38th huh? That's a hell of a lot better than I would have guessed.dtdtim wrote:I was not the one making the original point, I was just asking a question in response to your response. I also do not think Notre Dame is irrelevant. I'm not a fan and I'm not a hater, I'm just calling a spade a spade.athlete37 wrote: And we've had more ten wins seasons lately than you'd think. I doubt as many BCS schools as you'd think have had 2 ten win regular seasons and a couple nine win regular seasons this decade
I found this info out in 5 minutes:
Since 2000:
Alabama has had 4 10+ win seasons.
Auburn has had 2 10+ win seasons and 3 9-win seasons.
Boston College has had 2 10+ win seasons and 4 9-win seasons.
Florida has had 5 10+ win seasons and 2 9 win seasons.
Florida State has 2 10+ win seasons and 3 9 win seasons.
Georgia has had 6 10+ win seasons and 1 9 win season.
Iowa has had 4 10+ win seasons and 1 9 win season.
LSU had had 4 10+ win seasons and 2 9 win seasons.
Louisville has had 3 10+ win seasons and 3 9 win seasons.
Maryland has had 4 and 1.
Miami (FL) has had 4 and 3.
Michigan has had 3 and 3.
Nebraska has had 3 and 3.
Ohio State has had 7 10+ win seasons.
Oklahoma has had 8.
Oregon has had 5 and 1.
Penn State has had 3 and 4.
USC has had 7 10+ win seasons.
Tennessee has had 4 and 1.
Texas has had 9 and 1.
Virginia Tech has had 7.
West Virginia has had 3 and 2.
Wisconsin has had 2 and 4.
What is your definition of 'not as many as you'd think'? I figured there were maybe 12-15 schools that could post a better decade end result to Notre Dame. This is 23. The list would grow longer if you added schools like BYU, Utah, Boise, and TCU.
From 2000-2008, Notre Dame sits squarely at a tie for 38th place in win percentage with Pitt. There are 8 mid-majors ahead of them.
The point? Notre Dame is far from irrelevant. But I wouldn't go so far as to say there are many other teams envious of their success during the 2000s.
Hamp89
Senior Member
H
625
posts
H
Hamp89
625 posts
Dec 25, 2009 7:17am