Ohio State @ Illinoise, Wooden Turtles Version

College Sports 216 replies 2,542 views
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Nov 16, 2013 7:33pm
wildcats20;1537022 wrote:This.

OSU needs someone to lose. And it's most likely not happening.
'Bama gets beat in the Iron Bowl...bank it ;)
wildcats20's avatar
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Nov 16, 2013 7:34pm
vball10set;1537023 wrote:'Bama gets beat in the Iron Bowl...bank it ;)
I didn't want to say it, but I think I agree.
SportsAndLady's avatar
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Nov 16, 2013 7:44pm
Yeah..no way Bama goes into Auburn and wins
Pick6's avatar
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Nov 16, 2013 7:51pm
Well it took a miracle to beat UGA at home, so I dont see how that means Bama wont win, but I hope it happens.
se-alum's avatar
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Nov 17, 2013 2:32am
believer;1536911 wrote:I've said since the beginning of the season that the "perfect storm" was brewing. All of the "we deserve a shot at the NC simply because we're THE Ohio State and have won a bazillion straight under Urban" types kept telling me to STFU and, amazingly enough, still are. You remind me of Obama nut huggers.

Fact is Ohio State will be fortunate to make the Rose Bowl let alone hope they have a shot at actually winning it. I'm not too sure Ohio State can even win the B1G championship right now unless the defense gets its heads out of their collective asses. Piss poor performance IM Bobcats suck HO.

Speaking of SUCKS, Roby sucks. And you excuse makers out there can spare me "the defensive secondary was at a disadvantage because Grant & Perry were out" crap. Buckeyes should have won this 56-0 easily even without the secondary being intact. Instead the D allowed a shitty, mediocre Illini team to hang.

Is that annoying enough?
LOL...this guy just making shit up. Nobody is making excuses for Roby, and how many Buckeye fans on here have actually said they would make and/or win the NCG?? We've discussed what needs to happen to make the NCG game, but I'm not sure anyone(outside of sleeper) has sat here and said they deserve to be in the NCG.
Heretic's avatar
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Nov 17, 2013 10:43am
believer;1536911 wrote:I've said since the beginning of the season that the "perfect storm" was brewing. All of the "we deserve a shot at the NC simply because we're THE Ohio State and have won a bazillion straight under Urban" types kept telling me to STFU and, amazingly enough, still are. You remind me of Obama nut huggers.

Fact is Ohio State will be fortunate to make the Rose Bowl let alone hope they have a shot at actually winning it. I'm not too sure Ohio State can even win the B1G championship right now unless the defense gets its heads out of their collective asses. Piss poor performance IM Bobcats suck HO.

Speaking of SUCKS, Roby sucks. And you excuse makers out there can spare me "the defensive secondary was at a disadvantage because Grant & Perry were out" crap. Buckeyes should have won this 56-0 easily even without the secondary being intact. Instead the D allowed a shitty, mediocre Illini team to hang.

Is that annoying enough?
This whole post just screams "DERP!". From the forced (and painfully stupid) political analogy to start out with to the complete "chicken little" thing about how they'll be lucky to make the Rose Bowl (apparently I've been missing out on how MSU is a completely dominant dynamo who'd be favored against, well, everyone not named Notre Dame, I guess...).

It all screams of the frustration of not really being able to troll during two games won by a combined score of 119-14, so jumping wildly on the first opportunity...regardless of how poorly thought out any of it is.


As for stuff that actually has importance, as opposed to a guy who seems desperate to rival Sleeper in the "no logic whatsoever" category...what's the word on Boza? Too lazy to read an entire thread for information, but the defense really went down the shitter as soon as he left (from bend w/o breaking to just fuckin' broke).
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Nov 17, 2013 10:56am
The defense wasn't that awful either. Illinois had 5.8 yards per attempt and 3.5 yards per carry. The backup linebackers were just getting sucked in on fakes and not allowing the D to get off the field. Not to mention it looks like the team was packed up ready to go home in the 1st quarter. Every time they showed the sidelines the whole team just looked so uninterested.
SportsAndLady's avatar
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Nov 17, 2013 10:58am
LJ;1537223 wrote:The defense wasn't that awful either. Illinois had 5.8 yards per attempt and 3.5 yards per carry. The backup linebackers were just getting sucked in on fakes and not allowing the D to get off the field. Not to mention it looks like the team was packed up ready to go home in the 1st quarter. Every time they showed the sidelines the whole team just looked so uninterested.
Lol
Pick6's avatar
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Nov 17, 2013 11:00am
whose fault is it the team was "uninterested"?
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Nov 17, 2013 11:04am
Pick6;1537230 wrote:whose fault is it the team was "uninterested"?
Dunno, I'm not in the Locker room. Could be coaches, could be players themselves just being overconfident and thinking they can walk through the game. Probably a combo of some coaches joking around about Illinois during the week combined with the perception the players already had.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Nov 17, 2013 11:05am
SportsAndLady;1537226 wrote:Lol
Dynamite response. Your football expertise is highly valued on this forum.
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Nov 17, 2013 4:26pm
As it is on the NFL threads as well...
SportsAndLady's avatar
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Nov 17, 2013 7:12pm
LJ;1537234 wrote:Dynamite response. Your football expertise is highly valued on this forum.
You're delusional when it comes to Fickell and this defense. It's not even worth discussing with you. So I just Lol'd.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Nov 17, 2013 7:19pm
SportsAndLady;1537635 wrote:You're delusional when it comes to Fickell and this defense. It's not even worth discussing with you. So I just Lol'd.
No, I'm just not a chicken little. You on the other hand, shouldn't be discussing anything having to do with defense other than "daggone they put up 35 points!!!!"
SportsAndLady's avatar
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Nov 17, 2013 7:25pm
LJ;1537640 wrote:No, I'm just not a chicken little. You on the other hand, shouldn't be discussing anything having to do with defense other than "daggone they put up 35 points!!!!"
Lol okay LJ
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Nov 17, 2013 7:28pm
SportsAndLady;1537644 wrote:Lol okay LJ
Tell me, what position is the viper and what are his main responsibilities and his secondary responsibilities?
SportsAndLady's avatar
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Nov 17, 2013 7:29pm
LJ;1537646 wrote:Tell me, what position is the viper and what are his main responsibilities and his secondary responsibilities?
You're just soooo knowledgeable about football. How can I compete with your superior football knowledge?
Mohican00's avatar
Mohican00
Posts: 3,394
Nov 17, 2013 7:49pm
LJ;1537646 wrote:Tell me, what position is the viper and what are his main responsibilities and his secondary responsibilities?
but that's not something 99% of football fans know - in fact, just googling "viper, football position, secondary" or any sort of combination brings up (from a brief glance) mostly tOSU sites. Will/Mike/Sam is one thing, Viper seems a bit more like trivia
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Nov 17, 2013 7:56pm
Mohican00;1537654 wrote:but that's not something 99% of football fans know - in fact, just googling "viper, football position, secondary" or any sort of combination brings up (from a brief glance) mostly tOSU sites. Will/Mike/Sam is one thing, Viper seems a bit more like trivia
He says all I'm doing is being a Fickell apologist when he has made it clear multiple times that he doesn't even know what he is talking about. Anyone who knows anything about OSU football would know what and who the Viper is, and that he is awful in coverage when taking the TE in man coverage.
Pick6's avatar
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Nov 17, 2013 7:59pm
Viper is the name OSU uses for the Leo position. no difference.
Automatik's avatar
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Nov 17, 2013 8:04pm
LJ;1537659 wrote:Anyone who knows anything about OSU football would know what and who the Viper is, and that he is awful in coverage when taking the TE in man coverage.
Or anyone who regularly reads 11W.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Nov 17, 2013 8:05pm
Good lord, LJ, give this superiority complex shit a rest. We get it, you know everything there is to know about Ohio State football, so why even have OSU threads? I got it--maybe you should just start a blog we can all follow!!!
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Nov 17, 2013 8:08pm
Automatik;1537662 wrote:Or anyone who regularly reads 11W.
Every OSU beat writer went over the viper vs Leo name months ago. OSU defenses have used a LEO for years.
SportsAndLady's avatar
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Nov 17, 2013 8:30pm
Who gives a fuck about vipers, mike Sam will, 11w

You're a fucking retard if you defend this defense. It's HORRIBLE. And I don't need to know what a viper is to see that.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Nov 17, 2013 8:31pm
vball10set;1537663 wrote:Good lord, LJ, give this superiority complex shit a rest. We get it, you know everything there is to know about Ohio State football, so why even have OSU threads? I got it--maybe you should just start a blog we can all follow!!!
OK retard.
Go post more toledo links that no one cares about and links to week old stories