Hail Trump! NoSpock;1830211 wrote:http://www.dcfpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/DC-Poverty-Demographics.pdf
Derp....isaderp is going to eat his foot
https://talkpoverty.org/state-year-report/arkansas-2016-report/
Hail Trump! NoSpock;1830211 wrote:http://www.dcfpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/DC-Poverty-Demographics.pdf
Derp....isaderp is going to eat his foot
Hail Trump! I got the feeling you need to see large parts of Arkansas, Alabama and Mississippilike_that;1830258 wrote:Yeah I have lived in DC for a little over 4 years now and I'm wondering what part of D.C. Isadore has seen.
And there's the hook. You think the Labor Secretary designate is going to come to Washington and enforce labor laws? Hell 60% of his franchisees have at least one time/wage violation in recent years. Enforcement is out the window with this bunch and those rules will be gone.Apple;1830260 wrote:And no where do you mention OSHA or other instances of local, state and federal laws that have been implemented to protect modern employees. You act like the only recourse an employee has is through union intervention. This may have been true in bygone generations, but today, it is a leftist false narrative scare tactic.
When begun, unions were useful, needed and indeed alleviated the worst conditions and gave employees self respect and dignity. Since that time, local, state and federal laws have been implemented that protect employees. Some employers may try to skirt the law, but if found, they are dealt with severely.
Unions today have outlived the majority of their usefulness and have become nothing less than a facade of their former selves. Unions have become nearly entirely corrupt to the point they survive not for the employee but for, 1. the fat-cat union bosses and 2. as a money pit for the alt-left. Unions are a major reason for the abysmal education system forced upon our children and the ever-increasing financial burden on government and government projects.
Right to work states allow employees the safety of not having to be a part of the corrupt unions to get a job and then also not be fired from a job if they are not a member of the corrupt unions.
Hail Trump! How unbelievably disingenuous. Why do you think those laws are on the books protecting workers? Because of the efforts of corporations you lying hypocrite. Those laws and on the books because of the efforts of union and there supporters that elected the people who were sympathetic to workers. And to the unions' lobbying efforts that pushed them through the various legislative bodies. What we have seen for years is an effort to undermine those protections by corporations, their paid shills and their unwitting dupes. They work hard to push things back to longer work days, for less pay and in more dangerous conditions. Right to work is a major part of that effort.Apple;1830260 wrote:And no where do you mention OSHA or other instances of local, state and federal laws that have been implemented to protect modern employees. You act like the only recourse an employee has is through union intervention. This may have been true in bygone generations, but today, it is a leftist false narrative scare tactic.
When begun, unions were useful, needed and indeed alleviated the worst conditions and gave employees self respect and dignity. Since that time, local, state and federal laws have been implemented that protect employees. Some employers may try to skirt the law, but if found, they are dealt with severely.
Unions today have outlived the majority of their usefulness and have become nothing less than a facade of their former selves. Unions have become nearly entirely corrupt to the point they survive not for the employee but for, 1. the fat-cat union bosses and 2. as a money pit for the alt-left. Unions are a major reason for the abysmal education system forced upon our children and the ever-increasing financial burden on government and government projects.
Right to work states allow employees the safety of not having to be a part of the corrupt unions to get a job and then also not be fired from a job if they are not a member of the corrupt unions.
Hail Trump!jmog;1830255 wrote:Proof you have never been to the 'backside' of DC nor Alabama or Mississippi.
Hail Trump. It is why they make more money than black people in Mississippi, Arkansas and AlabamaBelly35;1830228 wrote:Its not a state.... The Union boss tell you this but it's not true...
Washington, D.C., formally the District of Columbia and commonly referred to as "Washington", "the District", or simply "D.C.", is the capital of the United States. The signing of the Residence Act on July 16, 1790, approved the creation of a capital district located along the Potomac River on the country's East Coast. The U.S. Constitution provided for a federal district under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Congress and the District is therefore not a part of any state.
Blacks make up the highest percentage of Union membership. Hope this helps
Hail Trump. With stronger unions those laws are enforced and we have a different Labor Secretary.bigorangebuck22;1830288 wrote:And there's the hook. You think the Labor Secretary designate is going to come to Washington and enforce labor laws? Hell 60% of his franchisees have at least one time/wage violation in recent years. Enforcement is out the window with this bunch and those rules will be gone.
Hail Trump! End government support and protections.QuakerOats;1830263 wrote:Bingo. Then again it is all relative; where incomes are lower, the cost of living is also lower.
The problem we have today is that the imputed income of all government handouts is about on par with average household income, so there is no incentive to get a job and be productive. The liberal answer is not to fix that, but rather to go on nationwide rants to increase minimum wage to $15-$20 (which incidentally is just the impetus to then have all wages rise by ridiculous amounts) in order that work becomes equal to, or greater than, welfare in value.
This could be fixed in a matter a hours if we had elected officials that had the balls to do it.
Proof again that you have been to none of those 3 places.isadore;1830292 wrote:Hail Trump!
D. C. backside does not match Alabama or Mississippi
Hail Trump! I have been to all those placesjmog;1830302 wrote:Proof again that you have been to none of those 3 places.
In DC, the growing number of children who are killed in drive by shootings is on the rise, too. Must be union warfare, eh?isadore;1830292 wrote:Hail Trump!
D. C. backside does not match Alabama or Mississippi
Hail TrumpCenterBHSFan;1830307 wrote:In DC, the growing number of children who are killed in drive by shootings is on the rise, too. Must be union warfare, eh?
isadore;1830310 wrote:Hail Trump
And the babies are more likely to die in Mississippi and Alabama than they are in DC. So much for infants right to http://kff.org/other/state-indicator/infant-mortality-rate-by-race-ethnicity/?currentTimeframe=0breath.
Unions hold the highest number of black membership with black women making up that majority however Unions also have the least amount of women leadership. Parently Union's don't believe in women's equal rights they just want to take their money for duesisadore;1830310 wrote:Hail Trump
And the babies are more likely to die in Mississippi and Alabama than they are in DC. So much for infants right to http://kff.org/other/state-indicator/infant-mortality-rate-by-race-ethnicity/?currentTimeframe=0breath.
Hail Trump. Please send a translator. "the least amount of female leadership" as compared to who or what? "Parently"????Belly35;1830365 wrote:Unions hold the highest number of black membership with black women making up that majority however Unions also have the least amount of women leadership. Parently Union's don't believe in women's equal rights they just want to take their money for dues
Sent from my XT1565 using Tapatalk
Hail Trump. From the party who claims to love the fetus until its born. But then also tries to cuts programs to provide pre natal care for low income women.QuakerOats;1830357 wrote:Yours is the party of infanticide ..... funny you would suddenly care about babies.
So I am now a "lying hypocrite" when I agreed with you that unions "indeed alleviated the worse conditions and gave employees self resect and dignity".isadore;1830289 wrote:Hail Trump! How unbelievably disingenuous. Why do you think those laws are on the books protecting workers? Because of the efforts of corporations you lying hypocrite. Those laws and on the books because of the efforts of union and there supporters that elected the people who were sympathetic to workers. And to the unions' lobbying efforts that pushed them through the various legislative bodies. What we have seen for years is an effort to undermine those protections by corporations, their paid shills and their unwitting dupes. They work hard to push things back to longer work days, for less pay and in more dangerous conditions. Right to work is a major part of that effort.
Hail Trump. Unions did alleviate the worst working condition, give workers dignity and self respect that corporations and their government lackeys denied them. And now those same groups are trying to take away that dignity and self respect and institute those old conditions upon workers. And you and your ilk are doing your best to aid them in this effort by undermining unions, the most important single group in protecting workers.Apple;1830562 wrote:So I am now a "lying hypocrite" when I agreed with you that unions "indeed alleviated the worse conditions and gave employees self resect and dignity".
That is priceless!
Unfortunately, those elected officials sympathetic to employees, (and who worked with the unions), created such an astronomically corrupt system, (with each inside each other's pockets), that the employees are left with nothing but fat-cat union officials getting rich walking in goose-step with an alt-left political party.
To continue their support of the corrupt union-alt left cabal would mean that they, the employees, would be nothing more than unwitting dupes.
When there is no other place to go, it is no wonder that employees are choosing to abandon their once-needed union and leftist political leaders for a political party led by someone promising to help make them great again!
isadore;1830375 wrote:Hail Trump. From the party who claims to love the fetus until its born. But then also tries to cuts programs to provide pre natal care for low income women.
Well, this turned into a quick reminder that, no matter how annoying and stupid he is, Isadore will never be as completely loony as QQ.QuakerOats;1831336 wrote:Eric Holder hired by California to basically lead the state in defiance of the US Constitution and Trump's actions to uphold the Constitution and the rule of law. This should be fun. Maybe we can ultimately 'settle of court' so to speak, with the removal of the liberal areas of California from the United States. Perhaps this could go hand-in-hand with the plan to split California into 5 states, 3-4 being conservative, and the balance for the radical liberal nutcases.
Heretic;1831345 wrote:Well, this turned into a quick reminder that, no matter how annoying and stupid he is, Isadore will never be as completely loony as QQ.