A better overall season??? Can't argue the 3 days of the conference tourney but no way in hell they had a better overall season as Syracuse won the regular season conference championship AND beat WVU AT Morgantown. Other than having a better 3 day stretch in the conference tourney.....Syracuse clearly had a better overall season than WVU-conference tourney included or not.slingshot4ever wrote:They have been fickle before. Wouldn't be a surprise to me. Don't forget, they take into account injuries and rate the teasm based on what they will be able to put on the floor. With the injury incurred for Syracuse it will affect their seeding just like it will for Purdue.killer_ewok wrote:I just think it's hilarious that you think the committee is THAT fickle.slingshot4ever wrote: I think either Duke or Ohio State gets the nod over Cuse, unless both Duke and OSU lose tomorrow. I do not think the committee gives it to a team that lost their last 2 games and couldn't get out of the quarterfinals in the conference tourney.
Given that same reasoning, it is common knowledge that they will look at OSU w/ Turner in terms of the regular season because that is the lineup they will have in the tourney. The 6 games played without him don't represent the team that will be tourney; and therefore, much stake won't be put into the 3 losses when he was absent from the lineup.
I also think WV had a better overall season including the conf tourney than Cuse. They deserve a 1 seed over Cuse.
And Onuaku is expected to be back at practice tomorrow so why in the hell will they penalize Syracuse for an insignificant injury? He might not be 100%, but he's not gonna shrink so his mere presence will continue to be an asset for Syracuse and a potential problem for opponents. They're going to get a #1 seed. I have faith in the committee. They have stated their guidelines before and if they stand by that the Orange are a #1.