ernest_t_bass;1396546 wrote:No, the problem is, given that scenario, the answer is easy. Instead of answering said scenario with the obvious easy answer, you try to spin it.
All zwick ever does is back pedal. He doesn't even know wtf he is arguing about 90% of the time once he is caught in an argument.
bigdaddy2003;1396565 wrote:Like_that, you have owned this thread. I wish I could've repped you multiple times. Well done sir.
Lol at the people who think minorities still have it as rough as they did in the pre-1965. I would love to come to your neighborhood and see these injustices. The only white people can be racist and white people have nothing to complain about arguments always bring the laughs as well.
lol thanks. This makes me laugh as well. When a black person cries racism/unfair treatment they are expressing their right to freedom of speech. When a white person does the same, he/she is a racist scumbag all because of what happened 200 years ago. GTFO.
BoatShoes;1396585 wrote:There is a difference between need and dessert. And, it's not so much that the white man is "holding them down" but that white people don't get to have hegemony for centuries saying that race matters and then when that hegemony is erased suddenly so "0 ju5t kidd1n guys we're a colorle55 s0ciety!"
LOL, just answer his fucking question.
sleeper;1396589 wrote:So 200 years from now, will white people receive benefits for the color of their skin because of the "hegemony" being experienced by whites right now? Like I said, minorities need to grow up.
+1
ernest_t_bass;1396593 wrote:Except they won't, because they enslaved people 300-400 years prior.
lol'd