majorspark;1805944 wrote:I have more integrity. I will not vote for the corrupt liar. Nor can I bring myself to vote for the charlatan Trump so I guess I get a small share. My pride is I will vote my conscience whether that is Gary Johnson (doubtful at this point) or none I will do my part. I am tired of being shepherded into the corral of the lesser of two evils. Enjoy being one of the sheep.

BoatShoes;1805954 wrote:Worth noting that those landslides were in part caused by anti-civil rights democrats voting republican and ultimately leaving the democratic party altogether by today.

Which of course is why the Dems buy minority votes meme is so dumb. A corrupt and cynical LBJ actually redeemed himself and sold the white vote down the river for the right thing and the dems faced an uphill battle until 08.

You do do realize that in the 60s all 3 Civio Rights acts passed Congress with more % republicans voting for than democrats voting for right?

gut;1805949 wrote:LMFAO. You tools would all work for me if you were smart enough...instead you work for people who work for people who work for me. That's what makes you Democrats, because you can't excel on your own merits.

It's ok....Bite down harder on the blanket and your fears will go away.

Okay, Tiernan.

I'm currently job searching.

gut....any openings?

Automatik;1805973 wrote:I'm currently job searching.

gut....any openings?

You'll have to ask someone who works for someone who works for him.

jmog;1805967 wrote:WW2 started in 1939, 77 years. Most people would understand rounding numbers but you obviously don't.

both you and your article talk about "since World War II". Since World War II starts in 1945, 71 years ago. Of course later in writing you talk about 80 years ago. 80 years ago is 1936. That is the year of the largest electoral landslide since 1820.

jmog;1805968 wrote:You do do realize that in the 60s all 3 Civio Rights acts passed Congress with more % republicans voting for than democrats voting for right?

In 1964 the Republicans ran Barry Goldwater for President, he opposed the 1964 Civil Rights Bill. That opposition won him the electoral voters of South Carolina. Georgia, Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana. The beginning of the Republican switch to replacing the Democrats as the "white man's" party.

isadore;1805975 wrote:both you and your article talk about "since World War II". Since World War II starts in 1945, 71 years ago. Of course later in writing you talk about 80 years ago. 80 years ago is 1936. That is the year of the largest electoral landslide since 1820.

You still lied about lbj.

Which is it, liar or stupid?

Lyndon Johnson won the 1964 election in one of the great landslides in United States history. He had the highest % of popular vote since 1820.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_presidential_elections_by_popular_vote_margin

isadore;1805979 wrote:Lyndon Johnson won the 1964 election in one of the great landslides in United States history. He had the highest % of popular vote since 1820.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_presidential_elections_by_popular_vote_margin

Still wasn't in the top three like you claimed.

So which is it? Liar or stupid?

FDR and Lyndon Johnson had the two biggest landslides in popular vote from 1820 to the present.

But we were clearly talking about Electoral vote.
1. FDR
2. Reagan
3. Nixon
4. Reagan

So, which is it? Liar or stupid?

superman;1805998 wrote:But we were clearly talking about Electoral vote.
1. FDR
2. Reagan
3. Nixon
4. Reagan

So, which is it? Liar or stupid?

Jesus fucking Christ who cares lol. How many times are you going to post the same thing?

ZWICK 4 PREZ;1806003 wrote:Jesus fucking Christ who cares lol. How many times are you going to post the same thing?

I'm going to troll the troll until he answers.

isadore;1805976 wrote:In 1964 the Republicans ran Barry Goldwater for President, he opposed the 1964 Civil Rights Bill. That opposition won him the electoral voters of South Carolina. Georgia, Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana. The beginning of the Republican switch to replacing the Democrats as the "white man's" party.

I agree that Goldwater was a disaster and the fact that POTUS elections are 1000x more visible than Congressional votes the Goldwater campaign changed the narrative that the Rs were for Civil rights and the ads were more against it.

Goldwater was a minority opposition during the civil rights acts passing, that is a fact and he ruined the public perception of republicans in the eyes of African Americans.

jmog;1806007 wrote:I agree that Goldwater was a disaster and the fact that POTUS elections are 1000x more visible than Congressional votes the Goldwater campaign changed the narrative that the Rs were for Civil rights and the ads were more against it.

Goldwater was a minority opposition during the civil rights acts passing, that is a fact and he ruined the public perception of republicans in the eyes of African Americans.

gosh a ruddies
Then they began to emphasizing support for states rights, opposition to busing, attacks on "welfare queens" all issues to attract southern white stands. gosh they still throw them red meat. A few weeks ago one of Trump's sons was down supporting the flying of the Confederate flag.

jmog;1805968 wrote:You do do realize that in the 60s all 3 Civio Rights acts passed Congress with more % republicans voting for than democrats voting for right?

Yes Jmog. And those liberal Midwestern and northeastern Republicans are now Democrats and the Conservative White George Wallace Democrats now vote for Trump in the Republican Party.

Bill McCullough would be run out of his district today if he worked with a Democrat today like he did with LBJ.

So try to follow along...the Conservative racists left the Democratic party for the Republican party and now they primary and lampoon moderate liberal Republicans like Bill McCullough who are no longer welcome and now vote Democrat.

There are no more liberal Republicans and no more conservative Democrats.

BoatShoes;1805953 wrote:The Mother of Lies. A pretty good one. She should put on an eye patch and tattoo that phrase on her neck as she vanquishes her enemies, sees them driven before her and relishes in the lamentations of national review pundits and white nationalist Trump supporters.

Did you change your underwear after you had this dream?

BoatShoes;1805953 wrote:John Adams would be proud. So too would George Washington who was called a liar and a fraud for assenting to the whiskey tax and then he rode in against the rebels, crushed them and took their guns. I can see the Mother of Lies riding with similar grace into mercer county on a Predator Drone.

Maybe Washington embellished some of his heroics during the French and Indian war? Maybe John Adams was a political reprobate of the highest order? I could search historical documents, study the writings of men who have been dead for a couple of centuries, try to weigh any possible biases the authors may have, try to establish historical context, or I can watch a video of a politician uttering lies in her own words with my own two eyes. Then with my own two eyes watch here tell me I did not see what I saw. Or her tall tail was a result of sleep deprivation.

This liar is alive and well wants to be POTUS. If believing the founders were devient reprobates who passed their trade onto crooked Hillary assuages some of the shame you feel in voting for her. I get it. Whatever floats your boat.

This goes out to my OC friends for those of you who've decided that voting for Trump or Hillary is not a good idea and voting for third-party please reconsider. you falling into the trap of the media believing that you have an option and that would be a third party we all have to agree that neither Trump nor Hillary are what's America's should really have as a candidates for presidency but it is what it is. this election is not about the candidates themselves. So don't buy into that hype that the media is trying to sell you. This election is about whether you want to accept the career politician fraud corruption and irresponsibility of Washington Hillary Clinton or the presidency of a Donald Trump who is a non-politician speaks his mind type individual and brash unorthodox business type. for me I'm an entrepreneur I'm also a veteran I cannot accept the fact that we have four dead people based upon a lie and incompetency Hillary Clinton. I can understand the fact that many of you do not accept Donald Trump because of his brashness and the fact that he's never been in politics. But that is the exact point do we want to continue to accept the lying cheating of career politicians or is a time that we step up and say no more we are Americans we want to truth and we wants what's best for our country and not an agenda set forth by some party we want change and we want what's best for America . It's time to for change and if choosing a Donald Trump is wrong then let it be wrong but choosing a Hillary Clinton is accepting the fact that Washington DC will have control over you keep lying to the American public continued the fraud and corruption to profit for themselves. Don't compromise and vote third-party make a hard-line decision send messaging to Washington we no longer will accept the corruption and lies

I really don't care how brash Trump is. I'm kinda glad that he is willing to say, on a national stage, what everybody else on that platform is too afraid to say and rely instead on political rebranding/doublespeak.

But I'm not going to vote for him just for that.

CenterBHSFan;1806066 wrote:I really don't care how brash Trump is. I'm kinda glad that he is willing to say, on a national stage, what everybody else on that platform is too afraid to say and rely instead on political rebranding/doublespeak.

But I'm not going to vote for him just for that.

Exactly, it's about time someone stopped treating these people like they are above us. Most of them are people who were in the right place at the right time and said the right things to the right people and ride the gravy train at our expense. I meet our congressmen 3 or 4 times a year these guys are nothing special. Its nice to have someone knock them down a peg or two when needed and in Hillary's case I don't think there is enough time for all the pegs.

I have no idea who I am voting for yet as of now a vote for Trump is a vote against Hillary and that is all. I am caught between wondering if this is all a scheme to get Hillary elected or it was all a scheme to keep him dominating the headlines and now we will see him "close the deal" with real policies and real plans ahead of the November vote. But until then it's great to see these career politicians get shit on and called out for their abuse of the system.

majorspark;1806057 wrote:Did you change your underwear after you had this dream?



Maybe Washington embellished some of his heroics during the French and Indian war? Maybe John Adams was a political reprobate of the highest order? I could search historical documents, study the writings of men who have been dead for a couple of centuries, try to weigh any possible biases the authors may have, try to establish historical context, or I can watch a video of a politician uttering lies in her own words with my own two eyes. Then with my own two eyes watch here tell me I did not see what I saw. Or her tall tail was a result of sleep deprivation.

This liar is alive and well wants to be POTUS. If believing the founders were devient reprobates who passed their trade onto crooked Hillary assuages some of the shame you feel in voting for her. I get it. Whatever floats your boat.

I just suppose I am not sanctimonious enough to get that upset when I pull the lever for the Mother of Lies. I can accept her because she orders her political killings in secret. If she killed a man in cold blood right out in the open for having been accused of cheating on a horse race like Andrew Jackson that would be a bridge too far I suppose and I would vote for Donald J. Trump to nuke people who make fun of his fingers.

CenterBHSFan;1806066 wrote:I really don't care how brash Trump is. I'm kinda glad that he is willing to say, on a national stage, what everybody else on that platform is too afraid to say and rely instead on political rebranding/doublespeak.

But I'm not going to vote for him just for that.

IOW he speaks at a 4th grade level with exaggerated hyperbole and ignorance. What is it people are thinking but won't say...that we should ban Muslims from immigrating into the country and devote huge national resources to deporting 11 million illegal aliens and spend $25-$50 billion on a border wall?

bases_loaded;1806137 wrote:Exactly, it's about time someone stopped treating these people like they are above us. Most of them are people who were in the right place at the right time and said the right things to the right people and ride the gravy train at our expense. I meet our congressmen 3 or 4 times a year these guys are nothing special. Its nice to have someone knock them down a peg or two when needed and in Hillary's case I don't think there is enough time for all the pegs.

I have no idea who I am voting for yet as of now a vote for Trump is a vote against Hillary and that is all. I am caught between wondering if this is all a scheme to get Hillary elected or it was all a scheme to keep him dominating the headlines and now we will see him "close the deal" with real policies and real plans ahead of the November vote. But until then it's great to see these career politicians get shit on and called out for their abuse of the system.

Take a career politician/public servant like George Voinovich or John Glenn - two men who humbly and honorably served the public their whole lives - Donald Trump has served himself his whole life but he is the Honorable one!

BoatShoes;1806138 wrote:.....and I would vote for Donald J. Trump to nuke people who make fun of his fingers.

who do you really believe you are influencing with such sophomoric drivel

BoatShoes;1806140 wrote:IOW he speaks at a 4th grade level with exaggerated hyperbole and ignorance. What is it people are thinking but won't say...that we should ban Muslims from immigrating into the country and devote huge national resources to deporting 11 million illegal aliens and spend $25-$50 billion on a border wall?

Completely false and erroneous, but who cares when you can get away with it.