2016 Browns Season Thread

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Pro Sports ▸ 2016 Browns Season Thread
bases_loaded's avatar

bases_loaded

Senior Member

6,912 posts
Dec 13, 2016 2:41 PM
How can you say Pac Man got the better of Pryor with RGIII lobbing grenades out there?
Dec 13, 2016 2:41pm
Ironman92's avatar

Ironman92

Administrator

49,363 posts
Dec 13, 2016 3:47 PM
Benny The Jet;1828538 wrote:What would it take, a 4th? I know at some point you have to pull the trigger on someone...but an oft injured QB behind our current line....Romo may literally die behind them.
I would do a 4th for risk that Romo would be a good QB for 1 year. Stockpiling picks is great but the fans deserve some hope they are going to have a good QB.
Dec 13, 2016 3:47pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Dec 13, 2016 4:10 PM
If the Browns could get Romo for a 4th round pick, and they don't do it? Well let's just say id snap
Dec 13, 2016 4:10pm
Azubuike24's avatar

Azubuike24

Senior Member

15,933 posts
Dec 13, 2016 4:55 PM
The Browns have more picks than they will have roster spots. Why not?

Would you sign Alshon Jeffery over Terrelle Pryor?
Dec 13, 2016 4:55pm
Benny The Jet's avatar

Benny The Jet

Senior Member

2,987 posts
Dec 13, 2016 5:07 PM
Azubuike24;1828556 wrote:The Browns have more picks than they will have roster spots. Why not?

Would you sign Alshon Jeffery over Terrelle Pryor?
That's a good one. If they were to cost the same...give me Jeffery. He's also a year younger.
Dec 13, 2016 5:07pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Dec 14, 2016 11:15 AM
Mcshay posted his first mock. He has the browns taking Johnathan Allen and Takkarist McKinley.

He has only one QB (the dude from UNC) going in the first round and its the 30th pick.
Dec 14, 2016 11:15am
Mulva's avatar

Mulva

Senior Member

13,650 posts
Dec 14, 2016 11:17 AM
I would not trade for Romo. That's a waste.
Dec 14, 2016 11:17am
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Dec 14, 2016 11:21 AM
like_that;1828638 wrote:Mcshay posted his first mock. He has the browns taking Johnathan Allen and Takkarist McKinley.

He has only one QB (the dude from UNC) going in the first round and its the 30th pick.
That happened last year, too. First mocks came out and not a QB in sight. Then a few emerged. Should be the same thing this year. I'd bet a million dollars a QB goes in the first 30 picks.
Dec 14, 2016 11:21am
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Dec 14, 2016 11:22 AM
CBS had the Browns taking Trubisky 1 overall just 2 weeks ago.
Dec 14, 2016 11:22am
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Dec 14, 2016 11:22 AM
Mulva;1828640 wrote:I would not trade for Romo. That's a waste.
Yeah def a waste to get a top 10'ish QB. It's not like the browns need a good QB or anything. And besides, gotta salvage those mid round draft picks!!
Dec 14, 2016 11:22am
Benny The Jet's avatar

Benny The Jet

Senior Member

2,987 posts
Dec 14, 2016 11:31 AM
Off the top of my head...these teams all need a QB.
Browns
Jets
49ers
Bears
Bills (maybe)
Cardinals (maybe)
Anyone else? I would find it really hard to believe that Trubisky is the only 1st rounder and he's #30. I'd say someone will end up a top 10 pick.
Dec 14, 2016 11:31am
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Dec 14, 2016 12:03 PM
I think a QB of value will fall to the 2nd.
Dec 14, 2016 12:03pm
iclfan2's avatar

iclfan2

Reppin' the 330/216/843

6,360 posts
Dec 14, 2016 12:20 PM
like_that;1828638 wrote:Mcshay posted his first mock. He has the browns taking Johnathan Allen and Takkarist McKinley.

He has only one QB (the dude from UNC) going in the first round and its the 30th pick.
That sounds stupid. Garret is by far the best player in the draft. And no way a QB doesn't go until 30. I'll take garret and trubisky all day.
Dec 14, 2016 12:20pm
Crimson streak's avatar

Crimson streak

Senior Member

9,002 posts
Dec 14, 2016 12:21 PM
I think it all depends where the eagles pick falls on what we do at number 1. I'm curious to see what qb comes out as the leader after work outs and such


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dec 14, 2016 12:21pm
Mulva's avatar

Mulva

Senior Member

13,650 posts
Dec 14, 2016 1:12 PM
SportsAndLady;1828644 wrote:Yeah def a waste to get a top 10'ish QB. It's not like the browns need a good QB or anything. And besides, gotta salvage those mid round draft picks!!
He'll be 37 this off season. He doesn't fit the Browns timeframe. All it does is postpone making a decision on the future.
Dec 14, 2016 1:12pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Dec 14, 2016 1:17 PM
Mulva;1828656 wrote:He'll be 37 this off season. He doesn't fit the Browns timeframe. All it does is postpone making a decision on the future.
Start Romo for a year or two, but still look for your QB of the future. This isn't rocket science. It'll be good to get a few average to above average seasons once in a while to start the future of the franchise. Rather than just completely suck for the next two years until everyone gets some experience.

It's a win-win for the Browns.
Dec 14, 2016 1:17pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Dec 14, 2016 1:43 PM
iclfan2;1828653 wrote:That sounds stupid. Garret is by far the best player in the draft. And no way a QB doesn't go until 30. I'll take garret and trubisky all day.
He probably is factoring in the stupidity of the Cleveland browns.
Dec 14, 2016 1:43pm
Heretic's avatar

Heretic

Son of the Sun

18,820 posts
Dec 14, 2016 2:39 PM
iclfan2;1828653 wrote:That sounds stupid. Garret is by far the best player in the draft. And no way a QB doesn't go until 30. I'll take garret and trubisky all day.
That's what I hate about this way-too-early mocks. You know that as the combines start, everyone will start jizzing about one quarterback or another and he'll jump up to a top-five slot on everyone's board.
Dec 14, 2016 2:39pm
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Dec 14, 2016 3:13 PM
lol S&L going full S&L about reaching for a QB again. Romo wouldn't make it out of preseason here, trading anything for him would be foolish.
Dec 14, 2016 3:13pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Dec 14, 2016 3:19 PM
Absolutely foolish! We're doing just fine the way we believe will then things around! 4th rounders are way too valuable to give up for a good QB!
Dec 14, 2016 3:19pm
Automatik's avatar

Automatik

Senior Member

14,632 posts
Dec 14, 2016 3:20 PM
I'm not sure he would last longer than RG3.
Dec 14, 2016 3:20pm
Crimson streak's avatar

Crimson streak

Senior Member

9,002 posts
Dec 14, 2016 3:44 PM
The only way I'm trading for romo is if we still take a qb either at 1 or the eagles pick. The offensive line can be filled out with our 2nd rounders or fa. Bitonio and Thomas on the left side are one of the best left sides in the game. As long as we fill out the right side and get a god damn capable center the offensive line will be fine. But a first round of Garrett/ trubisky or Kizer would be absolutely amazing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dec 14, 2016 3:44pm
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Dec 14, 2016 3:52 PM
Crimson streak;1828691 wrote:The only way I'm trading for romo is if we still take a qb either at 1 or the eagles pick. The offensive line can be filled out with our 2nd rounders or fa. Bitonio and Thomas on the left side are one of the best left sides in the game. As long as we fill out the right side and get a god damn capable center the offensive line will be fine. But a first round of Garrett/ trubisky or Kizer would be absolutely amazing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm actually fine with our online. Tell Erving to GFH, slide Greco to center, Cooper at RG, Coleman/Drango/Paztor battle it out for RT. Groom one for LT. That's a great oline.
Dec 14, 2016 3:52pm