4* OT Torrian Wilson de-commits from Stanford

Home ▸ Archive ▸ College Sports ▸ 4* OT Torrian Wilson de-commits from Stanford
Trueblue23's avatar

Trueblue23

BASEDgod

7,463 posts
Dec 22, 2009 10:09 PM
Now lists his top three as Michigan, Tennessee and USF
Dec 22, 2009 10:09pm
O

OldDanTucker

Senior Member

283 posts
Dec 23, 2009 9:46 AM
wonder why the de-commit and not even considering stanford anymore
Dec 23, 2009 9:46am
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Dec 23, 2009 12:48 PM
looks like tsun may pick up a good one...

http://stanford.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=911490
Dec 23, 2009 12:48pm
P

pkebker

Senior Member

760 posts
Dec 23, 2009 1:03 PM
Any word on when he'll re-commit to somewhere?
Dec 23, 2009 1:03pm
T

Tinkertrain

Senior Member

407 posts
Dec 23, 2009 9:58 PM
I'd be surprised if he end's up at Michigan because I just dont think we have the room for him in this class. I'd much rather take two defensive tackle's or a DT and a Safety than a offensive linemen coming off a knee injury that pretty much ended his senior season before it began.

Michigan is probably going to sign 29 on signing day and we have two silent commit's allready in addition to being in a strong position for top 10 safety Sean Parker.
Dec 23, 2009 9:58pm
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Dec 23, 2009 10:02 PM
He may the be the greatest DT to ever de-commit from Stanford with the possibility of attending Michigan, Tennessee, or USF.
Dec 23, 2009 10:02pm
Trueblue23's avatar

Trueblue23

BASEDgod

7,463 posts
Dec 23, 2009 10:20 PM
Tinkertrain wrote: I'd be surprised if he end's up at Michigan because I just dont think we have the room for him in this class. I'd much rather take two defensive tackle's or a DT and a Safety than a offensive linemen coming off a knee injury that pretty much ended his senior season before it began.

Michigan is probably going to sign 29 on signing day and we have two silent commit's allready in addition to being in a strong position for top 10 safety Sean Parker.
You have to take into account that commitments don't mean shit, it's all about who signs. There are always kids who de-commit on signing day.

btw, who do you think the two silent commits are?
Dec 23, 2009 10:20pm
T

Tinkertrain

Senior Member

407 posts
Dec 23, 2009 10:29 PM
If you really want to know what's really going on with the michigan program/recruiting I highly suggest that you send the money and get an insider subcription to Go Blue Wolverine the scout.com Michigan site. It blows rival's out of the water and the quality of information is outstanding!
Dec 23, 2009 10:29pm
Trueblue23's avatar

Trueblue23

BASEDgod

7,463 posts
Dec 23, 2009 10:32 PM
Tinkertrain wrote: If you really want to know what's really going on with the michigan program/recruiting I highly suggest that you send the money and get an insider subcription to Go Blue Wolverine the scout.com Michigan site. It blows rival's out of the water and the quality of information is outstanding!
Bullshit.

I subscribe to both and Rivals is FAR better.
Dec 23, 2009 10:32pm
T

Tinkertrain

Senior Member

407 posts
Dec 23, 2009 10:39 PM
If you subscribe to both then it's your own fault for not knowing who the silent commit's are because it's been stated time after time on the victor's board in the depth chart's.

As far as I'm concerned the inside information that Scout had is far superior to anything that rival's can offer. You see thing's on the scout insider board's earlier than rival's and in many cases MUCH easier.
Dec 23, 2009 10:39pm
O

OldDanTucker

Senior Member

283 posts
Dec 24, 2009 2:33 AM
Tinkertrain wrote: If you subscribe to both then it's your own fault for not knowing who the silent commit's are because it's been stated time after time on the victor's board in the depth chart's.

As far as I'm concerned the inside information that Scout had is far superior to anything that rival's can offer. You see thing's on the scout insider board's earlier than rival's and in many cases MUCH easier.
agreed scout>>>>>>rivals
Dec 24, 2009 2:33am
P

pkebker

Senior Member

760 posts
Dec 24, 2009 9:40 AM
Tinkertrain wrote: If you subscribe to both then it's your own fault for not knowing who the silent commit's are because it's been stated time after time on the victor's board in the depth chart's.

As far as I'm concerned the inside information that Scout had is far superior to anything that rival's can offer. You see thing's on the scout insider board's earlier than rival's and in many cases MUCH easier.
Well are you going to tell us who they are??

BTW, Scout says he's an OG, while this thread is saying he's a DT...what is he?
Dec 24, 2009 9:40am
Trueblue23's avatar

Trueblue23

BASEDgod

7,463 posts
Dec 24, 2009 10:41 AM
Tinkertrain wrote: If you subscribe to both then it's your own fault for not knowing who the silent commit's are because it's been stated time after time on the victor's board in the depth chart's.

As far as I'm concerned the inside information that Scout had is far superior to anything that rival's can offer. You see thing's on the scout insider board's earlier than rival's and in many cases MUCH easier.
I don't buy the "Silent commit" thing because things change way too much. How many times have we saw a silent commit sign with a diff. team on LOI day?
Dec 24, 2009 10:41am
P

pkebker

Senior Member

760 posts
Dec 24, 2009 4:16 PM
What is a silent commit? and who has silent committed to UM?
Dec 24, 2009 4:16pm
Trueblue23's avatar

Trueblue23

BASEDgod

7,463 posts
Dec 25, 2009 7:27 AM
pkebker wrote:
Tinkertrain wrote: If you subscribe to both then it's your own fault for not knowing who the silent commit's are because it's been stated time after time on the victor's board in the depth chart's.

As far as I'm concerned the inside information that Scout had is far superior to anything that rival's can offer. You see thing's on the scout insider board's earlier than rival's and in many cases MUCH easier.
Well are you going to tell us who they are??

BTW, Scout says he's an OG, while this thread is saying he's a DT...what is he?
OT..

that was my fault, typo
Dec 25, 2009 7:27am
P

pkebker

Senior Member

760 posts
Dec 25, 2009 7:29 PM
thanks...eliminates confusion...
Dec 25, 2009 7:29pm