EhFly4Fun;1400341 wrote:You're really reaching. I can't help how you interpret my post. But at no point did I actually insult you or demean you. People can have a discussion and different opinions without ending up in hostile positions towards each other.
I used "eh" as a casual interjection signifying a questioning of what you said. Basically I didn't agree with your line of reasoning about protection of our children. Your post sarcastically indicates the onus is only on the government:
That suggests because the government is trying to protect students in regards to one subject matter and location that they are obligated and must protect children in all areas including viewing material while under the control and supervision of their own parents.
I was merely questioning that sentiment and subsequently sharing the idea that parenting should be more involved in actually shaping their children's lives if they feel something is inappropriate for them to view. I wasn't faulting you for letting your children watch ABC family. I was pointing out that if after watching it, you deem the material to be inappropriate, there are steps to be taken to remedy the situation.
But if you want to base an entire hissy fit over an interjection that merely signifies a questioning tone similar "huh" then that's your prerogative.
And as far as me being "off-topic." I was simply responding to a post that was relevant in the thread.
ernest_t_bass
12th Son of the Lama
24,984
posts
ernest_t_bass
12th Son of the Lama
24,984
posts
Tue, Mar 5, 2013 10:14 AM
Mar 5, 2013 10:14 AM
Mar 5, 2013 10:14am
