O RLY?lhslep134;1743381 wrote:It's not drug related
A source told ESPN's Joe Schad that the suspensions were due to marijuana and academics.
O RLY?lhslep134;1743381 wrote:It's not drug related
A source told ESPN's Joe Schad that the suspensions were due to marijuana and academics.
My source said it was related to a summer job but he just said he heard wrong. Your initial guess was rightAutomatik;1743394 wrote:O RLY?
OMG you're so cool tell me more!!!DeyDurkie5;1743389 wrote:He just wanted someone to respond and say please tell us lshlep you are so smart!!
Dude it's called being a lawyer. He works in a zero sum field where you're either right or wrong. When you're wrong, he's not stopping the press until 1) you admit you're wrong or 2) it's so obviously apparent that an admission is unnecessary. he's clashed with a lot of people on here and he's had a lot of people agree with what he's saying. It's part of the package.Automatik;1743394 wrote:O RLY?
Why are you so worked up? I said I was wrong and you were rightAutomatik;1743402 wrote:Why respond like your "source" is fact when you nor them know 100%?
Who's worked up? Just trying to understand why you post like that with out being 100% you're correct.lhslep134;1743411 wrote:Why are you so worked up? I said I was wrong and you were right
Apparently, I must spread some reputation around before giving it to you again.j_crazy;1743410 wrote:Dude it's called being a lawyer. He works in a zero sum field where you're either right or wrong. When you're wrong, he's not stopping the press until 1) you admit you're wrong or 2) it's so obviously apparent that an admission is unnecessary. he's clashed with a lot of people on here and he's had a lot of people agree with what he's saying. It's part of the package.
He's admitted multiple times on here that he can be, and definitely has been, an arrogant prick. He owns up to the douchiness. But that doesn't take away from the validity of what he's saying about your Ohio State knowledge coming from a place of cluelessness.
Just trying to understand why you haven't moved on yet when I said I was wrong.Automatik;1743412 wrote:
Who's worked up? Just trying to understand why you post like that with out being 100% you're correct.
Tiernan;1743401 wrote:Why is Bosa hangin' with the Jamaicans in the first place?
Ok, deflection it is.lhslep134;1743417 wrote:Just trying to understand why you haven't moved on yet when I said I was wrong.
What are the words you're expecting me to type? I said I was wrong.Automatik;1743420 wrote:Ok, deflection it is.
We can move on now.
i believe the NCAA has rules against it. I'm not sure though.Tiernan;1743446 wrote:Question? Can Colorado & Washington players smoke weed without repercussions?
I was being facetious.Tiernan;1743443 wrote:Half!?! ...when the hell were you last on a college campus?
yeah I doubt the ncaa wants any athletes "taking" pot. Do they snort or shoot it usually?Automatik;1743462 wrote:I don't think that was a serious question, but yeah....legal or not the NCAA does not allow players to take pot.