Michigan State should be top 5 after today.rydawg5;1541771 wrote:Will Michigan St jump Oregon and Stanford after this?
No, top 10. I'd still take Auburn, Stanford, Mizzou, and Clemson over MSU.sleeper;1541801 wrote:Michigan State should be top 5 after today.
They've lost 1 game.ptown_trojans_1;1541803 wrote:No, top 10. I'd still take Auburn, Stanford, Mizzou, and Clemson over MSU.
Stanford has looked better better and has the better win over MSU.sleeper;1541804 wrote:They've lost 1 game.
You do know they have lost to Utah and USC, right?ptown_trojans_1;1541812 wrote:Stanford has looked better better and has the better win over MSU.
Correct.wildcats20;1541813 wrote:You do know they have lost to Utah and USC, right?
I know MSU didn't lose to a 4-7 Utah team who is winless in the Pac12 besides their win over Stanford.ptown_trojans_1;1541816 wrote:Correct.
But, honestly who has MSU played that merits them to jump Stanford?
Stanford has 4 wins over ranked teams.
Fresno State hasn't lose to Notre Dame. Should they be ahead of Michigan State?Fly4Fun;1541818 wrote:I know MSU didn't lose to a 4-7 Utah team who is winless in the Pac12 besides their win over Stanford.
Stanford has beaten 5 ranked teams, 3 in the top 15, including 3 straight over ranked teams. MSU can't say that.Fly4Fun;1541818 wrote:I know MSU didn't lose to a 4-7 Utah team who is winless in the Pac12 besides their win over Stanford.
Swing and a miss.Mulva;1541819 wrote:Fresno State hasn't lose to Notre Dame. Should they be ahead of Michigan State?
Record of MSU lossesptown_trojans_1;1541820 wrote:Stanford has beaten 4 ranked teams, 2 in the top 15, MSU can't say that.
Rankings are bullshit anyway. Florida was ranked in the top 25 for most of the season and they just lost to an FCS school. LOLptown_trojans_1;1541820 wrote:Stanford has beaten 5 ranked teams, 3 in the top 15, MSU can't say that.
Let me go ahead and just tweak the F4F sentence.LJ;1541821 wrote:Swing and a miss.
And in case you didn't catch it, my point was how stupid that argument was to say MSU should be ahead of Stanford. I'm in no way saying Fresno State should be ahead of MSU.LJ;1541821 wrote:Swing and a miss.
I understand ya, but just am saying Stanford's overall and best is better than MSU has this year. As in, Stanford's good trumps MSU's.LJ;1541822 wrote:Record of MSU losses
8-3
Record of Stanford losses 12-10
# of MSU losses 1
# of Stanford losses 2
Stanford is more beatable than MSU
MSU should be ranked above Stanford.
thispmoney25;1541836 wrote:None of it matters, Rose Bowl bound.
When you're undefeated, the championship is all that matters. If it isn't, you're doing it wrong.believer;1541839 wrote:this
And it's not a bad gig.
Agreed.pmoney25;1541836 wrote:None of it matters, Rose Bowl bound.
But, if the 2 teams ahead of you are better, it doesn't matter.Mulva;1541840 wrote:When you're undefeated, the championship is all that matters. If it isn't, you're doing it wrong.
It doesn't matter.ptown_trojans_1;1541842 wrote:But, if the 2 teams ahead of you are better, it doesn't matter.
Probably a minority opinion but Florida State is not better than Ohio State. They're good but I'm not buying the Kool aid.ptown_trojans_1;1541842 wrote:But, if the 2 teams ahead of you are better, it doesn't matter.