Automatik;1540295 wrote:I haven't really kept up much on the story, but someone from the media originally brought this story back from the dead? The accuser didn't wish to pursue? The case went inactive. Was the possible cover up the reasoning for bringing it back?

Automatik;1540295 wrote:I haven't really kept up much on the story, but someone from the media originally brought this story back from the dead? The accuser didn't wish to pursue? The case went inactive. Was the possible cover up the reasoning for bringing it back?

SportsAndLady;1540314 wrote:Read vballs link from above

Automatik;1540295 wrote:I haven't really kept up much on the story, but someone from the media originally brought this story back from the dead? The accuser didn't wish to pursue? The case went inactive. Was the possible cover up the reasoning for bringing it back?

vball10set;1540180 wrote:They're as good as UT, but not NIU...not even close.

SportsAndLady;1540273 wrote:Doubt there is a charge

These things kinda just go away

Automatik;1540630 wrote:

One of the affidavits is from the accuser’s roommate and the other is from another football player, both of whom were present (happened at HER apartment, not a bar, not a party, not JWs place). That both confirm that they had an ongoing relationship. That there are photos of the two of them together taken before AND after the initial allegation. That roommate claims she was pissed at JW for some reason that night and decided to claim rape. (perhaps because he told her his real GF was coming in town that day and to lay low). That she changed her mind after the call but before the cops got there but didn’t want to tell them she made it up. (thus the “unidentified” rapist…intentionally fabricated description) That when she later was pressed, she identified JW and was questioned about her inconsistent statements and evidence of a consensual relationship and realized she better drop it. That when the accuser met with Meggs on Tuesday, she reaffirmed that she did not want to press charges. That every bit of evidence collected points to consensual sex and there is no way charges will be brought. That TPD and SAO are only trying to figure out how to clear JW without exposing/humiliating the accuser.
Also, that JW informed Jimbo about it in DECEMBER of last year after he heard of the call to the cops and told him EVERYTHING (thus JF’s continued faith in JW).
Assuming any of this is correct (not that there is any proof of any of it) JW, JF and Jansens confidence is not surprising.
Based on what we know now, if there are no charges by Friday, and if JW is suited up on Saturday, you can bet that there will not be any. And whoever is responsible for leaking this is certainly going to get “raked over the coals”.

Automatik;1540686 wrote:I think keeping quiet is the smart thing to do. The media brought this case to light, correct? It was "inactive."

Some more randomness from another forum...

Automatik;1540630 wrote:

Automatik;1540737 wrote:Link?

Automatik;1540686 wrote:I think keeping quiet is the smart thing to do. The media brought this case to light, correct? It was "inactive."

Some more randomness from another forum...

sleeper;1540700 wrote:Women. Can't trust them and part of the reason why there is this "rape culture". It's not always rape, its usually just a woman who either felt bad about the hookup after the fact or uses the hookup to play games. That's the problem with rape; its not always cut and dry.