Ah fuck, only 2:1. That's bullshit, adding 7 points to a line only pays 2:1? Fuck I don't even know why I made that bet now lol

SportsAndLady;1663316 wrote:Bet SF -10.5 tonight

They're up 10 and decide to go for 4th and goal at the 1 and get stuffed.

About right for me so far this year

-10.5??

Nevermind. Wasn't at the last page.

You got lucky. Nobody to blame but yourself messing around with alt lines if you lose.

Hey...I am struggling to win...let me make it harder for myself with an alternate spread bet.

Glad you won though.

TBone14;1663434 wrote:-10.5??

Nevermind. Wasn't at the last page.

You got lucky. Nobody to blame but yourself messing around with alt lines if you lose.

Hey...I am struggling to win...let me make it harder for myself with an alternate spread bet.

Glad you won though.

Haha the thrill of even money isn't good enough for me. I need a better return. And when you know the niners will crush the Rams, that's a good time to do it.

SportsAndLady;1663450 wrote:Haha the thrill of even money isn't good enough for me. I need a better return. And when you know the niners will crush the Rams, that's a good time to do it.

All it took was the worst Offensive PI call in the history of tackle football to swing the momentum, a blown coverage 80 yard TD with 13 seconds left in the half and a backdoor pick 6. Crushed em.

I got so lucky last night... I laid $50 on the over. When Vernon Davis fucked over McDonald from catching an easy TD and then they couldn't get in from the 1 I figured I had lost. Thankfully things always come in 3's so there was another pick 6 on the day for a cover. I also lost $15 on SF -2.5 in the 1st half.

I'm taking the Pats on Thursday.

TBone14;1663454 wrote:All it took was the worst Offensive PI call in the history of tackle football to swing the momentum, a blown coverage 80 yard TD with 13 seconds left in the half and a backdoor pick 6. Crushed em.

14 point win in the NFL is crushing. I was right wasn't I?

Lol, glad your streak is over, but don't act like you were anything but lucky last night.

So I got a $250 free bet from an offshore book that I used to use extensively. It's not a free play, it is one, $250 wager. And those choose what you bet on and it is a prop.

So I have to bet on which team will call a timeout first tonight.

My initial thought was the Broncos. Peyton is more apt to use a TO if he doesn't like the look of the defense in the 1st half than the 2nd half. But their offense has been humming and if they are in rhythm, he probably won't have the need to. I think I am going Chargers on it. Between potential crowd noise and Rivers wanting to use the whole play clock, he might run out of time and have to burn one.

Also, it appears these guys take Mastercard. I thought somebody on here was looking for a book that took MC at one point.

That was me. What's the site??

You can't analyze which team will call a timeout first lol purely a guess

DeyDurkie5;1666052 wrote:That was me. What's the site??

BetUS

www.betus.com.pa

Tell them you were referred by Tyler. Account 287084. We should both get a bonus. For what it is worth, I have cashed out with them in past. They sent a check FedEx. From the time I cashed out on the site, I had the check in my hands in 7 days, which is reasonable to me. I haven't used them in probably 4 years but they sent the free bet so I'm definitely going to try to take advantage of that.

SportsAndLady;1666057 wrote:You can't analyze which team will call a timeout first lol purely a guess

I would agree but it is fun to try to figure out if there is an edge. If you look at the factors that go into burning a timeout early in the game, I think there could be a slight advantage to the Chargers just based on crowd noise. If Rivers is trying to change a play at the line and the crowd is rowdy, he may have to burn one. Peyton won't have to deal with that. Other than that...it is probably dead even.

They said they can't issue an account to my jurisdiction. Fuck your site tbone lol

DeyDurkie5;1666115 wrote:They said they can't issue an account to my jurisdiction. Fuck your site tbone lol

That blows. Sorry for the tease. Where is your jurisdiction? WTF does that even mean?

Ive had trouble in the past getting a deposit to be allowed because my CC was through my bank.

If I tried to run my card and the deposit didn't go through I always asked the place where they are based out of. Costa Rica, Caymens, Antigua..etc.

Then I call the number on the back of my card and tell them I am trying to make a purchase in Costa Rica for X amount and to let it go through. Then you can usually get it through. They usually don't know it is for gaming. Tell em you are on vacation.

It wasn't even my card. It was me setting up my account name and info. Didn't even get to see if I could use my mastercard

Not looking good for my 2 bets... Broncos -6.5 in the first half and over 52 for the game.

This play after the 2 minute warning will decide my 250 timeout bet.

If the Broncos get 1st down...they will easily call timeout on the drive

If not...2 minute drive for Rivers. Big play.

Iliketurtles;1666199 wrote:Not looking good for my 2 bets... Broncos -6.5 in the first half and over 52 for the game.

Over still looks bad. But gonna hit the Broncos probably.

Laley23;1666206 wrote:Over still looks bad. But gonna hit the Broncos probably.

Yeah I only have 20 on each. Just gotta hope broncos don't give up any points here.

MOAR points in the 2nd half!

Iliketurtles;1666212 wrote:MOAR points in the 2nd half!

Yes

Adjusted the over to 61.5 lol

SportsAndLady;1666215 wrote:Yes

Adjusted the over to 61.5 lol

Lol Jesus man why. I hated taking the over at 52 couldn't imagine moving it up 10 more points. How much did that change the line?

Iliketurtles;1666225 wrote:Lol Jesus man why. I hated taking the over at 52 couldn't imagine moving it up 10 more points. How much did that change the line?

I only put $10 on it. I would win $27

Fuck it lol

SportsAndLady;1666228 wrote:I only put $10 on it. I would win $27

Fuck it lol

Haha not bad I mean with your luck you gotta try anything.