gut;1805479 wrote:For all the talk, I do think the scariest prospect of everything is Hillary stacking the SCOTUS with liberal judges.
If the modern day conservative politician were notably better, I'd completely agree. As it stands, I think the only advantage of keeping the SCOTUS near 50-50 is to allow for very little to get done, which is sad.
Belly35;1805488 wrote:Liar liar lair Really z4p NFL that the best you can come up with. Went the Sec. Of State does not know nor understand the code of Warrior Ethos of every military personal serving our country she is unfit to hold that position. She was and is unfit to hold such a position any position of political authority within our government. SEc.of State was assigned to her for political reason and not for the best interest of America. Is that the type of political mentality America wants to be continued. When truth is with held from the public, congress and the FBI there is only one reason the agenda of corruption is deep, long, wrong and profitable. That not something I want running my country. When you look at what the political system, career politicians and lawyer in Washington has provide as candidates to the American citizen this election something is wrong, and the career politician needs to be limitated from DC.
What we as citizen needs to look at is not so much the candidates but who they will surround themselves with and the qualification of those individuals to guide our country for the next 4 years. I've learned that it not what you know that makes you a leader but what individual surrounding you that gives you direction. Is the same path of incompendency we've had for the past 8 years what you want, with the same political agenda, corruption, career DC inept out of touch individual holding office that will effect your life, country and future.
Is Trump that leader I would want to running my country ..... 8 year of community organizer Obama, 4 years of (affirmative action) Hillary...
Good lord, Belly.
QuakerOats;1805498 wrote:It is unimaginable that anyone could support someone who has spent 4 decades leaching and stealing from taxpayers while at the same time lying and deceiving them at every turn, all for political expediency and personal enrichment (to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars).
Compare that to the alternative; someone who has spent 4 decades building up businesses, employing thousands of people, paying billions in employee wages and benefits, and contributing to society.
Honest to Christ it is mind boggling how flat out stupid some people must be.
The latter was raised on a silver spoon, was gift-wrapped his first CEO position, and has failed in most non-real estate business ventures where he's been actively involved. He's been noted as exploiting the abhorrent tax system for his own personal gain while his businesses go belly-up and all those people he was employing lose their jobs. Beyond that, he's continually bullied himself out of legally binding obligations by threatening financially overwhelming legal processes.
He's been corrupt, in short. He's a good businessman in the same way that Lance Armstrong is a good cyclist. He's not without a knack for it, but he's corrupt all the same.
You're dead on in your description of Clinton, however.
