IggyPride00
Posts: 6,482
Jan 12, 2016 12:00am
Alabama might need that timeout they needlessly burned there.
S
Sonofanump
Jan 12, 2016 12:04am
Can't take those timeouts with you Dabo. Just lost 38 seconds.
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Jan 12, 2016 12:06am
Lol'dCommander of Awesome;1774928 wrote:The C on their helmet is for Nowledge
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Jan 12, 2016 12:06am
Now....it's all but over
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Jan 12, 2016 12:07am
Timeout dope
S
Sonofanump
Jan 12, 2016 12:08am
Clemson needs a special teams coach next year.
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Jan 12, 2016 12:09am
Thinking Jerome Bettis fumble in Indy AFC Championship
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Jan 12, 2016 12:10am
Good late call...risky by Henry
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Jan 12, 2016 12:11am
Lost in a sea of humanity is one of my favorite lines of the season.
S
Sonofanump
Jan 12, 2016 12:13am
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Jan 12, 2016 12:18am
Fuck bama
S
superman
Posts: 3,582
Jan 12, 2016 12:19am
Would you have flagged that?Sonofanump;1774942 wrote:
S
Sonofanump
Jan 12, 2016 12:20am
A delusional non-player behind the restricted line? No.superman;1774944 wrote:Would you have flagged that?
S
Sonofanump
Jan 12, 2016 12:22am
I was hoping that fumble on the 2pt try would have gone into the end zone and recovered by Clemson, then watch the shitstorm when the score would have been waived off.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Jan 12, 2016 8:24am
Spock
Posts: 2,853
Jan 12, 2016 8:30am
ANother year of SEC nuthugging by ESPN
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Jan 12, 2016 9:45am
Clemson has a lot of potential guys who could declare on defense, but their offense returns Watson, Gallman, Scott, Renfrow, Cain and Leggett. They are going to be fun to watch next year. They have at least 5 Juniors who could leave off the defense though...
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Jan 12, 2016 9:54am
hmmmm, sounds eerily familiarAzubuike24;1774993 wrote:.... but their offense returns Watson, Gallman, Scott, Renfrow, Cain and Leggett. They are going to be fun to watch next year...
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Jan 12, 2016 10:29am
They came up short though. No doubt that group will be motivated to achieve what they didn't. Big difference from OSU...vball10set;1774995 wrote:hmmmm, sounds eerily familiar
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Jan 12, 2016 10:56am
They did poorly last season and this year was still SEC nuthugging. The SEC could go 0-8 in bowl games to all blow out losses and they will still have the most teams ranked pre-season and ESPN will still toot their horn.Spock;1774963 wrote:ANother year of SEC nuthugging by ESPN
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Jan 12, 2016 11:19am
To be fair, the SEC did pretty much dominate bowl season this year. Other than Florida. There's always what-ifs, but A&M probably beats Louisville if they aren't starting a 4th string QB.
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Jan 12, 2016 11:21am
I'll also say though...outside of Alabama, the SEC doesn't have another top 10 program. They have a ton of them in the 11-50 range, almost the entire conference, but a single dominant program shouldn't automatically make the league better.
If anything, the SEC is in for a lot of future seasons like this. They have a bunch of very good programs, 9-10 of them a year who could make noise. They could also lose 5-6 games.
If anything, the SEC is in for a lot of future seasons like this. They have a bunch of very good programs, 9-10 of them a year who could make noise. They could also lose 5-6 games.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Jan 12, 2016 11:27am
No different than any other conference then.Azubuike24;1775023 wrote:I'll also say though...outside of Alabama, the SEC doesn't have another top 10 program. They have a ton of them in the 11-50 range, almost the entire conference, but a single dominant program shouldn't automatically make the league better.
If anything, the SEC is in for a lot of future seasons like this. They have a bunch of very good programs, 9-10 of them a year who could make noise. They could also lose 5-6 games.
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Jan 12, 2016 11:37am
Disagree. I think other conferences are much more clearly defined 2-6. My point was though, I'd probably take the top 3-5 in other conferences over the SEC right now, only because picking their top 5 would be much easier. I mean, the SEC had a team go winless in the conference and the next season, went to the national title game. That's pretty mind-blowing. It just doesn't happen.
S
Sonofanump
Jan 12, 2016 12:06pm
Are you referring to the year Auburn won the Cam Newton bidding war?Azubuike24;1775036 wrote: I mean, the SEC had a team go winless in the conference and the next season, went to the national title game. That's pretty mind-blowing. It just doesn't happen.