http://www.pennlive.com/opinion/2015/08/theres_no_hiding_planned_paren.html

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/421888/planned-parenthood-videos-abortion-taxpayer-subsidies

In a civil society I would assume the horrific, murderous acts of Planned Parenthood would generate far greater outrage than the taking of an animal (named Cecil) ............ we'll see.



http://thefederalist.com/2015/07/31/obama-appointee-blocks-more-video-releases-by-group-behind-planned-parenthood-sting/

obama appointee and bundler blocking release of more shocking videoes



http://www.infowars.com/democrats-who-voted-against-defunding-planned-parenthood-never-even-watched-the-expose-videos/

only senate democrats support the atrocities




It is hard to imagine the horrific acts commited against the innocent unborn, and the levels to which the left will go to cover it up and/or minimize and desensitize the issue. But God forbid if a lion gets shot. The radical Left is seriously ill.

Let me just settle in for this one.

QuakerOats;1744171 wrote:http://www.pennlive.com/opinion/2015/08/theres_no_hiding_planned_paren.html

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/421888/planned-parenthood-videos-abortion-taxpayer-subsidies

In a civil society I would assume the horrific, murderous acts of Planned Parenthood would generate far greater outrage than the taking of an animal (named Cecil) ............ we'll see.



http://thefederalist.com/2015/07/31/obama-appointee-blocks-more-video-releases-by-group-behind-planned-parenthood-sting/

obama appointee and bundler blocking release of more shocking videoes



http://www.infowars.com/democrats-who-voted-against-defunding-planned-parenthood-never-even-watched-the-expose-videos/

only senate democrats support the atrocities




It is hard to imagine the horrific acts commited against the innocent unborn, and the levels to which the left will go to cover it up and/or minimize and desensitize the issue. But God forbid if a lion gets shot. The radical Left is seriously ill.

Moved it to the proper forum, you fucking idiot.

Please do. If Cecil the African lion got 5 pages of comment, then discussion over horrific acts against humans ought to be into the hundreds of pages, if this is truly a civil society.

there shouldnt be one person on the planet that would support this.

Why was this moved to the political forum; Cecil the lion wasn't???

We are talking about horrific acts against the innocent.

Obama said, "Plan Parenthood babies could have been me 35 years ago." nooo way did he say that....

Obvious More Obvious by Belly:

In the Democrat Liberal mentality if you use a weapon (they call it a gun) to kill then that bad very bad, you lose a flag but if you use a uterine curette to kill innocent, defenseless babies it’s all good and you keep the money 350 million and the flag.

80% of all black abortion are done by PP fly that is about 1300 per day....

I don't see any problems with PP or their activities.

The research generated by the unborn fetuses (that weren't wanted anyway) contribute to valuable research that saves countless lives.

So at least one around here supports convenience murders ............... any others?

^^^...at monty....link?

...

The research generated by the unborn fetuses (that weren't wanted anyway)....

Oh, heck, why waste anything? Why don't just we grind up the parts we can't use and make ground meat to feed the homeless?

Ahh the abortion 3rd rail.....
I honestly don't care. I'm a dude.
As for funding, meh, if it is cut, it is cut. That is fine.

^^^yeah.....It took Hilary a week and a half to judge which way the winds were blowing...only after watching Bernie Sanders defend PP did she make up her mind.

Secretly, I bet, she had to be horrified, as anyone over the age of 50 is seeing the slippery slope of the legalization of abortion come to fruition. That Colonel Sanders defends PP comes as no surprise...the man is a flaming socialist so you already know what his moral standards are. Unless this was Abortion Inc. making obscene profits he could care less about human dignity.
Just when you think you've seen the depths of human depravity....

HitsRus;1744253 wrote:^^^...at monty....link?

...

Oh, heck, why waste anything? Why don't just we grind up the parts we can't use and make ground meat to feed the homeless?

baby lamps shades always lights up the room.

QuakerOats;1744252 wrote:So at least one around here supports convenience murders ............... any others?

Considering the alternative would be to watch you bitch twice as much about all the welfare people out there due to a rise in that population, sure.

Heretic;1744263 wrote:Considering the alternative would be to watch you bitch twice as much about all the welfare people out there due to a rise in that population, sure.

Maybe if the adoption process was streamlined and not a for profit industry, we could get the babies into loving homes.

I know if my girlfriend got pregnant right now that we would definitely take care of it, because neither of us are at a point in our lives to be raising a kid.

So to avoid being a huge hypocrite, I cannot say I'm against the concept of abortion.

lhslep134;1744271 wrote:I know if my girlfriend got pregnant right now she would accidentally be pushed down the steps.

Agreed.

lhslep134;1744271 wrote:I know if my girlfriend got pregnant right now that we would definitely take care of it, because neither of us are at a point in our lives to be raising a kid.

So to avoid being a huge hypocrite, I cannot say I'm against the concept of abortion.

http://umm.edu/health/medical/reports/presentations/condom-application-series

It doesn't take a college degree to figure this out.

http://plannedparenthood.org/learn/birth-control/iud

Even Planned parenthood agrees with this.

Abortion should not be an option and quite frankly should be a crime. There are many people who can't have kids, abortion is a slap in the face of those who cannot conceive. These people would love to have a child, unfortunately they fall into the minority. Maybe perhaps they ruffle some feathers and stake their claim as a minority group and get their way as any other does.

Well we all know that condoms are 100% effective and there's never been a pregnancy due to a defective condom, so great point bio-hazzzard!

lhslep134;1744282 wrote:Well we all know that condoms are 100% effective and there's never been a pregnancy due to a defective condom, so great point bio-hazzzard!

My wife damn near died at the birth of our child, our daughter was under 2lbs at birth. My wife's doctor advised her not to have any more children unless we adopt, so we took the proper steps and went with the IUD. We cannot have any more children of our own and to see human beings recklessly agreeing with abortion sickens my stomach. Just imagine if you aborted a child because "you weren't ready" and that was the last child of your own you could have had. I'm not trying to be a dick but for some of us this is a reality, and quite frankly it hurts to know that another child has been aborted because someone is not ready for a kid. The point of my previous post was to use whatever methods possible to prevent unwanted pregnancies, nobody knows what it's like until you wear our shoes.

lhslep134;1744282 wrote:Well we all know that condoms are 100% effective and there's never been a pregnancy due to a defective condom, so great point bio-hazzzard!

Let's be real though. 95% of the people who have babies when they shouldn't be having them/don't want them are pretty damn stupid people. There isn't a very high percentage of educated people who are having babies without wanting to have them. Condoms aren't 100% effective, but there are a combination of other birth control methods that a couple can use that makes it pretty much impossible to conceive a child.

I wrap my rascal two times, cuz I like it to be joyless and without sensation.

Bio-Hazzzzard;1744285 wrote:Just imagine if you aborted a child because "you weren't ready" and that was the last child of your own you could have had. I'm not trying to be a dick but for some of us this is a reality, and quite frankly it hurts to know that another child has been aborted because someone is not ready for a kid.

So you want to use your anecdotal reality as a basis for being against abortion, but I can't use my hypothetical as a basis for my belief?

I realize you're not trying to be a dick, and I'm trying to be delicate here because I don't want to be one to you either, but I find it a little unfair for you to use your personal feelings to defend your viewpoint while attacking my use of them.

I feel like I need to re-iterate this: I'm not trying to argue for or against abortion in general. That's a deeper-rooted argument involving a lot more than just my personal hypothetical.

like_that;1744286 wrote:Let's be real though. 95% of the people who have babies when they shouldn't be having them/don't want them are pretty damn stupid people. There isn't a very high percentage of educated people who are having babies without wanting to have them. Condoms aren't 100% effective, but there are a combination of other birth control methods that a couple can use that makes it pretty much impossible to conceive a child.

I bolded the part of your post that explains why I'm not arguing for or against abortion in general. Abortion is a religious argument, a sociological argument, and a demographic argument (to name a few).

It's really too deep of a topic for me to jump into because whether you're for or against it, your viewpoint is absolutely not changing. That's why I only posted what my response to a hypothetical situation would be. I simply can't speak on anyone else's viewpoints of this topic but my own if I was faced with a specific situation.

lhslep134;1744290 wrote:So you want to use your anecdotal reality as a basis for being against abortion, but I can't use my hypothetical as a basis for my belief?

I may have taken you the wrong way with your post. We all have different belief but sorry abortion to me is just wrong. Believe what you will, that's your given right and I will not argue with that.

lhslep134;1744290 wrote:I realize you're not trying to be a dick, and I'm trying to be delicate here because I don't want to be one to you either, but I find it a little unfair for you to use your personal feelings to defend your viewpoint while attacking my use of them.

If I attacked your viewpoints directing in my favor, I apologize for that. I can't digest your viewpoint at all, I guess this is where we disagree.

lhslep134;1744290 wrote:I feel like I need to re-iterate this: I'm not trying to argue for or against abortion in general. That's a deeper-rooted argument involving a lot more than just my personal hypothetical.

Point taken.