Pretty sure this falls under domestic terrorism.Laley23 wrote: lol, what a psycho!
Glad it wasnt terrorist related..... :S
He sure as hell didn't like the way the United States operates.
Pretty sure this falls under domestic terrorism.Laley23 wrote: lol, what a psycho!
Glad it wasnt terrorist related..... :S
I know, thus my "confused smiley" relating to the early reports that it wasnt terrorism related.devil1197 wrote:Pretty sure this falls under domestic terrorism.Laley23 wrote: lol, what a psycho!
Glad it wasnt terrorist related..... :S
He sure as hell didn't like the way the United States operates.
I guess it depends on your definition. When a disgruntled ex-employee "goes postal" and shoots a bunch of people, is it terrorism? Not IMO. This is only different in the choice of weapon.Upper90 wrote: Well, would this not be an act of terror?
And yeah, reading that manifesto was a bit intense.
I don't think this guys situation is anything like a disgruntled ex employee.queencitybuckeye wrote:I guess it depends on your definition. When a disgruntled ex-employee "goes postal" and shoots a bunch of people, is it terrorism? Not IMO. This is only different in the choice of weapon.Upper90 wrote: Well, would this not be an act of terror?
And yeah, reading that manifesto was a bit intense.
Cory Lidle=terrorist?ccrunner609 wrote: plane crash into building = terrorist.
I think we'll find out in due course that his issue stemed from getting caught cheating on his taxes. He comes across to me as one of those tax protester wackos.devil1197 wrote: This guy definitely had some major issues with the United States government and this was he way with dealing with it.
queencitybuckeye wrote: I think we'll find out in due course that his issue stemed from getting caught cheating on his taxes. He comes across to me as one of those tax protester wackos.
I was having the same thought. Do you expect the government to come out and admit that they screwed this guy over and drove him to do what he did?Strapping Young Lad wrote: We know the government would never do anyone wrong, so that's a safe assumption....
Do you have any reason to believe the government screwed this fruit loop, other than wanting to believe it?Strapping Young Lad wrote: We know the government would never do anyone wrong, so that's a safe assumption....
What happens more often - someone cheats on their taxes and gets caught, or someone gets blatently screwed by the IRS (note: this is rhetorical unless one is a member of the tinfoil brigade)?Strapping Young Lad wrote: Yes. Organizations, especially the Federal Government, have been screwing people for years. If you don't think so, you're very lucky.
I'm talking about people choosing the believe the less likely over the more likely tending to be the black helicopter types.Strapping Young Lad wrote: What the hell are you talking about????
and so have non government organizations.Strapping Young Lad wrote: Yes. Organizations, especially the Federal Government, have been screwing people for years. If you don't think so, you're very lucky.
It wouldn't suprise me if this guy cheated on his taxes. But it sure as hell would not suprise if The Man fucked this guy around one too many times.queencitybuckeye wrote: Black helicopter types are those who see conspiracies, government conspiracies in particular around every corner.
It is possible that the IRS screwed this guy? Yes.
Is it FAR more likely that he's a wacko and a cheat? Yes.