BR1986FB;1845452 wrote:I already made myself clear about using Sanders to eat minutes after the Boston game, if the Cavs lose. At that point, they're likely no longer contending for the top seed.

like_that;1845453 wrote:It hurts to throw 10 minutes at him against the magic after the cavs went 6-10 in march and lost the firm grasp to the 1 seed they apparently dgaf about? Lol, k.

friendfromlowry;1845455 wrote:The difference between winning and losing is whether or not Larry Sanders plays ten minutes a game!!!

sleeper;1845460 wrote:Except Sanders is still not NBA ready so "eating minutes" is absolutely harmful to the team that is trying to regain the #1 seed in the East.

sleeper;1845465 wrote:It absolutely does. But again, it's not on ESPN so you won't understand it.

sleeper;1845466 wrote:It makes a substantial difference especially when you are playing against top competition.

Commander of Awesome;1845467 wrote:Sleeper's failed logic would have gotten in the way of the Cavs signing Derrick Williams as well. lolfail

like_that;1845489 wrote:ITT insecure sleeper doesn't comprehend the concept of low risk moves.

sleeper;1845801 wrote:By low risk move you mean jeopardizing a chance at the 1 seed just so TT, the NBA's ironman, can get 5-10 minutes a night rest?

SportsAndLady;1845470 wrote:How do you know he's not NBA ready? Are you watching his D-league games? Are you somehow seeing the tape of his practices?

like_that;1845802 wrote:This is coming from a guy who has always said the seed doesn't matter because every team in the east is trash and can't stop Lebron in the playoffs.

Now you're worried that larry playing 5-10 minutes is going to ruin a seed that you never cared about?

LOL, this is what happens when you go full on insecure butt hurt. You can't even get your sleeper logic straight.

sleeper;1845804 wrote:It really doesn't matter what seed they have but its much better for the team overall to have home court throughout the Eastern conference playoffs.

Sorry that you are butthurt over a project not getting minutes on an NBA championship contending team.

like_that;1845805 wrote:Uhh ya think? The point is you don't think it matters, yet you are so concerned about seeing what Larry can do. You're letting your act get in the way something that really isn't a huge deal. Contending NBA teams add guys to the roster late in the season all the time. They are all low risk moves and Lebron has benefitted from it a couple times in his career now.

Just admit your logic is failed and you can't keep up with your act. It must be exhausting being so insecure about your knowledge of sports on an anonymous forum.

sleeper;1845806 wrote:GM and coach agree with me.

Sorry, not going to continuously play into your "omg! your act though" fantasy.

like_that;1845807 wrote:Is that why the GM signed him? Is that why they continue to call him up to be around the team? Is that why lue threw him in the end of a game on the first day of his contract? Just stop dude, you invent the dumbest arguments. Nobody is fantasizing about Larry turning this team around.

sleeper;1845810 wrote:GM said he was signed for potential impact next year. There is zero expectation to trot him out for any meaningful minutes this season.

He's been regulated back to the D-league again. They have already stated that he will be practicing with the team and playing with the Charge until they think he's ready.

Sorry that the reality of the world goes against your personal fantasy.

like_that;1845813 wrote:What personal fantasy? I wanted Bogut over Larry. The NBA logic is on my side. Every year contending teams add low risk pieces and if it doesn't work it there is no harm. It has worked out for 2 of LeBron's titles. You can try to fabricate this into everyone here thinking that Larry is our savior (if you have proof please provide it), but that's your problem if you want to keep coming off as an insecure moron.

Ironman92;1845833 wrote:LeBron is really good at basketball.

Commander of Awesome;1845843 wrote:[video=youtube;rTYQOGUS5Ck][/video]