Wcal observer;1758474 wrote:O-Trap, I understand the point your making, but nothing was said that insinuated anything about Smithville, or them not deserving the win. In fact I congratulated them for not giving up when down, and being the stronger minded team. Have we become so sensitive as a society that we feel we need to be justified for everything we do now a days? The point is, the conversation had NOTHING to do with Smithville, and ALL about the lack of resiliency Chippewa has shown at times this year.
I understand, and I can completely see why it probably felt like someone was interjecting when it didn't feel pertinent. I only stated that they might have interpreted the discussion on Chippewa's lack of resiliency as the deciding component in the outcome. I didn't personally read it that way, but I try to assume the most innocent of circumstances whenever possible. So, if it was possible that the discussion was interpreted that way, I usually try to give the benefit of the doubt. Reading the post and its reply simply caught me off-guard because of this, but just as I assume the best of intentions from his interjection, I also try to assume the most innocent intentions in the reply. I'm sure you weren't trying to be belligerent. I'm just trying to assume the same to most people.
Wcal observer;1758474 wrote:I will say I disagree totally with your assumption he was asking a question. When you clearly state he witnessed an interaction ( one which he did not have the facts), and then says he takes out even more of his frustration on Twitter those are clear cut accusations. I challenge you, and anyone else to look at his account and tell me ONE instance where this took place? I only ask one, because there are NONE. That statement from Smithie is a fabrication, and defamation of character, not a question. If someone where to criticize my performance at work, I would be open to actual feedback based on facts. However, God help them if they wanted to fabricate information about me, or my performance. Many of us question, and argue over personnel decisions, play calling, and other strategies, but this is the first time someone has deliberately made false accusations about someone's character to the best if my knowledge. The only question stated was do you read his Twitter; after that it's nothing more than an attack on character. He finalizes it by saying I just thought this needed to be mentioned as we discuss sportsmanship. That is a far cry from just asking something.
You might be right. He might have been doing more than just asking. He started by noting the (alleged, as I haven't seen it) absence of well wishes for the two teams that have beat his. As for what else he has posted on Twitter, I can't be a judge of whether or not it's able to be interpreted as edgy or not. I haven't seen it. I barely get on Twitter anymore, anyway.
I can say this: I do hope he wasn't trying to stir the pot. I'd hate to think we have to devolve to that on here.