Manhattan Buckeye;1463810 wrote:Yeah, that is why it worked. All of the other stuff (spoilers, photos, etc.)...I get the evil red box.

vball10set;1463817 wrote:But you didn't use it in post #328, and that's why Goon responded as he did in #329

justincredible;1463808 wrote:Indeed. Things were so much simpler when it was just the two of us. That was a good 15 minutes.

LJ;1463814 wrote:TWSS

Manhattan Buckeye;1463822 wrote:Partial quote, not a complete one. Again, red box.

justincredible;1463800 wrote:It appears that there is little chance that I won't have an agenda against a certain poster if Fly is voted out, according to said poster. Further points out the "no win" situation I'm in, always. Oh well.

like_that;1463831 wrote:Who said this?

ohiobucks1;1463818 wrote:I call for Democratic Impeachment of Mods. 4 times a year, Mods should be voted on. If a mod gets over 70% bad marks, he/she should be removed and replaced. Freedom for all.

Rotinaj;1463837 wrote:Not a bad idea. Or something like every 6 months make a poll with the names of all mods and whoever gets the least amount of votes gets the boot. Give everyone 2 votes or something. Change we can believe in!

Rotinaj;1463837 wrote:Not a bad idea. Or something like every 6 months make a poll with the names of all mods and whoever gets the least amount of votes gets the boot. Give everyone 2 votes or something. Change we can believe in!

Rotinaj;1463837 wrote:Not a bad idea. Or something like every 6 months make a poll with the names of all mods and whoever gets the least amount of votes gets the boot. Give everyone 2 votes or something. Change we can believe in!

queencitybuckeye;1463844 wrote:Not sure why the owner of a private enterprise would turn over the running of it to the "customers".

Laley23;1463845 wrote:I
like the idea, but I wouldnt say lowest gets the boot. That will work for awhile, but eventually you might be replacing a good mod with a shit one because you only have good mods left. It should be like congress, a certain number is needed to stay (or on the flip, to get the boot).

SportsAndLady;1463833 wrote:Better yet.. What does that post even mean lol holy double negatives

like_that;1463831 wrote:Who said this?

SportsAndLady;1463847 wrote:Lol @ calling this a private enterprise. I mean yeah it's technically true. But forums' success depends on the posters. Why not keep the posters happy by allowing them to vote on the mods they feel aren't doing their job?

queencitybuckeye;1463844 wrote:Not sure why the owner of a private enterprise would turn over the running of it to the "customers".

justincredible;1463800 wrote:It appears that there is little chance that I won't have an agenda against a certain poster if Fly is voted out, according to said poster. Further points out the "no win" situation I'm in, always. Oh well.

GOONx19;1463726 wrote:Okay, F4F, he read too much into it. Regardless, you haven't really helped your reputation with this thread. A few people have even said they now understand what the complaining is about. I just don't want to see this site lose any more posters, because when there's only 50 active posters every one counts. I personally love what the OC offers. A good mix of sports and bullshit, and it's way easier for me to keep up to date on current events by just scrolling through the front page than to find it elsewhere. But when people start leaving, the impact is exponential.

justincredible;1463808 wrote:Indeed. Things were so much simpler when it was just the two of us. That was a good 15 minutes.

justincredible;1463860 wrote:I am going to put my pwnership of the site up for a vote.