Tiernan;1548727 wrote:Let Knight Ryder keep running his mouth...will be soooo much sweeter when we shut him up.

i dont think what will be any time soon.

lhslep134;1548451 wrote:Doubtful. FSU is the biggest fraud in the country. Don't be surprised if Duke wins by 14+

i guess we found out who the fraud was tonite. Duke by 14 , you should be banned for stupidity alone

As expected, this isn't over.

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/family-jameis-winston-accuser-hold-press-conference-friday-211245528--ncaaf.html

Yeah that family sees dollar signs...and seemingly are willingly pimping out their daughter more.

Could be the first time the Heisman was taken back the same night it was given-lol.

My master plan is shaping up nicely...Bwahahahaha

Manhattan Buckeye;1551835 wrote:Yeah that family sees dollar signs...and seemingly are willingly pimping out their daughter more.

Or they want justice for a complete botching of a rape investigation.

se-alum;1551949 wrote:Or they want justice for a complete botching of a rape investigation.

I've seen no evidence of a "complete botching" of anything. An investigation can be done correctly, and sometimes no crime is found.

queencitybuckeye;1551953 wrote:I've seen no evidence of a "complete botching" of anything. An investigation can be done correctly, and sometimes no crime is found.

So you know all of the facts?

queencitybuckeye;1551953 wrote:I've seen no evidence of a "complete botching" of anything. An investigation can be done correctly, and sometimes no crime is found.

Yea, I reckon waiting 10 months to question people about a reported rape is standard operating procedure. Winston was identified in January, but never even questioned until Meggs took over the case a month ago. DNA was just taken and confirmed. However, you should probably call the family and inform them of your findings, they will probably cancel the press conference.

SportsAndLady;1551958 wrote:So you know all of the facts?

No, nor does anyone else in this thread. The difference is that not knowing all of the facts should lead one to conclude they don't know what happened. It does me. Others seem to not let that stop them from deciding they know the truth.

queencitybuckeye;1551969 wrote:No, nor does anyone else in this thread. The difference is that not knowing all of the facts should lead one to conclude they don't know what happened. It does me. Others seem to not let that stop them from deciding they know the truth.

Not everyone in this thread is making a conclusion on whether or not he's innocent or guilty.

To think, however, that he 100% didn't sexually assault the woman because nothing was criminally charged though..