I don't know. I haven't been able to find a good account of that shootout. Assuming it lasted 10 minutes, I'd agree with you that plenty of back-up should have gotten there. But I don't know that he was surrounded (not sure how they'd set-up to avoid cross-fire) and I don't know how many pursued him (and there were unexploded IED's left behind probably slowed them).Mulva;1430735 wrote: Even in a normal situation I would find no backup arriving after 10 minutes troubling so close to a major city. This shortly after a major terrorist incident is pretty inexcusable. And assuming it did show up then letting him get away is equally inexcusable.
I said earlier in the thread that it didn't seem unreasonable that they could lose him among the houses. He's heavily armed and you have civilians to be concerned with, so they aren't following him blindly in aggressive pursuit in between the houses. He knows the neighborhood so I'm not surprised at all he was able to put some distance between himself.
As for lifting the lockdown, I'm not sure how it's really any more dangerous. If he was conscious and armed there was never anything preventing him from raiding a home. It's not like everyone was going to go congregate in a big group, and in fact they still urged people to remain indoors.
You don't typically lock everyone down for an armed and dangerous suspect. I think that was as much to make the cops job easier as anything, and because they weren't sure if there were unexploded IED's scattered around. They swept the area, they don't know where he is, I'm not sure why a continued lockdown would have been justified.
