However you wish to label Mr. Trump, and there are many ways you could do so, he is preferable to me than Mrs. Clinton.ptown_trojans_1;1798103 wrote:Ok, I figured.
So a racist in the white house, which is what Paul Ryan called him, is better than a Clinton.
Got you all.
Agreed. Each individual voter has the ability to use whatever criteria the choose to determine how they will cast their vote.ptown_trojans_1;1798108 wrote:...
But, if some on here say he is better than Clinton, then so be it.
I KNOW!!! And on a site where most everyone else does nothing but conservative regurgitation!! THE HORROR!!!!iclfan2;1798101 wrote:X 1000. Ptown used to have decent thoughts on here, but for a long time it has just been liberal regurgitation. Anyone supporting Hillary on her merits has to be mental.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So you are just trusting him?SportsAndLady;1798111 wrote:Do you not understand that politicians say shit during elections to get elected? Do you actually think he's going to start a trade war with China? Or a war with Russia?
I mean, yes he'd be the president. But he doesn't have free reign to do whatever the fuck he wants.
gosh a ruddies nice to hear from a supporter of Donald Dukefish82;1798071 wrote:#isaderp :laugh:
I can't stand Trump at all I think Trump is an arrogant asshole, but please feel free to give me an exact quote from Trump (not some liberal media site regurgitation) that makes him racist.ptown_trojans_1;1798103 wrote:Ok, I figured.
So a racist in the white house, which is what Paul Ryan called him, is better than a Clinton.
Got you all.
Someone needs to tell this to Obama as well.SportsAndLady;1798111 wrote:
I mean, yes he'd be the president. But he doesn't have free reign to do whatever the fuck he wants.
There's no way you can use "trusting a candidate" and still support Hillary all in the same belief system. Unless you are so far in the tank for the left that you can't see your own hypocrisy.ptown_trojans_1;1798119 wrote:So you are just trusting him?
What on earth makes you think he won't do that?
Everything you read about the internal fighting inside his campaign and the way he makes decisions leads me to believe he will do whatever the hell he wants.
ptown_trojans_1;1798103 wrote:Ok, I figured.
So a racist in the white house, which is what Paul Ryan called him, is better than a Clinton.
Got you all.
ptown_trojans_1;1798119 wrote:So you are just trusting him?
I think the main guy playing the racist card is Trump with his "But, but, but he won't be fair to me because HE'S A MEXICAN!!!!!!" whining.QuakerOats;1798165 wrote:The law firm bringing the suit and the judge appear to be one-and-the-same; gee, how convenient. So the judge gets called out for a potential glaring bias, and all the liberal crybabies can do is play the racist card. To be expected.
isadore;1798024 wrote:gosh a ruddies, the Donald is doing his best to corral the racist vote.
isadore;1798035 wrote:gosh a ruddies while is efforts to win the white racist vote do wonders for him on this website, it does have its limitations in the rest of America.
ptown_trojans_1;1798103 wrote:Ok, I figured.
So a racist in the white house, which is what Paul Ryan called him, is better than a Clinton.
Got you all.
Anyone else find it ironic the majority of people who bring up race are liberals/democrats? In the libtard world, only republicans and conservatives are capable of being racist or prejudice. Anytime somebody says something that can be slightly construed as "racist" (98% a reach), liberals/dems blow a gasket playing the race card. It is intellectually lazy and pathetic. It's the biggest cop out/security blanket tactic we see day to day.isadore;1798167 wrote:lol gosh a ruddies, "racist card." Donald Duke makes an unbelievably racist statement and that is your defense. Birds of a feather.
gosh a ruddies, "slightly construed as 'racjst'" There is nothing slight about Donald Duke's statements about this Hoosier born Judge.like_that;1798179 wrote:Anyone else find it ironic the majority of people who bring up race are liberals/democrats? In the libtard world, only republicans and conservatives are capable of being racist or prejudice. Anytime somebody says something that can be slightly construed as "racist" (98% a reach), liberals/dems blow a gasket playing the race card. It is intellectually lazy and pathetic. It's the biggest cop out/security blanket tactic we see day to day.
It's also sad how a lot of people eat that shit up and vote based on it. Apparently the dems got another victim in ptown. I am sure ptown will come on here and let us know how much smarter he is than anyone else on this site and why he is right and everyone else is wrong though. All this while eating his own shit, since he is so full of himself.
Trump has the money to make sure people talk.QuakerOats;1798227 wrote:Pretty good speech by Trump last night. He also alluded to a much more pointed speech upcoming Monday that seemed to imply he would be focusing on her criminality. That ought to be fun.
The GOP nominated Donald Trump lol. Rest assured George W. Bush, John McCain and Mitt Romney will secretly vote for Hillary. You should too.HitsRus;1798218 wrote:
On the ludicrous scale, if he's 10.0, she's easily a 9.7, 9.8.BoatShoes;1798258 wrote:Lol Senator Mark Kirk disavows Trump. Paul Ryan and Senator Flake call him a racist and Hugh Hewitt says they ought to find a new candidate. Yet, the OC conservatives cannot accept that Hillary is a better candidate than him if even for the low bar that she is not completely ludicrous.
