Oh, look who shows up.like_that;1440402 wrote:I would probably say the same thing if I had nothing.
Nah, really though, I dont care. COA is basically arguing with himself.
Oh, look who shows up.like_that;1440402 wrote:I would probably say the same thing if I had nothing.
That's why you called me a dumbercrat right? Yeah clearly don't care. :rolleyes:Pick6;1440405 wrote:Oh, look who shows up.
Nah, really though, I dont care. COA is basically arguing with himself.
:thumbup:Pick6;1440398 wrote:tl; dr. Nobody care. Nobody asked.
Not butthurt at all. Its obvious you are the one thats butthurt, writing a couple hundred word responses when nobody even gives a shit. Wish I had that time, but hey, Im not a fat ass who spends all day being a dick head on a forum because I have nothing better to do with my life.Commander of Awesome;1440409 wrote:That's why you called me a dumbercrat right? Yeah clearly don't care. :rolleyes:
I'd be butthurt if I just pwnsterized like that too. Keep trying babyface.
Keep QQing bc you got pwned for running your mouth about shit you knew nothing about. It's hilarious.Pick6;1440432 wrote:Not butthurt at all. Its obvious you are the one thats butthurt, writing a couple hundred word responses when nobody even gives a shit. Wish I had that time, but hey, Im not a fat ass who spends all day being a dick head on a forum because I have nothing better to do with my life.
I didnt get "pwned" on anything. But if "pwning" on the internet gets your dick hard at night, think whatever you'd like, "big guy".Commander of Awesome;1440436 wrote:Keep QQing bc you got pwned for running your mouth about shit you knew nothing about. It's hilarious.
Oh, but I'm sorry. Forgot you don't care :rolleyes:
You're still talking about this? LOL, yeah dont care at all. We get it little guy.Pick6;1440481 wrote:I didnt get "pwned" on anything. But if "pwning" on the internet gets your dick hard at night, think whatever you'd like, "big guy".
:thumbdown:O-Trap;1440581 wrote:Most dietary changes that seem to have realistic levels of success all seem to have one thing in common: a lowering of carbohydrate intake. Inasmuch as the paleo diet does this, it may indeed be successful, but the initial article makes a good point that the foundation of it assumes that our ancestors essentially had a completely developed dietary system in place, given their surroundings.
If that could be substantiated, even then, there wouldn't necessarily be anything proven about its health benefits being based on that fact, but since that fact cannot be substantiated, it's moot.
It should be worth noting that it isn't inherently a worthless diet. Its quality simply isn't substantiated beyond any skepticism.
So sorry to disappoint, but there are substantiated facts that do corroborate that at least two elements of the paleo diet are healthy. The fact that it is "paleo" is not proven to be one of them, but lower carbohydrate intake and emphasis on non-processed foods both are. Those aren't exclusive to paleo, though.sleeper;1440635 wrote::thumbdown:
:thumbup:O-Trap;1440637 wrote:So sorry to disappoint, but there are substantiated facts that do corroborate that at least two elements of the paleo diet are healthy. The fact that it is "paleo" is not proven to be one of them, but lower carbohydrate intake and emphasis on non-processed foods both are. Those aren't exclusive to paleo, though.