BR1986FB;1419508 wrote:"We" meaning a bunch of internet "armchair GM's?" I didn't see as many knocks on him, by scouts/professionals, as were mentioned on here.
And as far as the best QB, I'd tend to agree with what the professionals, who actually analyze this stuff, think.
You mean the professionals, who do this for a LIVING, versus internet wannabes? I think I'll stick with the people getting paid (scouts) to do it. I get the impression you feel that you have the qualifications to be an NFL GM or scout?SportsAndLady;1419513 wrote:Yeah that's your problem you listen to people who are regularly wrong..if you would have just made your own evaluations last year you would have been pissed about Weeden too.
Smith never ran in college.BR1986FB;1419493 wrote:He has the same issues that everyone knocks Weeden for. He's a younger version of Weeden with mobility.
Mobility doesn't necessarily mean "he runs the ball."Automatik;1419516 wrote:Smith never ran in college.
I know. That means he STILL is more mobile than Weeden. Weeden is a statue.Automatik;1419516 wrote:Smith never ran in college.
Exactly. He's not a QB that you're going to draft for a read option type offense but he can move when he needs to.like_that;1419517 wrote:Mobility doesn't necessarily mean "he runs the ball."
Yeah, I thought you meant he was used in designed runs. He had a few gains last year on broken plays, maybe 200 yards all season.BR1986FB;1419518 wrote:I know. That means he STILL is more mobile than Weeden. Weeden is a statue.
I can't remember any recent QB ever having a bad pro day. They set those things up so even marginal QB's will look good. Not saying Smith is "marginal." I just don't want him.Automatik;1419522 wrote:Yeah, I thought you meant he was used in designed runs. He had a few gains last year on broken plays, maybe 200 yards all season.
I'm interested to see how he pans out. Everyone oooo'd and aaahh'd over his pro day. Just like they did for Sizzurp Russell.
My coworker said the Jets want him at 9 if he's there. For his sake I hope that doesn't happen. :laugh:
The same professionals that said Leaf was better than Peyton, that Jamarcus was a can't miss prospect, and that Russell Wilson wouldn't do anything because he isn't tall?BR1986FB;1419515 wrote:You mean the professionals, who do this for a LIVING, versus internet wannabes? I think I'll stick with the people getting paid (scouts) to do it. I get the impression you feel that you have the qualifications to be an NFL GM or scout?
Still waiting to see the OhioChatter scouting creditials....:rolleyes:DeyDurkie5;1419536 wrote:The same professionals that said Leaf was better than Peyton, that Jamarcus was a can't miss prospect, and that Russell Wilson wouldn't do anything because he isn't tall?
like_that;1419520 wrote:Also, I have definitely seen Geno run for some big gains.
BR1986FB;1419541 wrote:Still waiting to see the OhioChatter scouting creditials....:rolleyes:
^He madSportsAndLady;1419619 wrote:What does your thick skull not comprehend about how stupid you sound? Those "professionals" make plenty of mistakes ALL THE TIME. im not saying im a professional but I certainly could see Weeden was not going to be very good..and guess what, I was right. You and the "professionals" were wrong BR.
Don't blow out your shoulder patting yourself on the back when Weeden's grade as a QB is "incomplete." Let's see how he does will a REAL offensive coordinator who will unleash him and let him "let it rip" instead of neutering him with the dink & dunk underneath crap.SportsAndLady;1419619 wrote:What does your thick skull not comprehend about how stupid you sound? Those "professionals" make plenty of mistakes ALL THE TIME. im not saying im a professional but I certainly could see Weeden was not going to be very good..and guess what, I was right. You and the "professionals" were wrong BR.
:thumbup::thumbup:BR1986FB;1419626 wrote:New stuff from Adkins (OBR)...Browns will likely take a QB but expect it to be one of the Tyler's (Bray or Wilson) or Dysert.
Besides McCoy's cap hit part of the reason he was moved was because he wasn't seen as a "team player."
They like OG's (Warford-KY & Dallas Thomas-TN) but won't likely burn the pick on Warmack where they are currently positioned.
They love Tavon Austin & Keenan Allen but won't use #6 on one of them.
A name to watch at TE is Vance McDonald (Rice).
They really like Milliner but see 8 starting quality CB's in this draft.
They also like safeties Rambo (Georgia), Wilcox (Southern GA) & Swearinger (S. Carolina).
As has been mentioned, hope someone REALLY wants a LT and the Browns are in the sweet spot for a trade down.Pick6;1419633 wrote:So who the hell are they going to take at 6??
Adkins also said if they can recoup a 2nd, they are willing to trade down a "handful" of slots but no more.like_that;1419635 wrote:Cards are holding a private workout for barklay. 3 weeks out from the draft and my bold (and wishful) prediction is the browns trade down twice and are still picking in the top 15.
