ernest_t_bass;1400285 wrote:Because what I posted didn't warrant your pretentious response. This isn't a thread about parenting in relation to TV. If you'd like to start a thread about that, please go ahead and do so.
Back to the topic... I had coffee for breakfast.
You're really reaching. I can't help how you interpret my post. But at no point did I actually insult you or demean you. People can have a discussion and different opinions without ending up in hostile positions towards each other.
I used "eh" as a casual interjection signifying a questioning of what you said. Basically I didn't agree with your line of reasoning about protection of our children. Your post sarcastically indicates the onus is only on the government:
ernest_t_bass;1399883 wrote:What cracks me up about this, and the "protection" of our children... This is wrong, but send them home to sex-filled TV?
That suggests because the government is trying to protect students in regards to one subject matter and location that they are obligated and must protect children in all areas including viewing material while under the control and supervision of their own parents.
I was merely questioning that sentiment and subsequently sharing the idea that parenting should be more involved in actually shaping their children's lives if they feel something is inappropriate for them to view. I wasn't faulting you for letting your children watch ABC family. I was pointing out that if after watching it, you deem the material to be inappropriate, there are steps to be taken to remedy the situation.
But if you want to base an entire hissy fit over an interjection that merely signifies a questioning tone similar "huh" then that's your prerogative.
And as far as me being "off-topic." I was simply responding to a post that was relevant in the thread.
