Along the lines of what we have been talking about, here is Paul Hoynes take on this very subject from a column 3 days ago.
Hey, Hoynsie: So far this off-season seems a lot like two years ago when the "bottom feeding" ownership brought the likes of Casey Kotchman, Jack Hannahan, Shelly Duncan, Jose Lopez, et al to the team. They did all that after making a big splash by trading for Ubaldo Jimenez the summer before. Last off-season, Tribe fans were pleasantly surprised at the free agent signings of
Nick Swisher and Michael Bourn. Even Mark Reynolds and Brett Meyers, who didn't pan out, showed fans that management was serious. Is this off-season another "pause" where management doesn't follow up on what it started by spending the necessary dollars to acquire top talent?
– Keith Von Zup, Tannersville, Pa.
Hey, Keith: As you noted, the Indians were aware of the increased TV money coming their way this year and spent a large part of it in advance by signing Swisher, Bourn, Myers and Reynolds. Still, based on last year’s success, I thought it was important to continue to be aggressive on the free-agent market this winter to overtake Detroit and hold off Kansas City in the AL Central. I liked the David Murphy signing, but I expected them to do more.
Instead, the Indians are saying the current roster – particularly Swisher, Bourn, Murphy and Asdrubal Cabrera – can provide a spark with better performances.
I have heard the Indians use that reasoning before and I don’t remember being overwhelmed by the results.
The bolding is mine, but I think that last sentence hits the nail on the head.
Almost everything went right last season and we played unworldly well against the league bottom feeders and got killed by the good teams.
We arguably are fielding a team with less talent this season as we had no real additions in the off-season and some big departures.
If we were getting thumped by the good teams last year, how are we supposed to close the gap by subtracting instead of adding to what we had?
A fast start is going to be imperative I think because if they get out slow. then talk will start to shift to whether or not you move Masterson while you can get something for him, and that would be a disaster given the team's history with that kind of thing. The fans just aren't going to go for it.
We also have zero pitching depth right now if we suddenly get a rash of injuries or dead arms. Salazar a major candidate for that, having never thrown more than 107 innings on any level in a season.
It has just been a wasted opportunity to create some buzz at a time when the city is itching to latch on to a winning team. Adding a piece or 2 would have gone a long way in the off-season to convincing a skeptical fan base that they are serious about actually contending.