock_knutne wrote:

devil1197 wrote:First off, the evidence coming out now is just being released. It had been collected awhile ago but during the investigation that evidence is kept private. So these are new allegations or comments, just released information.

Also, there are many cases of wrongdoing that are not pursued. Some factors are lack of physical evidence. Its hard to prove guilt when its a he/she said type of case, doesn't mean that the events didn't take place though. Also, some victims do not want to go through the situation all over again during the trial especially when dealing with a high profile defendant.

No they're not. There's no new allegations or comments, the cops and GBI had this info the entire time, you even mention that in your post.:huh:

SportsAndLady wrote:

rock_knutne wrote:

devil1197 wrote:First off, the evidence coming out now is just being released. It had been collected awhile ago but during the investigation that evidence is kept private. So these are new allegations or comments, just released information.

Also, there are many cases of wrongdoing that are not pursued. Some factors are lack of physical evidence. Its hard to prove guilt when its a he/she said type of case, doesn't mean that the events didn't take place though. Also, some victims do not want to go through the situation all over again during the trial especially when dealing with a high profile defendant.

No they're not. There's no new allegations or comments, the cops and GBI had this info the entire time, you even mention that in your post.:huh:

You couldn't comprehend that he just forgot to put "not" in there?

Non wrote: This was already investigated and it was determined there wasn't enough physical evidence to prove rape beyond a reasonable doubt.

It's not even he said/she said, it's just she said and she was plastered.

devil1197 wrote:

Non wrote: This was already investigated and it was determined there wasn't enough physical evidence to prove rape beyond a reasonable doubt.

It's not even he said/she said, it's just she said and she was plastered.

That's BS.

It is a classic case of he/she said.

Of course it wouldn't be he/she said case if there was ample amount of PE. Thats the main reason why these cases arise and are not sent to a jury/bench trial.

Automatik wrote: It's still mind boggling to me. I just don't understand how you can just decide not to pursue the case anymore.

rock_knutne wrote:

SportsAndLady wrote:

rock_knutne wrote:

devil1197 wrote:First off, the evidence coming out now is just being released. It had been collected awhile ago but during the investigation that evidence is kept private. So these are new allegations or comments, just released information.

Also, there are many cases of wrongdoing that are not pursued. Some factors are lack of physical evidence. Its hard to prove guilt when its a he/she said type of case, doesn't mean that the events didn't take place though. Also, some victims do not want to go through the situation all over again during the trial especially when dealing with a high profile defendant.

No they're not. There's no new allegations or comments, the cops and GBI had this info the entire time, you even mention that in your post.:huh:

You couldn't comprehend that he just forgot to put "not" in there?

Could you?:rolleyes: I understand he made a typo and said so but that's a very key word to leave out, don't you think? I know, I know, you can read minds.

SportsAndLady wrote:

rock_knutne wrote:

SportsAndLady wrote:

rock_knutne wrote:

devil1197 wrote:First off, the evidence coming out now is just being released. It had been collected awhile ago but during the investigation that evidence is kept private. So these are new allegations or comments, just released information.

Also, there are many cases of wrongdoing that are not pursued. Some factors are lack of physical evidence. Its hard to prove guilt when its a he/she said type of case, doesn't mean that the events didn't take place though. Also, some victims do not want to go through the situation all over again during the trial especially when dealing with a high profile defendant.

No they're not. There's no new allegations or comments, the cops and GBI had this info the entire time, you even mention that in your post.:huh:

You couldn't comprehend that he just forgot to put "not" in there?

Could you?:rolleyes: I understand he made a typo and said so but that's a very key word to leave out, don't you think? I know, I know, you can read minds.

It's called reading his long ass post and putting two and two together that obviously he meant not.

devil1197 wrote:

Automatik wrote: It's still mind boggling to me. I just don't understand how you can just decide not to pursue the case anymore.

Its actually not that uncommon in sexually oriented cases.

Some victims would rather forget and move on.

rock_knutne wrote:

SportsAndLady wrote:

rock_knutne wrote:

devil1197 wrote:First off, the evidence coming out now is just being released. It had been collected awhile ago but during the investigation that evidence is kept private. So these are new allegations or comments, just released information.

Also, there are many cases of wrongdoing that are not pursued. Some factors are lack of physical evidence. Its hard to prove guilt when its a he/she said type of case, doesn't mean that the events didn't take place though. Also, some victims do not want to go through the situation all over again during the trial especially when dealing with a high profile defendant.

No they're not. There's no new allegations or comments, the cops and GBI had this info the entire time, you even mention that in your post.:huh:

You couldn't comprehend that he just forgot to put "not" in there?

Could you?:rolleyes: I understand he made a typo and said so but that's a very key word to leave out, don't you think? I know, I know, you can read minds.

Strapping Young Lad wrote: You're a fucking idiot. It's obvious from the rest of that post that he simply forgit to write not, but you in all your supposed intelligence had to point it out and act like you were telling us something profound....haha

Its funny to see some people blame the girl for getting so drunk that she could be taken advantage of. Guess what, a girl should be able to blackout buttass naked in the middle of mens rr and not have anyone touch her. what kind of fucking pig lays hands on a girl near the point of blacking out!???!?! If that's the only way you can get ass then kill yourself...

If you think Roethlisrapist didn't violate this girl in some way you are in denial.....

Al Capone wrote: What kind of pig lays hands on a girl near the point of blacking out!???

Strapping Young Lad wrote:

Al Capone wrote: What kind of pig lays hands on a girl near the point of blacking out!???

There, they're actually trying to make you look like a decent person over here. More than you can say for familywatchdog. Over there they are making you look like a real creep.