Apple
Posts: 2,620
Oct 29, 2015 10:05pm
Kind of surprised nothing has been started about this yet on the OC.
From Ohio SoS site:
http://www.sos.state.oh.us/SOS/elections/Voters/whatsontheballot/2015Issues.aspx
Issue 1: Creates a bipartisan, public process for drawing legislative districts
Issue 2: Anti-monopoloy amendment; protects the initiative process from being used for personal economical benefit.
Issue 3: Grants a monopoly for the commercial production and sale of marijuana for recreational and medicinal purposes.
How will you vote:
From Ohio SoS site:
http://www.sos.state.oh.us/SOS/elections/Voters/whatsontheballot/2015Issues.aspx
Issue 1: Creates a bipartisan, public process for drawing legislative districts
Issue 2: Anti-monopoloy amendment; protects the initiative process from being used for personal economical benefit.
Issue 3: Grants a monopoly for the commercial production and sale of marijuana for recreational and medicinal purposes.
How will you vote:
Apple
Posts: 2,620
Oct 29, 2015 10:09pm
I'm pretty sure I'm going no on 1 and 2 and yes on 3. Someone can try to convince me otherwise.
cruiser_96
Posts: 7,536
Oct 29, 2015 10:56pm
As if Issue 1 is going to change anything. It will still be a corrupt way to draw lines only instead of having one party we'll have two. What a joke!?
fish82
Posts: 4,111
Oct 30, 2015 6:28am
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
HitsRus
Posts: 9,206
Oct 30, 2015 9:42am
no no yes
W
wkfan
Posts: 1,641
Oct 30, 2015 10:37am
Yes
No
No
No
No
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Oct 30, 2015 12:03pm
Yes
Yes
Hell No
Yes
Hell No
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Oct 30, 2015 12:16pm
No, No, Yes
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
Oct 30, 2015 12:34pm
yes, yes, yes
Belly35
Posts: 9,716
Oct 30, 2015 12:52pm
Yes
Yes
? ..... reason is medical, is what puts me on the fence on this issue
Yes
? ..... reason is medical, is what puts me on the fence on this issue
hasbeen
Posts: 6,504
Oct 30, 2015 1:01pm
isn't a yes on 2 make a yes on 3 meaningless?isadore;1759874 wrote:yes, yes, yes
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Oct 30, 2015 1:20pm
I think so. At least I'm pretty sure that virtually all the pro-3 commercials specifically tie the two issues together in a "NO ON 2, YES ON 3" way.hasbeen;1759886 wrote:isn't a yes on 2 make a yes on 3 meaningless?
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Oct 30, 2015 1:21pm
Truehasbeen;1759886 wrote:isn't a yes on 2 make a yes on 3 meaningless?
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Oct 30, 2015 1:22pm
Belly35;1759882 wrote:Yes
Yes
? ..... reason is medical, is what puts me on the fence on this issue
legislature working on a medical-only bill .............don't sell your soul to the drug cartels.
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Oct 30, 2015 3:59pm
Apple;1759777 wrote:I'm pretty sure I'm going no on 1 and 2 and yes on 3. Someone can try to convince me otherwise.
http://www.informz.net/ohiomfg/data/images/No_on_3_FAQ.pdf
http://www.informz.net/ohiomfg/data/images/Issue_3_Flyer.pdf
BRF
Posts: 8,748
Oct 30, 2015 4:22pm
The opposite for me.fish82;1759806 wrote:No
Yes
No
W
Wolves of Babylon
Posts: 408
Oct 30, 2015 10:14pm
SMH
https://reason.com/blog/2014/08/15/drug-warriors-try-but-fail-to-show-that
Sent from my VS986 using Tapatalk
S
superman
Posts: 3,582
Oct 31, 2015 3:38pm
No
Yes
Yes
While i realize that a yes on 2 negates a Yes on 3, i want them both to pass. A yes on 2 should be the law. Enough Yes votes on 3 might make the idiots in Columbus realize that weed should be legal.
Yes
Yes
While i realize that a yes on 2 negates a Yes on 3, i want them both to pass. A yes on 2 should be the law. Enough Yes votes on 3 might make the idiots in Columbus realize that weed should be legal.
C
Con_Alma
Posts: 12,198
Oct 31, 2015 8:35pm
Issue 1 No
Issue 2 Yes
Issue 3 No
Issue 2 Yes
Issue 3 No
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Oct 31, 2015 11:51pm
Yes
No
Undecided
No
Undecided
I don't trust the General Assembly as far as I can throw them. They are beyond out of touch with the citizens of their state.QuakerOats;1759892 wrote:legislature working on a medical-only bill .............don't sell your soul to the drug cartels.
SnotBubbles
Posts: 4,492
Nov 2, 2015 1:01pm
Issue 1: No
Issue 2: Yes
Issue 3: No
I am for the legalization of marijuana, but Issue 3 is not the way to go about it. It's funny, people are so anxious to get it passed they are blinded by all of the ignorant shit written in it.
Slow down folks. If you want marijuana legalized like it should be, have some patience and wait until the bill is written in a fair and less idiotic fashion.
Issue 2: Yes
Issue 3: No
I am for the legalization of marijuana, but Issue 3 is not the way to go about it. It's funny, people are so anxious to get it passed they are blinded by all of the ignorant shit written in it.
Slow down folks. If you want marijuana legalized like it should be, have some patience and wait until the bill is written in a fair and less idiotic fashion.
W
Wolves of Babylon
Posts: 408
Nov 2, 2015 4:39pm
I agree. Issue 3 is a bad bill but Marijuana should be legal.SnotBubbles;1760401 wrote:Issue 1: No
Issue 2: Yes
Issue 3: No
I am for the legalization of marijuana, but Issue 3 is not the way to go about it. It's funny, people are so anxious to get it passed they are blinded by all of the ignorant shit written in it.
Slow down folks. If you want marijuana legalized like it should be, have some patience and wait until the bill is written in a fair and less idiotic fashion.
Sent from my VS986 using Tapatalk
dontcare
Posts: 425
Nov 2, 2015 6:40pm
I had a nice meeting with my employees this morning. Told them if issue 3 passes, I will make them randomly take a drug test whenever I want. It they refuse, they are fired, if they test positive for marijuana, they are fired. None of them had an issue with that. Happy voting folks.
S
superman
Posts: 3,582
Nov 2, 2015 6:50pm
So you're going to fire them for doing something that's legal? Hope you have a good lawyer.dontcare;1760473 wrote:I had a nice meeting with my employees this morning. Told them if issue 3 passes, I will make them randomly take a drug test whenever I want. It they refuse, they are fired, if they test positive for marijuana, they are fired. None of them had an issue with that. Happy voting folks.
dontcare
Posts: 425
Nov 2, 2015 7:09pm
I sure will. They have all signed a contract that says so. Imagine getting fired for doing a legal drug. If their job and supporting their family is more important to them they won't do it. If people don't like it, well, that's tough shit.superman;1760474 wrote:So you're going to fire them for doing something that's legal? Hope you have a good lawyer.