I got 50-1 on USA when my sister was in Vegas in November. Can't believe it's down to 10-1.Laley23;1612559 wrote:Stupid Americans. I'm in Vegas right now and went to go place some money on USA in Brazil. Opened at 75-1 and are at 10-1. Unreal how much we have bet down the odds. Anyway, I didn't make a bet at 10-1, wasn't worth it.
I put $10 on The Netherlands at 18-1 though!
It's the television contracts that happen. It's different in different markets. NBC Sports Network paid a decent amount of money and shows maybe one game a week (Saturday or Sunday afternoons). Other than that, that's the only nationwide television deal.Ytowngirlinfla;1612507 wrote:Does anyone know why the MLS is barely on tv? How do they expect to grow the interest for this league when you get 1 game per week? We see more MLS games out here on the spanish channels then the American channels.
It's kinda annoying because we watch a lot of soccer, typically there are games on daily. We watch Liga MX, La Liga and Ligue 1. There are at least one of those leagues playing. Of course all in spanish but we are okay with that. MLS is expanding teams but doesn't have a major TV contract. Honestly it has come a long way but without a major TV deal this league won't grow in popularity which the league desperately needs.OSH;1612564 wrote:It's the television contracts that happen. It's different in different markets. NBC Sports Network paid a decent amount of money and shows maybe one game a week (Saturday or Sunday afternoons). Other than that, that's the only nationwide television deal.
Columbus Crew are on TWC Sports Network (or whatever the channel is called). That is a big deal since all Crew games are blacked out within 75 miles -- even if they are streamed through MLS website. Here in Kansas, all SKC games are on a local Kansas/Kansas City television channel. I believe Galaxy has a similar deal.
Unfortunately, it's what MLS is given. Early on, the league had to pay television to get televised. So, I'd say we've come a long way. Hopefully it'll continue to get better. There are definitely more advertisements for MLS on television. I guess to make it better is American soccer fans have to ensure they tune in to support the league whenever they can. Outside of idiot commentators (Lalas, Twellman), the broadcasts are typically good -- my only other complaint is the Americanized camera angles of zooming in all the time and also not showing the whole field. I watch most of the time, and when I can't, I DVR the games. I do agree that MLS will improve when the viewership (live and at home) gets better. Without the domestic support, the game will not grow as it should.
The NBCSN deal is/was considered a "major TV deal." The value of the contract and the exposure to more households -- way more than what was previously Fox Soccer Channel.Ytowngirlinfla;1612571 wrote:It's kinda annoying because we watch a lot of soccer, typically there are games on daily. We watch Liga MX, La Liga and Ligue 1. There are at least one of those leagues playing. Of course all in spanish but we are okay with that. MLS is expanding teams but doesn't have a major TV contract. Honestly it has come a long way but without a major TV deal this league won't grow in popularity which the league desperately needs.
was a card given to either?OSH;1613427 wrote:There has to be discipline for this:
No the ref for the game sucked balls. Not sure how the hell you miss that. I would expect him to get suspended 3 to 5 games for that.Sonofanump;1613445 wrote:was a card given to either?
Adnan Januzaj getting stamped.SportsAndLady;1613442 wrote:^pics not working, what is it
