Con_Alma;1790843 wrote:I can with certain say your post is not my position what-so-ever and my opinion on the question originally asked was not Biblically based.

sleeper;1790830 wrote:That's great. But you do not have the right to make that choice for other women who may think differently than you.

My stance is quite simple; don't like abortion? Don't have one.

sleeper;1790845 wrote:I really don't care about what your position. My statement is only to definitively state that your position is not rooted in science, logic or reality. If it's not rooted in those 3, it's irrelevant and only belongs in a dumpster along with the rest of the trash of society.

jmog;1790846 wrote:Unless you can find a post and quote it where I have said that abortion should be illegal in all cases, even rape and safety of the mother, I suggest you actually read what was posted.

sleeper;1790830 wrote:
My stance is quite simple; don't like abortion? Don't have one.

QuakerOats;1790847 wrote:We get it; you don't believe in your Creator.

Move on.

superman;1790850 wrote:The exact same argument was used by the pro-slavery movement.

sleeper;1790849 wrote:I wasn't disagreeing with you. Just wanted to add to your post.

sleeper;1790852 wrote:Right because the owning of one person, a free individual with equal rights, is the same as telling women what to do with their bodies because you believe in an invisible ghost in the sky.

Nice though!

jmog;1790853 wrote:That's not actually what you said, unless you have a terrible understanding of the English language (which you do not). You just changed your stance when you realized I was right (that I haven't ever said that abortions should be illegal in all cases).

You have a personal need to ALWAYS be "right", if that makes you feel better about yourself then so be it.

The rest of us see right through you though. It is possible to admit mistakes.

jmog;1790854 wrote:Reading comprehension, he didn't say the two were morally equal, he said that the same argument was used.

sleeper;1790845 wrote:I really don't care about what your position. My statement is only to definitively state that your position is not rooted in science, logic or reality. If it's not rooted in those 3, it's irrelevant and only belongs in a dumpster along with the rest of the trash of society.

sleeper;1790851 wrote:Believe? No I don't believe in things that are not supported by logic, evidence, or reason.

Why do I care then? Because the people that do believe in this trash and want policy to reflect those ignorant beliefs exist to restrict the rights of others in a free country. These people are trash and deserve nothing.

Also abortion is legal. Move on!

Con_Alma;1790862 wrote:You are welcomed to "put it", my position, wherever you choose.

Con_Alma;1790863 wrote:Has anyone in this thread advocated for restricting the rights of others?

sleeper;1790864 wrote:I don't need your blessing. This is America; land of legal abortions and equal rights for women.

sleeper;1790865 wrote:Yes. You would like women to give birth if their life is in danger. That is restricting the rights of others and is extremely barbaric. The irony.

Con_Alma;1790868 wrote:The woman has the right to choose whether she will try and give birth or not. I don't nor do I suggest that I should have that right.

sleeper;1790869 wrote:Correct. And you never will.

sleeper;1790869 wrote:Correct. And you never will.

sleeper;1790851 wrote:Also abortion is legal. Move on!

QuakerOats;1790880 wrote:Whether legal or not; it is wrong. And that is what matters.

jmog;1790872 wrote:Once again Sleeper was 100% wrong but can't admit it so just changes what he 'meant'.

sleeper;1790883 wrote:Nope. It's not wrong and it's legal. Enjoy!

QuakerOats;1790902 wrote:May the love of God, the peace of Christ, and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with you, now and forever. Amen.