Yes, and nationally Duke is the number seven team, which makes Maryland, whom you recognize as a non-top 30 team, losing to Duke by 20 not so surprising. It would only be a "laughable" comparison had Duke lost at Maryland by 20 and I tried to explain what happened. There was no comparison trying to be made. I was proving how flawed the logic you were using was. Duke is the best team in the ACC by a long shot, and should take care of Maryland.slingshot4ever wrote:Georgetown is a top 10 team, Maryland isn't even a top 30 team in the nation. Comparing Maryland to Georgetown is laughable considering the fact that Georgetown laid the wood to Duke, nice try though.
And quit with the one bad loss to someone means a team is weak theory. This means about as much as me answering 'motorcycle' to you asking me what time Nova Scotia races China in team luge. Which is to say little. WV's beatdown loss at Purdue on Jan. 1, like Duke's three point loss at Wisconsin in Nov., means nothing.
This is my favorite, though, so I'll post it again.
"Maryland is a top 4 team in the ACC and lost to Duke by over 20. That shows how weak the ACC is."
Pitt is tied for fourth in the Big East and lost to WV by 19. That shows how weak the Big East is.