Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Mar 17, 2016 2:23pm
Adam Schefter ‏@AdamSchefter 5m5 minutes ago Competition Committee proposing that all chop blocks be made illegal.
Interesting, pretty much negates any smaller athletic Oline right? Good bye denver running games of the 90s, Texans running, etc..... if it happens.
Interesting, pretty much negates any smaller athletic Oline right? Good bye denver running games of the 90s, Texans running, etc..... if it happens.
Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Mar 17, 2016 2:37pm
Good bye running games completely.Commander of Awesome;1787488 wrote:Adam Schefter ‏@AdamSchefter 5m5 minutes ago Competition Committee proposing that all chop blocks be made illegal.
Interesting, pretty much negates any smaller athletic Oline right? Good bye denver running games of the 90s, Texans running, etc..... if it happens.
Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Mar 18, 2016 1:47pm
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Mar 22, 2016 9:47am
Alfred Morris is signing with Dallas. If he as anything left, he could be a really good addition to McFadden.
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Mar 22, 2016 11:41am
It's funny how people talk about Alfred Morris like he's old. He just turned 27 haha.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Mar 22, 2016 11:43am
Yeah, but he has declined every year in the league. Hopefully Dallas can be a breath of fresh air.Azubuike24;1788467 wrote:It's funny how people talk about Alfred Morris like he's old. He just turned 27 haha.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Mar 22, 2016 12:42pm
27 is old for a RB.Azubuike24;1788467 wrote:It's funny how people talk about Alfred Morris like he's old. He just turned 27 haha.
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Mar 22, 2016 12:43pm
Not one with only 1000 carries.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Mar 22, 2016 12:45pm
1000 carries; no championships.Azubuike24;1788480 wrote:Not one with only 1000 carries.
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Mar 22, 2016 12:59pm
I'm just saying, there's a perception that Morris is some veteran RB. Not a bad signing for Dallas.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Mar 22, 2016 1:16pm
Wut? LOLsleeper;1788483 wrote:1000 carries; no championships.
What the Hell do championships have to do with whether he's a decent pickup or not?
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Mar 22, 2016 1:20pm
I'm saying he's basically a non-factor. He doesn't help or hurt; he's not notable.BR1986FB;1788486 wrote:Wut? LOL
What the Hell do championships have to do with whether he's a decent pickup or not?
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Mar 22, 2016 1:29pm
They don't.BR1986FB;1788486 wrote:Wut? LOL
What the Hell do championships have to do with whether he's a decent pickup or not?
Iliketurtles
Posts: 8,191
Mar 22, 2016 2:16pm
As a Cowboys fan I like it. Hopefully it also means they won't draft one in the first 3-4 rounds.
iclfan2
Posts: 6,360
Mar 23, 2016 10:38am
The touchback rule has passed. Coming out to 25 instead of 20. Interesting... And stupid imo
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Mar 23, 2016 10:42am
Not really stupid. It's just a slow and backwards way for the NFL to eliminate the kickoff. Just taking it away is too big of a change, but they are slowly making it an irrelevant play. Due to the onside kick, I don't think you could just eliminate it. However, I do think there should be an option just to waive your kickoff and give the other team the ball. Hell, just running down the field at a full sprint to coverage a potential return can lead to injury.
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Mar 23, 2016 10:44am
Furthermore, the PR aspect of this would hurt the NFL too. Who covers kicks, for the most part? The lowest-paid, irrelevant players on an NFL roster. Who are the most likely to make waves about CTE risks and safety? The lowest-paid, irrelevant players on an NFL roster. Your superstar players are likely to comment less because they are getting paid millions to assume this risk.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Mar 23, 2016 10:46am
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Mar 23, 2016 11:01am
This was a smart pickup. The guy's a team player, not a head case and very humble. Type of player you'd want on your team.Iliketurtles;1788502 wrote:As a Cowboys fan I like it. Hopefully it also means they won't draft one in the first 3-4 rounds.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Mar 23, 2016 11:01am
This is actually the solution. No team is going to try and actually return the ball these days.Azubuike24;1788552 wrote:Not really stupid. It's just a slow and backwards way for the NFL to eliminate the kickoff. Just taking it away is too big of a change, but they are slowly making it an irrelevant play. Due to the onside kick, I don't think you could just eliminate it. However, I do think there should be an option just to waive your kickoff and give the other team the ball. Hell, just running down the field at a full sprint to coverage a potential return can lead to injury.
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Mar 23, 2016 11:14am
http://deadspin.com/new-touchback-rule-designed-to-reduce-number-of-kickoff-1766603355sleeper;1788563 wrote:This is actually the solution. No team is going to try and actually return the ball these days.
Or not, as this column cites logic saying that if touchbacks move the ball out to the 25 instead of the 20, that gives teams more incentive to not boom the ball out of the end zone to try to force them to have to return it.
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Mar 23, 2016 11:53am
The Bengals do this on purpose. Strategically try to kick the ball to be caught right on the goal line and hope their coverage team can cut the returner down before the 20. It makes sense.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Mar 23, 2016 12:22pm
How's that worked for the college game? Touchbacks are the norm and you rarely see a team try to return the ball.Heretic;1788565 wrote:http://deadspin.com/new-touchback-rule-designed-to-reduce-number-of-kickoff-1766603355
Or not, as this column cites logic saying that if touchbacks move the ball out to the 25 instead of the 20, that gives teams more incentive to not boom the ball out of the end zone to try to force them to have to return it.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Mar 23, 2016 12:23pm
So sooo dumb.Automatik;1788554 wrote:Jerry being Jerry
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/15047068/jerry-jones-says-not-convinced-link-cte-football
Benny The Jet
Posts: 2,987
Mar 23, 2016 12:37pm
I agree with this. Feel like you're going to see a lot more kickers try and get as much height as possible and shorten it, to get down the field.Heretic;1788565 wrote:http://deadspin.com/new-touchback-rule-designed-to-reduce-number-of-kickoff-1766603355
Or not, as this column cites logic saying that if touchbacks move the ball out to the 25 instead of the 20, that gives teams more incentive to not boom the ball out of the end zone to try to force them to have to return it.