Ohio Chatter
Ohio Chatter

Forums

All Threads Serious Business Sports Politics Archive Pick 'ems
Log In Create Account

Brady Quinn to Denver

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Pro Sports ▸ Brady Quinn to Denver
E

Eric Taylor

Senior Member

602 posts
Mar 15, 2010 8:58 AM
McCoy and Pike likely will be gone by the 3rd.

If they wait until the 3rd, Tebow or Snead are real possibilites.
Mar 15, 2010 8:58am
E

Eric Taylor

Senior Member

602 posts
Mar 15, 2010 9:00 AM
And nobody knows who for sure will be the starter, I would say it is a tossup right now.
Mar 15, 2010 9:00am
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Mar 15, 2010 9:15 AM
Wooball wrote: Lefevour, Snead, Pike, Tebow ??? Would McCoy drop this far? Is there anyone else that I am missing that could be a target in those rounds?

All of these QB's could be available at the top of the 3rd round. If there's one they REALLY like at the the mid/bottom of that round they can always use a pick to trade up.
Mar 15, 2010 9:15am
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Mar 15, 2010 9:17 AM
just_a_swimmer wrote: Espn draft guru's are now speculating the Browns will take a QB in this draft in round 1.
I dunno about that.
Only QB I'd consider in round 1 is Bradford. If Clausen fell to us I'd see if we could trade down.

If Bradford stays healthy I really think he's going to be something special. If he locks into the right system I could see him having a Peyton Manning-like career.
Mar 15, 2010 9:17am
E

Eric Taylor

Senior Member

602 posts
Mar 15, 2010 9:20 AM
It would be a shock right now if Bradford didnt go #1.

Cleveland already tried the Notre Dame QB thing and that didnt exactly work.
Mar 15, 2010 9:20am
M

miller45452003

Senior Member

673 posts
Mar 15, 2010 9:40 AM
^^^I couldn't agree more on the second part of your post. No more "golden boys" from ND. We could be wrong about Clausen, but I highly doubt it. If you take Golden Tate and the other big WR(forget his name) out of the equation, he doesn't put up the numbers he did. JMO>>
Mar 15, 2010 9:40am
thedynasty1998's avatar

thedynasty1998

Senior Member

6,844 posts
Mar 15, 2010 9:51 AM
Eric Taylor wrote: It would be a shock right now if Bradford didnt go #1.

Cleveland already tried the Notre Dame QB thing and that didnt exactly work.
That's not fair. Quinn dropped in the draft for a reason. No one was really high on him.

Clausen can make all the throws and is a different QB. It's like saying no one should touch an OSU defensive lineman because Gholsten isn't doing well.
Mar 15, 2010 9:51am
4cards's avatar

4cards

Ohio Chatter Legend

2,551 posts
Mar 15, 2010 10:07 AM
...If Tebow is around in the 3rd round ( I doubt he will be) but if he is, I'd take him and at least use him as a TE/back up QB.
Mar 15, 2010 10:07am
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Mar 15, 2010 10:10 AM
Gil Brandt who is probably the most (or at least top 5) respected in the NFL among the (former) scouting ranks has told Holmgren that Colt McCoy will "make people forget about Joe Montana." I think that comment is a MAJOR stretch but I could see the Browns targeting McCoy at some point.
Mar 15, 2010 10:10am
N

Nate

Formerly Known As Keebler

3,949 posts
Mar 15, 2010 10:12 AM
I'd rather have McCoy over Jimmy Boy.
Mar 15, 2010 10:12am
C

Crimson_Streak

Senior Member

172 posts
Mar 15, 2010 12:30 PM
i would rather have Clausen. he has a big arm (something quinn didnt have) and is a heck of a leader. clausen throws the best deep ball in the draft and can make every throw on the field. im just a little worried about bradfords shoulder and he ability to play under center
Mar 15, 2010 12:30pm
P

pkebker

Senior Member

760 posts
Mar 15, 2010 12:38 PM
What's the scouting report on Snead? He might be a bit underrated...
Mar 15, 2010 12:38pm
M

Mr Pat

Senior Member

519 posts
Mar 15, 2010 12:48 PM
miller45452003 wrote: ^^^I couldn't agree more on the second part of your post. No more "golden boys" from ND. We could be wrong about Clausen, but I highly doubt it. If you take Golden Tate and the other big WR(forget his name) out of the equation, he doesn't put up the numbers he did. JMO>>
You're right, because Notre Dame has never had a good QB... I do like the rock solid logic though, because Player A is from the same school as Player B, they must be the same type of player!
Mar 15, 2010 12:48pm
krazie45's avatar

krazie45

Senior Member

1,055 posts
Mar 15, 2010 12:50 PM
Clausen is much better than Quinn. He has a stronger arm and is more accurate and though Tate and co. are good receiver they aren't what Quinn had in Stovall and Samardjia.

Should the Browns draft Crompton because Peyton Manning went to Tennessee?
Mar 15, 2010 12:50pm
BCBulldog's avatar

BCBulldog

Senior Member

824 posts
Mar 15, 2010 1:52 PM
BR1986FB wrote: Gil Brandt who is probably the most (or at least top 5) respected in the NFL among the (former) scouting ranks has told Holmgren that Colt McCoy will "make people forget about Joe Montana." I think that comment is a MAJOR stretch but I could see the Browns targeting McCoy at some point.
I like the sounds of that. A little out there with the Joe Montana comparison, but I would really like to see McCoy there when the Browns draft in the 2nd round. If not, I'm not sure there is a QB worth targeting until the fouth round at best.
Mar 15, 2010 1:52pm
KnightRyder's avatar

KnightRyder

Senior Member

1,428 posts
Mar 15, 2010 3:05 PM
krazie45 wrote: Clausen is much better than Quinn. He has a stronger arm and is more accurate and though Tate and co. are good receiver they aren't what Quinn had in Stovall and Samardjia.

Should the Browns draft Crompton because Peyton Manning went to Tennessee?
imo quinn was better than clausen. but one thing is for certain , some people cant get enough of those golden domer busts.
Mar 15, 2010 3:05pm
just_a_swimmer's avatar

just_a_swimmer

Senior Member

674 posts
Mar 15, 2010 3:25 PM
I wish Quinn luck. He deserves a shot somewhere. I wish things would have worked out but it is obvious he needed a change of scenery as did the Browns. Quinn will probably turn out to be the second coming because that is just our luck.
Mar 15, 2010 3:25pm
krazie45's avatar

krazie45

Senior Member

1,055 posts
Mar 15, 2010 6:07 PM
KnightRyder wrote:
krazie45 wrote: Clausen is much better than Quinn. He has a stronger arm and is more accurate and though Tate and co. are good receiver they aren't what Quinn had in Stovall and Samardjia.

Should the Browns draft Crompton because Peyton Manning went to Tennessee?
imo quinn was better than clausen. but one thing is for certain , some people cant get enough of those golden domer busts.
Not sure how you came to that conclusion with actually watching the two play. Like I said, Clausen has a better arm and is more accurate but I guess Quinn had more team success.
Mar 15, 2010 6:07pm
Pick6's avatar

Pick6

A USA American

14,946 posts
Mar 15, 2010 6:53 PM
blah blah blah..what qb that was a loser in college has ever done anything in the nfl?
Mar 15, 2010 6:53pm
krazie45's avatar

krazie45

Senior Member

1,055 posts
Mar 15, 2010 10:15 PM
Pick6 wrote: blah blah blah..what qb that was a loser in college has ever done anything in the nfl?
John Elway never played in a bowl game...

OWNED
Mar 15, 2010 10:15pm
Lovejoy1984's avatar

Lovejoy1984

Senior Member

5,277 posts
Mar 15, 2010 10:39 PM
krazie45 wrote:
Pick6 wrote: blah blah blah..what qb that was a loser in college has ever done anything in the nfl?
John Elway never played in a bowl game...

OWNED
Correct, Elway was a sub .500 QB.
Mar 15, 2010 10:39pm
Pick6's avatar

Pick6

A USA American

14,946 posts
Mar 15, 2010 11:01 PM
There is always an exception.
Mar 15, 2010 11:01pm
Writerbuckeye's avatar

Writerbuckeye

Senior Member

4,745 posts
Mar 15, 2010 11:28 PM
Pick6 wrote: There is always an exception.
He answered your question -- it doesn't matter if it's an exception or not. YOU made it sound like there weren't any good ones and he proved you wrong.
Mar 15, 2010 11:28pm
M

Mr Pat

Senior Member

519 posts
Mar 15, 2010 11:29 PM
Pick6 wrote: There is always an exception.
Enter Clausen! :)
Mar 15, 2010 11:29pm
Mulva's avatar

Mulva

Senior Member

13,650 posts
Mar 15, 2010 11:38 PM
pkebker wrote: What's the scouting report on Snead? He might be a bit underrated...
Snead is garbage^2.
Mar 15, 2010 11:38pm